<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff text=#000000>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Wolf,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Thanks for your
response.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>I agree that:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>(a)
Equations match corresponding values, they do not necessarily imply
causation;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>(b) As I indicate in my starred
footnote (previous email), my broader view of reality includes the possibility
of some form of time-independent 'higher causation' - which in turn posits a
'time-independent' higher reality; from that higher perspective it is my view,
as you suggest, that we (i.e. our consciousness[es - but actually all one])
traverse the totality of atemporal reality in a way that gives us a sensation of
'time' * - however it shouldn't be taken from this that this atemporal reality
is set in stone, I believe that it is fluid, changeable, in a sense that's
beyond our comprehension (at present), responding to the collective input of all
consciousness. If we are to rise above the train-tracks that conventional
science is currently stuck in and move our thinking forward, we must be prepared
- once again, as Hertz did - to accept the possibility that there are aspects of
reality beyond our perception and actively seek out those aspects: only then
will we overcome limitations that we have imposed on ourselves by our limited
world-view.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>* Note that this implies that what we
see as 'the speed of light' is, rather, the 'rate' at which consciousness
traverses this atemporal electromagnetic 'space-time matrix' that we refer to as
the cosmos [which itself is another example of limited thinking]. That
'rate of traversal' itself raises various rather interesting
considerations.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Best regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Grahame</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=wolf@nascentinc.com href="mailto:wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolfgang
Baer</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">Nature of Light and
Particles - General Discussion</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, May 07, 2017 9:46 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [General] HA: Gravity</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<P>Grahame:</P>
<P>My computer did some funny things and just found your response and paper,
will read and comment, sounds interesting.</P>
<P>regarding your comments:</P>
<P>To Grahame: We are so used to causality and computer symbols that we write
m*a = F and think F causes acceleration. But mathematical equations express a
condition. The dAlambert principle expresses Newtons law as 0= F - ma or
0 = F + Fa , This should be read as the condition not a causal equation.
Physical material can only happen where all forces are zero. No
causality. Therefore simply a structural condition on possible configurations
of a Block Universe. In that sense everything already exists we just become
aware of the part we call Now as we move through it.</P>
<P> </P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>