<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1490215931337_7627">RE: FQXi. I've submitted over the last few years. Each year has some interesting thing to help my research. This year it is Jack Sarfatti and his retrocausality. I think his retrocausality can fit into the STOEs model of diffraction.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1490215931337_7628"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1490215931337_7628"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1490215931337_7628">CHIP: Have you learned anything from your prior photon position study from my simulation.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1490215931337_7629">My model has some conceptual problem despite its prediction of the Hodge Experiment (varying light intensity across a slit diffraction experiment). Retrocausility may be a solution.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1490215931337_7630">Hodge</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1490215931337_7631"><br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1490215931337_7632"></div></div></body></html>