<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Hi John Hodge<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>This is an interesting approach you have suggested. I have not reviewed the photon or electron using this approach. I am working on diffraction, refraction, and “interference” but the math modeling is of course time consuming. So it is taking some work to model these effects. So far the results are very encouraging.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>I can to this idea by reviewing the concept which was explored a hundred years ago by Lorentz, Lord Kelvin, Poincare, Maxwell, and several others, and comparing that to the ideas generated by this discussion group. What has evolved is a model which occupies 3 dimensional Euclidian space, and yields the observed properties, including the quantum nature of particles, and the perception of relativity.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>I will think about you suggestions and the behavior of photons (and electrons), and explore the ramifications.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Thank you.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Hodge John<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, October 27, 2017 3:32 AM<br><b>To:</b> general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org<br><b>Subject:</b> [General] paper "Modeling the photon"<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3023"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'>Chip:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3024"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'>RE: your papers "Modeling the photon", "What is light", and "On electric charge".<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3025"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3027"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'>I'm looking to model polarization, reflection, and refraction. Your "Modeling the photon" may be a path. Consider a photon is a column if dusk magnets where the energy of the photon is proportional to the number of discs in a photon. The photoelectric effect suggests each has energy of $h$. The magnetic axis spinning perpendicular to the direction of motion seems to give your spinning wave. The magnetic field is spinning and induces the spinning electric field. But the coulomb field in the plenum (space) may have the infinite speed while maintaining the speed of the electromagnetic signal (photon) at $c$. Maxwell's equations could be rewritten with the basic unit being the magnet rather than the electron. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3028"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3030"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'>The Stern-Gerlach experiment produces an alignment of the photon's magnetic axis and the appearance/interpretation of "spin" of 1 (not really spinning because the external magnetic field aligns the photon). Here I distinguish what the experiment actually is versus the model interpretation (may be false) of angular momentum. If objects (polarizing films) can do the same, polarization, reflection, and refraction can be explained. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3031"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3033"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'>Your model suggests a way to explain polarization, reflection, and refraction. If so, this explains some difficulties with the STOE model of galaxy redshift.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3034"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'>Please comment. Can this be?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3035"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3037"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'>Are you working on diffraction and interference for your model?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3038"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3040"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'>Hodge<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509093017516_3041"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></div></div></body></html>