<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3023">Chip:</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3024">RE: your papers "Modeling the photon", "What is light", and "On electric charge".</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3025"><br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3026"></div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3027">I'm looking to model polarization, reflection, and refraction. Your "Modeling the photon" may be a path. Consider a photon is a column if dusk magnets where the energy of the photon is proportional to the number of discs in a photon. The photoelectric effect suggests each has energy of $h$. The magnetic axis spinning perpendicular to the direction of motion seems to give your spinning wave. The magnetic field is spinning and induces the spinning electric field. But the coulomb field in the plenum (space) may have the infinite speed while maintaining the speed of the electromagnetic signal (photon) at $c$. Maxwell's equations could be rewritten with the basic unit being the magnet rather than the electron. </div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3028"><br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3029"></div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3030">The Stern-Gerlach experiment produces an alignment of the photon's magnetic axis and the appearance/interpretation of "spin" of 1 (not really spinning because the external magnetic field aligns the photon). Here I distinguish what the experiment actually is versus the model interpretation (may be false) of angular momentum. If objects (polarizing films) can do the same, polarization, reflection, and refraction can be explained. </div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3031"><br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3032"></div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3033">Your model suggests a way to explain polarization, reflection, and refraction. If so, this explains some difficulties with the STOE model of galaxy redshift.</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3034">Please comment. Can this be?</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3035"><br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3036"></div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3037">Are you working on diffraction and interference for your model?</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3038"><br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3039"></div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3040">Hodge</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3041"><br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3042"></div></div></body></html>