<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="userStyles" style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000;">
<p style="margin-right:0cm; margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">Hello Hodge,</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0cm; margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">"<i>Does this imply the interpretations of experiments that suggest time or length dilation are misinterpreted?</i>"</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0cm; margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">Quite possibly I would say.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0cm; margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">If we were to exclude the possibility of time or length dilation, what is there to consider as an alternate possilility?</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0cm; margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">To remain consistent with Maxwell, then the speed of light would also remain constant.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0cm; margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">Assuming now that the signals (radar, radio, light, etc) are made of streams of individual photons, then knowing that light is deflected by massive stellar bodies, this implies that the trajectories of these indifidual photons would be deflected by the presence on large masses close to their paths.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0cm; margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">If we take this as premisse, then it becomes easy to relate to the fact that a curved trajectory between emitter and receiver will by longer by structure than a straight line trajectory if no large massive body is in the way.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0cm; margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">Seems to me that this could easily explain the Shapiro effect without any recourse to length nor time dilation.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0cm; margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">Since that with the em structure that I ended up with for localized em photons, only half the energy of the quantum would be affected by transverse interaction, confirmation calculations would of course be required to confirm. </span></span></p>
<footer class="signatureDivContainer">
<footer class="signatureContainer" style="display:inline;"><span style="font-size:12pt;">Best Regards<br>
---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
http://www.gsjournal.net/<br>
http://www.srpinc.org/</span></footer>
</footer>
<footer class="replyforwardcontainer"><br>
<br>
<i>On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 15:32:38 +0000 (UTC), Hodge John <jchodge@frontier.com> wrote:</jchodge@frontier.com></i><br>
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509636651506_2459">Andre:</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509636651506_2460">RE: Coulomb force induces kenetic energy in charges</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509636651506_2461">Does this imply the interpretations of experiments that suggest time or length dilation are misinterpreted?</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509636651506_2462">I agree but how? For example, I suggest the Shapiro delay is actually a change in the speed of light rather than a time dilation. Yeah, SR is rejected by experiment.</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509636651506_2463">Hodge</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509636651506_2464"> </div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at srp2@srpinc.org<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">Click here to unsubscribe</a><br>
</footer>
</div>
</body>