<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Dear Eric,</p>
<p>it is not so simple to mail you my thesis, because by that time
(1975) nothing was made available online. My original paper is
more than 80 pages, so not so easy to scan it. But DESY has
published in advance a short form of the experiment, accessible by
the following reference:</p>
<p>G. Buschhorn et al., <span>Measurement of proton compton
scattering at 6 GeV and small momentum transfers,</span>
Physics Letters B, Volume 33, Issue 3, 1970, pp. 241-244.</p>
<p>Do you have access to Physics Letters? In case not, I can mail
you a copy of it.</p>
<p>Regards<br>
Albrecht<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 01.08.2017 um 20:52 schrieb Eric
Reiter:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1770707350.4893859.1501613527270@mail.yahoo.com">
<div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times,
serif;font-size:medium;">
<div>Eric says: Dear Albrecht. </div>
<div>Please. I would like a copy of your thesis. </div>
<div>Thank You. Eric S Reiter</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<hr>
<div id="ydp69cfd7dfyahoo_quoted_2142183522"
class="ydp69cfd7dfyahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial,
sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>On Monday, July 31, 2017, 2:26:20 PM PDT, Wolfgang Baer
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:wolf@nascentinc.com"><wolf@nascentinc.com></a> wrote:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div id="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608">
<div>
<p>Albrecht:</p>
<p>Thank you for Einsein's Paper especially a german
version. As I said I can no longer remember the
exact reference for the formula and but it was a
book edited by Sommerfeld " The principle of
Relativity" in which several of Einsteins papers
were translated into english. I'll try to chase it
down.</p>
<p>I'm sorry I do not find your references to
synchotron experiments that prove the speed of light
is constant, I do have your thesis experiment but
thought this pertained to the photon question , nor
can I find your equation of the change in c in a
gravitational field.<br clear="none">
</p>
<p>But in any case is the formula mc<sup>2</sup> = m<sub>0</sub>c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>
*(1/(1 + 2x/c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>-v<sup>2</sup>/c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>)<sup>1/2</sup>)
= ~ m<sub>0</sub>c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> + mx -
(1/2)v<sup>2</sup> where "x" the local
gravitational potential, not correct for a single
mass particle traveling at velocity v , and is the
approximation not correct for v< c? <br
clear="none">
</p>
According to Mach's principle mc<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>
= -mMuG/Ru in other words mc<sub>0</sub><sup>2 </sup>is
the gravity potential in intergalactic space but still
inside the mass shell <br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
So these considerations gives me a very simple classic
visualization of most of the relativistic effects,
when v<sup>4</sup>/c<sup>4</sup> terms can be
neglected. All I've done is acknowledged that there is
a universe mass shell gravity effect on the speed of
light, and if we accept that then we can retain most
of our classic physics. <br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
What I am looking for is experiments that prove
Einstein's general relativity is correct beyond the v<sup>4</sup>/c<sup>4</sup>
approximation. <br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
AS an interesting aside if you accept that all we need
to do is include the Mass shell in the gravity
potential then we can rewrite the energy relation as a
momentum relationship <br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
mc = m<sub>0</sub>c<sub>0</sub> *(1/(c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>
+ 2x - v<sup>2</sup>)<sup>1/2</sup>) = m<sub>0</sub>c<sub>0</sub>
*(1/(V-T)<sup>1/2</sup>) = m<sub>0</sub>c<sub>0</sub>
*(1/(L)<sup>1/2</sup>) <br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
and multipying by c<sub>0</sub><br clear="none">
gives mcc<sub>0</sub> = m<sub>0</sub>c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>
*(1/(L)<sup>1/2</sup>) <br clear="none">
which suggests the Relativistic correction simply
accounts for the fact that phase rather than group
velocity is used in some measurements like michelson
morely and light bending while group velocity is used
in Shapiro's measurements. I have not pursued this but
always wondered that the wave mechanics has a phase x
group velocity be a constant.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Wolf<br clear="none">
<pre class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-signature">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-cite-prefix">On
7/31/2017 8:08 AM, Albrecht Giese wrote:<br
clear="none">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<p>Wolf,</p>
<p>attached I have added here the original paper of
Einstein from 1905 as a facsimile (so in German). I
cannot find your equation in his paper.</p>
<p>Regarding the change of c in a gravitational field:
I have given you several times the equation for
that. So not a point of discussion. But you
complained in the other mail that you have asked me
half a dozen times for a measurement of the speed of
light, without response as you said. For this I have
given you the reference to my earlier mail where I
referred to and explained the permanent measurement
of c in particle accelerators, particularly in
synchrotrons. Also in synchrotrons it follows from
the finiteness of c that the mass <i>m </i>increases
with an increasing energy of the particles. <br
clear="none">
</p>
<p>Further questions?</p>
<p>Albrecht<br clear="none">
</p>
<br clear="none">
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-cite-prefix">Am
31.07.2017 um 08:08 schrieb Wolfgang Baer:<br
clear="none">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<p>Albrecht:</p>
<p>That equation waS copied out of Einsteins 1905
Paper , I gave the book back to the Library and will
have to order it again to verify exactly the context
Einstiein used it. It may be I copied the formula
wrong and Einstein actually wrote c = c<sub>0</sub>*(1/(1-v<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>2</sup>)<sup>1/2</sup>)
which the gives c<sup>2</sup> = c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>
+v<sup>2</sup>.</p>
<p>In any case if I multiply by the mass "m" of the
particle and takes the small velocity approximation
one gets mc<sup>2</sup> = mc<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>
*(1/(1-v<sup>2</sup>/c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>)<sup>1/2</sup>)
=~ mc<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>+1/2 mv<sup>2</sup></p>
<p>I believe the point I was trying to make is that
the classic Lagrangian = T-V which equals mc<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>+1/2
mv<sup>2 </sup>if mc<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>=
-GmMu/Ru . So I'm saying if we simply recognize that
a mass "m" even stationary has a gravitational
potential inside the mass shell of the universe then
at least to terms v4/c4 a completely classic model
actually gives us all of the experimentally verified
Relativity predictions. <br clear="none">
</p>
<p>Furthermore if we write mc<sup>2</sup> = m<sub>0</sub>c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>
*(1/(1-v<sup>2</sup>/c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>)<sup>1/2</sup>)
then it is quite arbitrary to which parameter m<sub>0</sub>
or c<sub>0 </sub>one apples the SRT correction to.
You like applying it to the mass and say that mass
increases. I thought it makes more sense to apply it
to the speed of light <br clear="none">
</p>
<p>Whether I made a mistake in copying Einsteins
formula or not the argument I was trying to make is
the same. The speed of light depends upon the
gravitational potential in which the measurement of
the speed of light is made, it is not constant</p>
<p><br clear="none">
</p>
<p>Wolf<br clear="none">
</p>
<p> <br clear="none">
</p>
<p> <br clear="none">
</p>
<pre class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-signature">Dr. Wolfgang
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-cite-prefix">On
7/30/2017 12:00 PM, Albrecht Giese wrote:<br
clear="none">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<p>Wolf,</p>
<p>in my mail of July 6 I have explained that any
particle accelerator and particularly a synchrotron
is a permanent check for the speed of light, and in
particular also a check of the Lorentz
transformation where it describes the behaviour of
an object being accelerated towards c. And that a
behaviour of physics regarding c different from the
Lorentz transformation would require a different
design of particle accelerators. So, the opinion of
main stream regarded the measured value of the speed
of light is permanently confirmed.<br clear="none">
</p>
<p>And in your mail of July 4 you presented the
following equation for the speed of light:<br
clear="none">
c<sup>2</sup> = c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> *(1/(1-v<sup>2</sup>/c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>)<sup>1/2</sup>).<br
clear="none">
What ever the conditions for this equation should
be, there exist conditions for c to go to infinity.
To this equation I have referred. <br clear="none">
</p>
<p>Albrecht<br clear="none">
</p>
<br clear="none">
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-cite-prefix">Am
29.07.2017 um 08:21 schrieb Wolfgang Baer:<br
clear="none">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<p>Clarification: <br clear="none">
</p>
<p>I have submitted equations in which the
approximation of ( +2mm<sub>l</sub>G/r -2mc<sup>2</sup>-
mv<sup>2</sup>)<sup>-1/2</sup> =<sup> </sup>~ <sup>
</sup>1/2 mv<sup>2</sup> + mc<sup>2</sup> -mm<sub>l</sub>G/r</p>
<p>So that simply by recognizing that mc<sup>2 </sup>is
the classic potential energy inside a mass shell -m
*Mu* G/Ru ofthe Universe we get a very simple
cosmology that is completely consistent with all
known experiments - the assumption is simply that
the speed of light as a surrogate for the speed of
all electromagnetic phenomena is dependent upon the
gravitational potential which was shown by Shapiro's
experiments. and light bending.and clock slow downs.
I interpret c<sup>2</sup> is the universe escape
velocity. <br clear="none">
</p>
<p>This does not mean the speed of light is infinite
but only that if we could get outside the mass shell
in flat space where the gravitational energy of the
universe mass is zero the speed of light is some
reference c<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> In both case
the speed of lighjt and the energy is only
determined to an arbitrary reference constant what
is important is the relative energy or speed of
light <br clear="none">
</p>
<p>I'm tired of not being recognized as an intelligent
physicist doing physics. I'm only claiming that the
the first order approximation is all I know that has
been experimentally verified length contraction and
close to speed of light experiments are only
verified through circular reasoning <br
clear="none">
</p>
<p>I have asked Albrecht for references to experiments
that show otherwise a half dozen times but am always
ignored <br clear="none">
</p>
<p><br clear="none">
</p>
<p>wolf<br clear="none">
</p>
<pre class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-signature">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-cite-prefix">On
7/28/2017 8:54 AM, Albrecht Giese wrote:<br
clear="none">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<p>Chandra,</p>
<p>you have written here a lot of good and true
considerations; with most of them I can agree.
However two comments from my view:</p>
<p>1.) The speed of light: <br clear="none">
The speed of light when <i>measured in vacuum </i>shows
always a constant value. Einstein has taken this
result as a fact in so far that the real speed of
light is constant. However if we follow the
Lorentzian interpretation of relativity then only
the <i>measured </i>c is constant. It looks
constant because, if the measurement equipment is in
motion, the instruments change their indications so
that the result shows the known constant value. - I
personally follow the Lorentzian relativity because
in this version the relativistic phenomena can be
deduced from known physical behaviour. So, it is
true physics.<br clear="none">
</p>
<p>There is a different understanding of what Wolf
thinks. He has in the preceding discussion here
given an equation, according to which the speed of
light can go up to infinity. This is to my knowledge
in conflict with any measurement.<br clear="none">
</p>
<p>2) The quantisation of light:<br clear="none">
This was also discussed repeatedly here in these
mails. And I have (also) repeatedly referred to my
PhD experiment, which was Compton scattering at
protons. An electron of defined energy was
converted into a photon. The photon was scattered at
a proton at extreme small angles (so almost no
influence) and then re-converted into an
electron-positron pair. This pair was measured and
it reproduced quite exactly (by better than 2
percent) the energy of the originals electron. This
was repeated for electrons of different energies. -
I do not see any explanation for this process
without the assumption that there was a photon (i.e.
a quantum) of a well defined energy, not a light
wave. <br clear="none">
</p>
<p>How does this fit into your understanding?</p>
<p>Best wishes<br clear="none">
Albrecht</p>
<p>PS: Can I find your book "Causal Physics" online?<br
clear="none">
</p>
<p><br clear="none">
</p>
<br clear="none">
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-cite-prefix">Am
26.07.2017 um 18:52 schrieb Roychoudhuri, Chandra:<br
clear="none">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608WordSection1">
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">Wolf:</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">You
have said it well:</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><i>“Concentrating
on finding the mechanisms of connection between
the Hallucination and the reality is my
approach. I think the constant speed of light
assumption is one of the first pillars that must
fall. If there is such a constant it should in
my opinion be interpreted as the speed of Now…”.
</i></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">Yes,
“constant c” is a fundamentally flawed postulate
by the theoretician Einstein, so fond of “Gedanken
Experiments”. Unfortunately, one can cook up wide
varieties of logically self-consistent
mathematical theories and then match them up with
“Gedanken” experiments! We know that in the real
world, we know that the velocity of light is
dictated by both the medium and the velocity of
the medium. Apparently, Einstein’s “Gedanken
Experiment” of riding the crest of a light wave
inspired him to construct SRT and sold all the
mathematical physicists that nature if
4-diemsional. Out of the “Messiah Complex”, we now
believe that the universe could be 5, or, 7, or
11, or, 13, …. dimensional system where many of
the dimensions are “folded in” !!!! By the way,
running time is not a measurable physical
parameter. We can contract or dilate frequency of
diverse oscillators, using proper physical
influence, not the running time. Frequency of
oscillators help us measure a period (or time
interval). <span style="font-size:11.0pt;"></span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">Wise
human thinkers have recognized this
“Hallucination” problem from ancient times, which
are obvious (i) from Asian perspective of how five
blinds can collaborate to construct a reasonable
model of the Cosmic Elephant and then keep on
iterating the model ad infinitum, or (ii) Western
perspective of “shadows of external objects
projected inside a cave wall”. Unfortunately, we
become “groupies” of our contemporary “messiahs”
to survive economically and feel “belonging to the
sociaety”. The result is the current sad state of
moribund physics thinking. Fortunately, many
people have started challenging this moribund
status quo with papers, books, and web forums.</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">So, I
see well-recognizable renaissance in physics
coming within a few decades! Yes, it will take
time. Einstein’s “indivisible quanta” of 1905
still dominates our vocabulary; even though no
optical engineer ever try to propagate an
“indivisible quanta”; they always propagate light
waves. Unfortunately, they propagate Fourier
monochromatic modes that neither exits in nature;
nor is a causal signal. [I have been trying to
correct this fundamental confusion through my
book, “Causal Physics”.]</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">Coming
back to our methodology of thinking, I have
defined an iterative approach in the Ch.12 of the
above book. I have now generalized the approach by
anchoring our sustainable evolution to remain
anchored with the reality of nature! “Urgency of
Evolution Process Congruent Thinking” [see
attached].</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">However,
one can immediately bring a challenge. If all our
interpretations are cooked up by our neural
network for survival; then who has the authority
to define objective reality? Everybody, but
collaboratively, like modeling the “Cosmic
Elephant”.</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">Let us
realize the fact that the seeing “color” is an
interpretation by the brain. It is a complete
figment of our neuro-genetic interpretation! That
is why none of us will succeed in quantitatively
defining the subtlety of color variation of any
magnificent color painting without a quantitative
spectrometer. The “color” is not an objective
parameter; but the frequency is (not wavelength,
though!). One can now recognize the subtle
difference, from seeing “color”, to <b><i>quantifying
energy content per frequency interval.</i></b>
This is “objective” science determined by
instruments without a “mind”, which is
reproducible outside of human interpretations.</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">And, we
have already mastered this technology quite a bit.
The biosphere exists. It has been nurturing
biological lives for over 3.5 billion years
without the intervention of humans. We are a very
late product of this evolution. This is an
objective recognition on our part! Our, successful
evolution needed “instantaneous color” recognition
to survive for our day-to-day living in our
earlier stage. We have now overcome our survival
mode as a species. And we now have become a pest
in the biosphere, instead of becoming the
caretaker of it for our own long-term future. <b><i>This
is the sad break in our wisdom.</i></b> This
is why I am promoting the concept, “Urgency of
Evolution Process Congruent Thinking”. This
approach helps generate a common, but perpetually
evolving thinking platform for all thinkers,
whether working to understand Nature’s Engineering
(Physics, Chemistry, Biology, etc.) or, to carry
out our Social Engineering (Economics, Politics,
Religions, etc.).</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">Sincerely,</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">Chandra.</p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in;">
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;"> General [<a
shape="rect"
class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]<b>On
Behalf Of </b>Wolfgang Baer<br
clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:40
AM<br clear="none">
<b>To:</b> <a shape="rect"
class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br
clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Role of
observer, a deeper path to introspection</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
<p>Chandra:</p>
<p>Unfortunately the TED talk does not work on my
machine but the transcript is available and Anl
Seth states what many people studying the human
psyche as well as eastern philosophy have said for
centuries , Yes we are Hallucinating reality and
our physics is built upon that hallucination, but
it works so well, or does it?</p>
<p>However as Don Hoffmancognitive scientist UC
Irvine contends <a shape="rect"
href="https://www.ted.com/talks/donald_hoffman_do_we_see_reality_as_it_is"
rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">
https://www.ted.com/talks/donald_hoffman_do_we_see_reality_as_it_is</a></p>
<p>What we see is like the icons on a computer
screen, a file icon may only be a symbol of what
is real on the disk, but these icons as well as
the "hallucinations" are connected to some reality
and we must take them seriously. Deleting the icon
also deletes the disk which may have disastrous
consequences.</p>
<p>For our discussion group it means we can take
Albrechts route and try to understand the universe
and photons first based upon the idea that it is
independently real and then solve the human
consciousness problem or we can take the opposite
approach and rebuild a physics without the
independent physical reality assumption and see if
we cannot build out a truly macroscopic quantum
theory. Concentrating on finding the mechanisms of
connection between the Hallucination and the
reality is my approach. I think the constant speed
of light assumption is one of the first pillars
that must fall. If there is such a constant it
should in my opinion be interpreted as the speed
of Now , a property we individually apply to all
our observations. </p>
<p>best</p>
<p>Wolf</p>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer</pre>
<pre>Research Director</pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.</pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432</pre>
<pre>E-mail <a shape="rect" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal">On
7/23/2017 2:44 PM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt;">
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;">Dear colleagues:</span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;">Lately there has
been continuing discussion on the role of
observer and the reality. I view that to be
healthy.</span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;">We must guide
ourselves to understand and model the universe
without human mind shaping the cosmic system
and its working rules. This suggestion comes
from the fact that our own logic puts the
universe to be at least 13 billion years old,
while we, in the human form, have started
evolving barely 5 million years ago (give or
take). </span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;">However, we are not
smart enough to determine a well-defined and
decisive path, as yet. Our search must
accommodate perpetual iteration of thinking
strategy as we keep on advancing. This is well
justified in the following TED-talk. </span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;">Enjoy:</span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;"><a shape="rect"
href="https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_how_your_brain_hallucinates_your_conscious_reality?utm_source=newsletter_weekly_2017-07-22&utm_campaign=newsletter_weekly&utm_medium=email&utm_content=talk_of_the_week_image"
rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_how_your_brain_hallucinates_your_conscious_reality?utm_source=newsletter_weekly_2017-07-22&utm_campaign=newsletter_weekly&utm_medium=email&utm_content=talk_of_the_week_image</a></span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D;"> </span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D;">Chandra.</span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"><br
clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
</p>
<pre>_______________________________________________</pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a shape="rect" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a></pre>
<pre><a href=<a shape="rect" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe</pre>
<pre></a></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<br clear="none">
<fieldset
class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br clear="none">
<pre>_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
<br clear="none">
<div
id="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br
clear="none">
<table style="border-top:1px solid #D3D4DE;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="1" rowspan="1"
style="width:55px;padding-top:18px;"><a
shape="rect"
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient"
rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true"><img
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif"
alt=""
style="width:46px;min-height:29px;"
moz-do-not-send="true" height="29"
width="46"></a></td>
<td colspan="1" rowspan="1"
style="width:470px;padding-top:17px;color:#41424e;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial,
Helvetica, sans-serif;line-height:18px;">Virenfrei.
<a shape="rect"
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient"
style="color:#4453ea;" rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">www.avast.com</a>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608yqt8044876986"
id="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608yqtfd90837"> <a
shape="rect"
href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"
rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true"> </a></div>
</div>
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608yqt8044876986"
id="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608yqtfd46267"> <br
clear="none">
<fieldset
class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br clear="none">
<pre>_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<fieldset
class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br clear="none">
<pre>_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<fieldset
class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br clear="none">
<pre>_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<fieldset
class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br clear="none">
<pre>_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<fieldset
class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br clear="none">
<pre>_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a shape="rect" class="ydp69cfd7dfyiv5536154608moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
<br clear="none">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="ydp69cfd7dfyqt8044876986"
id="ydp69cfd7dfyqtfd41830">_______________________________________________<br
clear="none">
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the
Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a shape="rect" href="mailto:unquant@yahoo.com"
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">unquant@yahoo.com</a><br
clear="none">
<a href="<a shape="rect"
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/unquant%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/unquant%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br
clear="none">
Click here to unsubscribe<br clear="none">
</a><br clear="none">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>