<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m =
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE>@font-face {
font-family: Helvetica;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@page WordSection1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt
}
LI.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt
}
A:link {
COLOR: #0563c1; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: #0563c1; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: #954f72; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: #954f72; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P.MsoListParagraph {
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-style-priority: 34
}
LI.MsoListParagraph {
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-style-priority: 34
}
DIV.MsoListParagraph {
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-style-priority: 34
}
P.msonormal0 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; mso-style-name: msonormal; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
LI.msonormal0 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; mso-style-name: msonormal; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
DIV.msonormal0 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; mso-style-name: msonormal; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri",sans-serif; COLOR: #1f497d; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
..MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.WordSection1 {
page: WordSection1
}
OL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}
UL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}
</STYLE>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-US link=#0563c1 bgColor=#ffffff vLink=#954f72>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Chandra,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Excellent - and very clearly put - in
every respect!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>A mine of valuable thoughts in a very
compact form!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Thank you,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Grahame</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>==========</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu
href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu">Roychoudhuri, Chandra</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=jchodge@frontier.com
href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com">Hodge John</A> ; <A
title=general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">Nature of Light and
Particles - General Discussion</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, November 05, 2017 6:37
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [General] The CTF and
NIW</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV class=WordSection1>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">Hodge: <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">You have raised too many
questioned to be answered in one session [Not enough
time].<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1"
class=MsoListParagraph><![if !supportLists]><B><I><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore">1.<SPAN
style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">
</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></I></B><![endif]><B><I><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">CTF
(Complex Tension Field):</SPAN></I></B><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"> I have
deliberately used a multi-word phrase to underscore its inherent physical
properties to minimize misinterpretations and confusions as to what I mean by
CTF. CTF concept is an <B><I>evolution</I></B> of the very ancient concept
“ether” (“aether”, etc.), whose interpretations kept on changing with time
creating only confusions, not resolutions. In my view point, CTF holds the
100% of the cosmic energy. Everything observable/measurable by intelligent
biological assemblies of atoms (from the viruses to the humans), including
themselves, are just interactions between different kinds of assemblies of
oscillations of the CTF, including EM waves. Electromagnetic wave excitations
perpetually move with a velocity “c”. However, localized self-looped
oscillations (particles) stay put in one place until it experiences some
interacting potential gradient (“curvature”) in its vicinity. [This particle
model resolves the absence of “ether drag” problem.] All forces are various
forms of potential gradients generated in the CTF due to various kinds of
excitations of the CTF. This is why the CTF concept is definitely one possible
approach to develop a unified field theory, which Einstein told us to keep
trying.<B><I><o:p></o:p></I></B></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"> Broadly speaking, the “Ether”
concept (that deep space has some physical property in various forms), goes
back probably two thousand years or more in the West; and, at least six
thousand years in the East. However, the concept was better articulated in
scientific language in the West, rather than as philosophy, as it were in the
East. <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"> Both Newton and Huygens
accepted “ether”. But, it was Huygens who “implied” it as a “tension field” by
describing the propagation of light as a wave undulation of a tension field.
No wave-excitation can travel with a constant speed unless the “medium” holds
some form of a tension field that perpetually pushes away any perturbation
imposed on it, as far as the <B><I>“uniform tension field”</I></B> exists. The
tension field’s inherent tendency at any point is to restore its original
state of equilibrium under perpetual tension. The spatially finite size of the
excitation of the CTF gets pushed on and on with the velocity “c”. However,
the delivered perturbation energy, that generated the local “deformation” of
the CTF, still resides as a part of the CTF energy. The wave is an
excited state of the CTF; <B><I>it has no independent existence</I></B>. The
CTF cannot assimilate (absorb) the perturbation energy. This is the root cause
of <B><I>Conservation of Energy</I></B>. That is why CTF pushes away the
deforming energy to regain its spatially-local equilibrium state. That is wave
propagation. The “wave” could be a finite “hump”, or a group of time-finite
and space-extant harmonic oscillations like laser pulses. This
wave-propagation propensity is correctly embedded in our wave equation.
Undergraduate derivation of string-wave equation under mechanical tension, is
an excellent example. [All orderly cosmic rules of engagement (interactions)
arise causally out of this Conservation of Energy in different ways under
different contexts. There are no “laws” that human intellect can impose on
nature.]<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">So, to differentiate
your “plenum” from the “CTF”, you should define “Plenum” explicitly. We must
try out many different models to visualize the same invisible Cosmic Elephant.
<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoListParagraph><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1"
class=MsoListParagraph><![if !supportLists]><B><I><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore">2.<SPAN
style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">
</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></I></B><![endif]><B><I><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">Rest of my responses are in <SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc">“blue” </SPAN>within your text
below:<o:p></o:p></SPAN></I></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B><I><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></I></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B><I><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></I></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B><I><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></I></B></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri',sans-serif; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #e1e1e1 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<P class=MsoNormal><B><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri',sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 11pt">From:</SPAN></B><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri',sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"> General
[mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
<B>On Behalf Of </B>Hodge John<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, November 05, 2017 4:36
AM<BR><B>To:</B> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
<general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org><BR><B>Subject:</B>
[General] The CTF and NIW<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5152>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Chandra:<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5153>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Did
you do the Rb-beam experiment?<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5154>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">I
suggest the key purpose of physics (science) is to understand (predict
outcomes of events) and to have the wisdom (ability to cause events) to use
the understanding. QM without a causal or visualize-able model can serve this
purpose. But causal is better and more likely to yield
wisdom.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">[There must well-defined and clear,
short-term and very-long-term, purposes behind all human activities congruent
with our evolution. Human knowledge gathering activities must follow the
<B><I>evolution process congruency</I></B> along with the long-term
sustainability of our biosphere, in our minds. Nihilistic intellectualism has
always been nurtured and supported by Tribal Leaders since ancient times to
assure their socio-political control over the masses. Since none of us know
everything about the past and the future of the cosmic evolution; we must keep
ourselves anchored to nature by constantly trying to appreciate the physical
interaction processes in nature, which are behind both the biospheric and the
cosmo-spheric evolutions. No wisdom is the final wisdom. No theory is the
final theory. They must be proactively allowed to evolve.
]<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5155>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5157>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Your
2017 conference paper<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5158>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Note
that the STOE model also does not have zeros in the interference part of the
double-slit pattern. However, in the experiment of Fig. 6 of vixra 1509.0107
"Light diffraction experiments that confirm the STOE model (a force of
interaction model) and reject all other models" that with $a_1 >>a_2$
(even if one of the cos coefficients =0 ) the interference fringes are still
visible.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5159>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">[I am sorry. My view is that the Human
scientific thinking processes, and projected theories, are not yet matured
enough to declare the rejection of “all other models”!]<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri',sans-serif; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5161>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">I
have thought that your CTF is similar to my "plenum". My current attention is
to identify spectrograph and polarizing (later reflection and refraction)
behavior. So:<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5162>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">RE:
your paper "Next Frontier in Physics -- Space as a Complex tension field", 4.1
1)Spectrometry <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5163>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">The
equations used are solutions of the wave equation. They are wave equations.
But this implies there must be some action to keep the wave oscillation
through the zero point. In media such as strings and water this is the
property of inertia. Without the property of inertia, the CTF fails to present
a "wave" (solution to the wave equation). This seems to imply the Fourier
monochromatic wave through the kinetic energy and as a solution of the wave
equation DOES obey the principle of conservation of energy. So, the Dirac's
statement that photons interfere only with itself is partly correct. This can
be modified to photons interfere with itself and with others that have an
equal energy (frequency). Experimentally, single photon diffraction has been
observed. Entanglement is a frequency resonance effect if the CTF wave can
travel very much faster than light. I note your view of gravitation and the
inertia in the CTF could derive the Equivalence Principle, which would require
monochromatic wave to conserve energy. <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">[Sorry. Too many questions. I will
answer only partly. <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">Correct human invented mathematical
logics (correct equations) never can capture all there is to know about
nature. Dirac went beyond his expertise to make comment about “interference”.
He did not even specify that the <B><I>linear</I></B> Superposition Principle,
while it is a correct mathematical starting platform; it does not represent a
measurable phenomenon of nature. It is the non-linear quadratic (square
modulus) of the sum of all the joint linear excitations imposed on the
<B><I>same detecting entity</I></B>, which represent a measurable physical
effect. Creating operating logic out of an un-measurable mathematical
equation, will always remain as a correct mathematical theorem only. This
kinds of assertions would not be very useful to promote our deeper knowledge,
or sustainable evolution, which is our ultimate goal. It will only be a
wasteful intellectual diversion, however pleasurable that might
be.]<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5164>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5166>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">The
$\Psi$ of QM is a "physical dipolar undulation amplitude" - a real wave. If
$\Psi$ is propagating forward in space and time, what is
$Psi^*$?<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">[Unlike the prevailing interpretation
of the QM-psi as a plane wave; I consider the particles as inherently
localized self-looped harmonic oscillations. Different excitations can excite
different kinds of internal oscillations. <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt"> Further,
this energy conserving universe cannot generate Fourier monochromatic plane
waves as they would require infinite amount of energy. So, developing theories
using infinite monochromatic Fourier modes will naturally generate different
kinds of “divergences” from realities depending upon the phenomenon being
modeled. Mathematically brilliant re-normalizing techniques will not help us
reveal the real interaction processes, which nature executes to carry on the
biospheric and the cosmo-spheric evolutions.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">Our core goal behind science and
engineering should be anchored to understanding the evolutionary processes in
nature and then apply them to assure that our progenies can continue living
for an indefinite amount of time (on earth now, and on other planets in other
stars in deep future). We, the blinds, need an indefinite amount of time
to fathom the magnificent creativities and the purposes behind the “living”
Cosmic Elephant. Our successful evolution has to be a collective
endeavor!<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">Sincerely<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #0000cc; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">Chandra.]<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5167>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">===============================================</SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5168>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Hodge<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV id=yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1509872787836_5169>
<P style="BACKGROUND: white" class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Helvetica',sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>