<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Hi Grahame and others,</div><div class=""> I think it’s important to find a causal link between fundamental particles with mass-energy and the creation of spacetime so I congratulate you on your publication in this area. Coincidentally I am working on an article which also attempts to make such a link. In the meantime I refer you to an earlier article “A transluminal energy quantum model of the cosmic quantum” at <a href="https://www.academia.edu/4429777/A_Transluminal_Energy_Quantum_Model_of_the_Cosmic_Quantum" class="">https://www.academia.edu/4429777/A_Transluminal_Energy_Quantum_Model_of_the_Cosmic_Quantum</a> or <a href="http://www.superluminalquantum.org/cosmicquantum" class="">http://www.superluminalquantum.org/cosmicquantum</a> which proposes a first quantum particle of the universe, along the lines of <span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; font-size: 10pt;" class="">Lemaître'</span>s comment <span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT; font-size: 10pt;" class="">“If we go back in
the course of time we must find fewer and fewer
quanta, until we find all the energy of the universe
packed in a few or even in a unique quantum”, from </span><span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPS; font-size: 8pt; font-style: italic;" class="">The Primeval Atom: An Essay on Cosmogony. </span></div><div class=""> best wishes,</div><div class=""> Richard</div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Apr 23, 2017, at 11:57 AM, Dr Grahame Blackwell <<a href="mailto:grahame@starweave.com" class="">grahame@starweave.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">Attached.<br class=""><br class="">G<br class=""><br class="">========<br class=""><br class="">----- Original Message ----- From: "Chip Akins" <<a href="mailto:chipakins@gmail.com" class="">chipakins@gmail.com</a>><br class="">To: "'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'" <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" class="">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br class="">Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 5:10 PM<br class="">Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Hi Grahame<br class=""><br class="">Is it possible for you to send a copy of 'Cosmic System Dynamics: A<br class="">Cyberneticist's Perspective on Gravitation'?<br class=""><br class="">Chip<br class=""><br class="">-----Original Message-----<br class="">From: General<br class="">[<a href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles" class="">mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles</a>.<br class="">org] On Behalf Of Dr Grahame Blackwell<br class="">Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 7:02 AM<br class="">To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br class=""><<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" class="">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br class="">Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity<br class=""><br class="">Dear Chip, Alex, Albrecht, Wolf,<br class=""><br class="">With regard to Chip's observation (below) on 'gravity/charge field?':<br class=""><br class="">You (and others in the group) may find it interesting to refer to my paper<br class="">in Kybernetes, Nov 2011: 'Cosmic System Dynamics: A Cyberneticist's<br class="">Perspective on Gravitation' [Vol 40 Issue 9/10, pp 1319-1330].<br class=""><br class="">In this paper I derive a direct correspondence between the composite<br class="">'electric-charge' field (as opposed to net charge carried by, e.g. three<br class="">quarks forming a nucleon - this difference is absolutely crucial) and the<br class="">universal gravitational field, including the phenomenon generally referred<br class="">to as 'curved spacetime (which I show to be, in effect, what might be<br class="">referred to as a quality of 'texture' of the universal electromagnetic (aka<br class="">gravitational) field.<br class=""><br class="">This perspective on that field, deriving initially from the recognition of<br class="">'massive' particles as localised* configurations of waveform electromagnetic<br class="">energy ('photons' for convenience), serves to explain every aspect of what's<br class="">referred to as 'gravitation', showing this to be in fact just a more<br class="">detailed view of what we refer to as 'electric charge'). Every feature of<br class="">the Equivalence Principle can be traced back to this underlying construct.<br class=""><br class="">[* 'localised' is in fact an over-simplification of the nature of material<br class="">particles, a consequence of our own limited perception. A fuller<br class="">consideration shows that the very concept of 'localisation' is in fact<br class="">misplaced, that particles are in fact 'alocal', to borrow a word from Bohm.<br class="">Our very notion of 3-dimensional space (and indeed 4-dimensional space-time)<br class="">is a limitation of our own sensory organs, and processing of signals from<br class="">them - presumably for very sound evolutionary reasons - one that we need to<br class="">overcome if we are to fully exploit the potential of this amazing universe.]<br class=""><br class="">[As an aside, this perspective also casts serious question on the need for<br class="">(i.e. existence of) the Higgs Field (and associated boson) to explain the<br class="">concept of mass. Given the questions hanging over the whole Higgs thing,<br class="">this would seem to be another point in favour of the charge-based notion of<br class="">gravitation.]<br class=""><br class="">Best to all,<br class="">Grahame<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">----- Original Message -----<br class="">From: "Chip Akins" <<a href="mailto:chipakins@gmail.com" class="">chipakins@gmail.com</a>><br class="">To: "'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'"<br class=""><<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" class="">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br class="">Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 2:07 PM<br class="">Subject: Re: [General] HA: HA: Gravity<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Hi Alex<br class=""><br class="">I have modeled this effect that spin has on surrounding space.<br class=""><br class="">My work was to calculate the magnetic moment anomaly of the electron. And<br class="">the solution is very straightforward.<br class=""><br class="">So I think this spin influence on surrounding space is significant. But I<br class="">did not call it gravity. I considered it to be part of the charge field.<br class=""><br class="">Your work in this area is interesting, and I will study it more. Thank<br class="">you<br class="">for the link to the article.<br class=""><br class="">Chip Akins<br class=""><br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class=""></blockquote><span id="cid:FBAF0454-9AA6-4FD4-A3B8-CDE4CD1AC4DB@hsd1.ca.comcast.net."><Cosmic system dynamics.pdf></span>_______________________________________________<br class="">If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com" class="">richgauthier@gmail.com</a><br class=""><a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" class="">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br class="">Click here to unsubscribe<br class=""></a><br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>