<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513374509996_3754">Andre:</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513374509996_3755">Thanks for the reference to Marmet's paper ("Fundamental nature ...") and you paper ("Field equations for ...").</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513374509996_3756">The vortices seem very interesting to my model ecause my plenum is non-viscus. I lthink his description of diffraction of photons doesn't work - especially for the single photon case. </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513374509996_3757">More to the point - could your and his model of electron and photon be that the photon/electron is made of magnets and the vortices ( I really like the vortices in my model -just still trying to apply) . The prime issue of the Poincare stress is solved and the "hollow" aspect is gone. I think the other issues can be solved if the rotation direction of the electric vortices are opposite (how to define direction) for positive and negative charge.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513374509996_3758">Could this work in your model?</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513374509996_3759">You'll notice I'm "out of the box" , also. My diffraction test is the 2 Hodge experiments and the Afshar experiment that reject wave light models.</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513374509996_3760">Hodge</div></div></body></html>