<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Al et al.,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>"<FONT color=#000000>I'm nervous
about bringing gravity in. Really what it is, is still too mysterious.
Even for AE, it is just a pregiven phenomena, his only goal was to
quantify it. But, perhaps it's an E&M residue resulting from the
disparity in mass between + and - charge carriers.</FONT><FONT
color=#000080>"</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>I'd refer you once again to my paper
'Cosmic System Dynamics: A Cyberneticist's Perspective on Gravitation'
(Kybernetes Vol 40 issue 9/10, Nov 2011, pp 1319-1330). In this I show in
some detail how the phenomenon referred to as 'gravitation' can be fully
explained in every detail by simply recognising that attractive forces between
opposite charges and repelling forces between like charges are NOT precisely
equal (for unit charges in each case). A tiny difference between these two
effects (for which there is NO scientific reason why they should be
identical) - attraction being infinitesimally greater than repulsion - gives
rise to an overall attraction between 'ponderable masses' precisely in
accordance with every recorded observation. This explanation could well
also shed new light on those effects attributed to 'dark matter' and 'dark
energy' - another couple of what could well be regarded as 'fiddle factors'
comparable to Einstein's 'cosmological constant'. Like Einstein's CC they
could, rather, point to a feature of the cosmos that we have overlooked or
wrongly assumed.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>If one looks at it from this very
simple perspective, gravitation is far from being mysterious - it's simply a
2nd-order effect of 'electrostatic' attraction/repulsion (which is itself an
artefact of electromagnetic wave interference between non-linear
configurations of such waves, i.e. particles of matter) - gravitation, as
another separate 'force' in its own right, doesn't actually exist.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Grahame</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=af.kracklauer@web.de
href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists..natureoflightandparticles.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A
title=general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists..natureoflightandparticles.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, June 25, 2017 6:41 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [General] STR twin
Paradox</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 12px">
<DIV>
<DIV>While I am not completely confident that I fully understand the
objections, perhaps they have to do with the following point.
Ontological chages occure at (or to) the source of E&M interaction.
Perspective changes happen to (or at) the sink of E&M interaction---not
just sentient, passive observers. The actual, real efffect from the
source on a sink is physcially altered by the relative (deleayed) position and
motion of the source. For one thing, it is Gaussian diminished (i.e.,
reduced by 1/r**2). In this sense, time-dilation, space-contraction are
real effects (but only as far as the sink is concerned!). Sentient
observers, such as those emphasized by Wolf, are no more that a collection of
E&M sinks. So, the "obesrver" is taken into account in this
formulation.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I'm nervious about bringing gravity in. Really what it is, is still
too mysterious. Even for AE, it is just a pregiven phenomena, his only
goal was to quantify it. But, perhaps it"s an E&M residue resulting
from the disparity in mass between + and - charge carriers. Who knows???
For what it's worth! ---Al</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="BORDER-LEFT: #c3d9e5 2px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 10px; MARGIN: 10px 5px 5px 10px; PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; WORD-WRAP: break-word; PADDING-TOP: 10px; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space"
name="quote"><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV><FONT
color=#000080 size=2
face=Arial></FONT></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>