<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Chandra:<br>
    <br>
    I've often wondered about the plasma effect and how it could have
    been calculated accurately enough by  <br>
    <br>
    However on reading it is not clear to me that he discounts all
    gravitational light bending effects or simply in the plasma region<br>
    <br>
    I remember working on the Phase I GPS system at General Dynamics and
    wondering how they could ever estimate the plasma efect of a varying
    ionosphere but now the accuracies are down to a few meters so they
    must have done it<br>
    <br>
    Has anyone looked at ref 10 Lebach    is this the same Shapiro of
    the Shipiro Micro-wave speed of light measurement.<br>
    <br>
    THat light speed is effected by gravity is difficult to discount,
    however I always wonder if we are talking apples and oranges<br>
    there is phase velocity and there is group velocity and they are
    different <br>
    I think it is phase that produces the bending , could Dowdey be
    calcuating the ionosphering effect for group velocity and thereby
    getr the same answer <br>
    <br>
    Wolf <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. Wolfgang Baner
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/26/2017 9:51 AM, Roychoudhuri,
      Chandra wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BN6PR05MB3234D51D26EB11CF39D89EC893DF0@BN6PR05MB3234.namprd05.prod.outlook.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Wingdings;
        panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Verdana;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0in;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
        {mso-style-name:msonormal;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0in;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        color:black;}
span.EmailStyle20
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal">Grahame and the rest of the colleagues:<o:p></o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">Please, have a look at the attached paper
          by a retired NASA scientist, who firmly believes that the
          bending of light by stars is due to the refractive
          index-gradient produced by the plasma of the stars, not by its
          gravity.<o:p></o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">I am just “stirring up the pot” <span
            style="font-family:Wingdings">
            J</span>.<o:p></o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div>
          <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
            1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
                General
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]<b>On
                  Behalf Of </b>Dr Grahame Blackwell<br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Monday, June 26, 2017 11:27 AM<br>
                <b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General
                Discussion
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org></a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] STR twin Paradox<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Hi
              Chip (et al.),</span><o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">I've
              sent you the paper in question twice: once 25 Aug '16 in
              response to your posting of the same date, and once
              specifically in response to your request for same on 23rd
              April '17.  Let me know if you can't find either one of
              these and I can send it again.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">With
              regard to refraction of light by gravitational fields*,
              this follows directly from slowing of electromagnetic
              waves by such fields (a commonsense consideration akin to
              swimming through a dense liquid - but this is an
              interference effect); the bending is directly analogous to
              causing a vehicle to turn by rotating the wheels on one
              side slower than those on the other (the same effect also
              causes climbing plants to curl around their supports, rate
              of growth being inhibited on the side that's touching
              something).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">*
              Actually by the GRADIENT in such a field.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Best,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Grahame</span><o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid navy
          1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">-----
                Original Message -----
                <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:#E4E4E4"><b><span
                  style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">
                <a href="mailto:chipakins@gmail.com"
                  title="chipakins@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">Chip
                  Akins</a> <o:p>
                </o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                  style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">To:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">
                <a
                  href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                  title="general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">
                  'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'</a>
                <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                  style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Sent:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">
                Monday, June 26, 2017 2:13 PM<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                  style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Subject:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> Re:
                [General] STR twin Paradox<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Hi Grahame<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Question. 
              Regarding your paper on gravity.
              <o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">If the
              attractive force between unlike charges is slightly larger
              than the repulsive force between like charges, how do we
              explain the refraction of light by gravitational fields?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Do you have a
              copy of this paper you can share?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <div>
            <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
              1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                    style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
                  General [<a
href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]
                  <b>On Behalf Of </b>Dr Grahame Blackwell<br>
                  <b>Sent:</b> Sunday, June 25, 2017 5:52 PM<br>
                  <b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General
                  Discussion <<a
                    href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br>
                  <b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] STR twin Paradox<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Al
                et al.,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">"</span><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">I'm
                nervous about bringing gravity in.  Really what it is,
                is still too mysterious.  Even for AE, it is just a
                pregiven phenomena, his only goal was to quantify it.
                 But, perhaps it's an E&M residue resulting from the
                disparity in mass between + and - charge carriers.</span><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">"</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">I'd
                refer you once again to my paper 'Cosmic System
                Dynamics: A Cyberneticist's Perspective on Gravitation'
                (Kybernetes Vol 40 issue 9/10, Nov 2011, pp 1319-1330). 
                In this I show in some detail how the phenomenon
                referred to as 'gravitation' can be fully explained in
                every detail by simply recognising that attractive
                forces between opposite charges and repelling forces
                between like charges are NOT precisely equal (for unit
                charges in each case).  A tiny difference between these
                two effects (for which there is NO scientific reason why
                they should be identical) - attraction being
                infinitesimally greater than repulsion - gives rise to
                an overall attraction between 'ponderable masses'
                precisely in accordance with every recorded
                observation.  This explanation could well also shed new
                light on those effects attributed to 'dark matter' and
                'dark energy' - another couple of what could well be
                regarded as 'fiddle factors' comparable to Einstein's
                'cosmological constant'.  Like Einstein's CC they could,
                rather, point to a feature of the cosmos that we have
                overlooked or wrongly assumed.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">If
                one looks at it from this very simple perspective,
                gravitation is far from being mysterious - it's simply a
                2nd-order effect of 'electrostatic' attraction/repulsion
                (which is itself an artefact of electromagnetic wave
                interference between non-linear configurations of such
                waves, i.e. particles of matter) - gravitation, as
                another separate 'force' in its own right, doesn't
                actually exist.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Grahame</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid navy
            1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                  style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">-----
                  Original Message -----
                  <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:#E4E4E4"><b><span
                    style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">
                  <a href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de"
                    title="af.kracklauer@web.de" moz-do-not-send="true">af.kracklauer@web.de</a>
                  <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                    style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">To:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">
                  <a
                    href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                    title="general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
                    general@lists...natureoflightandparticles.org</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                    style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Cc:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">
                  <a
                    href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                    title="general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">
                    general@lists...natureoflightandparticles.org</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                    style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Sent:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">
                  Sunday, June 25, 2017 6:41 PM<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                    style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Subject:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> Re:
                  [General] STR twin Paradox<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                      style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">While
                      I am not completely confident that I fully
                      understand the objections, perhaps they have to do
                      with the following point.  Ontological chages
                      occure at (or to) the source of E&M
                      interaction. Perspective changes happen to (or at)
                      the sink of E&M interaction---not just
                      sentient, passive observers.  The actual, real
                      efffect from the source on a sink is physcially
                      altered by the relative (deleayed) position and
                      motion of the source.  For one thing, it is
                      Gaussian diminished (i.e., reduced by 1/r**2).  In
                      this sense, time-dilation, space-contraction are
                      real effects (but only as far as the sink is
                      concerned!).  Sentient observers, such as those
                      emphasized by Wolf, are no more that a collection
                      of E&M sinks.  So, the "obesrver" is taken
                      into account in this formulation.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                      style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                      style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">I'm
                      nervious about bringing gravity in.  Really what
                      it is, is still too mysterious.  Even for AE, it
                      is just a pregiven phenomena, his only goal was to
                      quantify it.  But, perhaps it"s an E&M residue
                      resulting from the disparity in mass between + and
                      - charge carriers.  Who knows???  For what it's
                      worth!  ---Al<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                      style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> 
                      <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  <div style="border:none;border-left:solid #C3D9E5
                    1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
8.0pt;margin-left:7.5pt;margin-top:7.5pt;margin-right:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt;WORD-WRAP:
                    break-word;-webkit-nbsp-mode:
                    space;-webkit-line-break: after-white-space"
                    name="quote">
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"
            align="center">
            <hr width="100%" size="3" align="center">
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
            If you no longer wish to receive communication from the
            Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
            <a href="mailto:grahame@starweave.com"
              moz-do-not-send="true">grahame@starweave.com</a><br>
            <a href="<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/grahame%40starweave.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
              moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/grahame%40starweave.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
            Click here to unsubscribe<br>
            </a><o:p></o:p></p>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>