<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--></p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<p class="MsoNormal">Chip and Chandra:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In Goldstien’s Classical Mechanics he states
the existence of
mass, charge, space and time are a prior assumptions. In grad
school I always
thought classical physics was the last jumping off point for
physics that made
sense i.e. corresponded to my sensory intuition. Neither quantum
or relativity
theory gives me the same feeling of comfort, that is why I like
to, and perhaps
have always been stuck, on attempting to find my way from
classical physics
assumptions.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I agree most with Chandra’s call for
reexamination of our
belief in “<span style="font-size:14.0pt">various
characteristics of waves and
particles with reference to the experiments that measure them
and the
interaction processes that give rise to the data.’’</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">What I am missing is the rational for calling
something
emergent rather than fundamental. Most of the arguments I’ve
seen indeed include
equations that relate energy and perhaps properties of the CTF
field to mass
and charge but why is one set of variables more fundamental and
the other
derived?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Consider mass a single parameter that appears
in the calculation
of gravity and inertial forces both as a source and sink. E=mc<sup>2</sup>
does
not make any of the three parameters more fundamental than the
others , in fact
since c<sup>2</sup> is related to space permeability and
susceptibility and is <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>in
this case equal to the potential energy of
the particle in a Universe mass shell<span
style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>so
E = mMG/R , and furthermore Sciama showed inertia is directly
calculable from a
velocity dependent gravitational field in analogy with the
Magnetic field since
any velocity change of a particle is equal to the opposite
velocity change of
the M mass of the surrounding universe. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So momentum is due to the velocity dependent
component of
the gravito inertial field fulfilling Mach’s principle.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I do not understand “<span
style="font-size:14.0pt">Particles
much tinier than the wavelength of a propagating radiation,
and
electromagnetically non-resonant to the frequency, will not
experience any
“momentum” due to the passing wave.” </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I assume you are assuming a mass-charge
particle and a very
long EM wave. The EM wave passes the charge is moved very slowly
compared with
its size- as it moves it drags the mass along, the mass in turn
interact with
the inertial gravity field and restrains the charge from moving.
If there were
no mass attached the charge would always stay in equilibrium
with the EM field
there would be no Lorenz force i.e. its motion would be
determined by the current in Maxwell’s equation assuming
transverse waves. <span style="font-size:14.0pt">So, “momentum”
is an
interaction property. </span>Yes but an interaction property
due to interaction
with other masses. How does this make mass emergent?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Chip I do not understand your first
statement. “<span style="font-size:14.0pt">One problem with the
approach you suggest is the
overwhelming evidence that space (the complex tension field)
is a frictionless
and therefore massless medium.” </span>There is no friction
in elementary
particle interactions why does a frictionless medium have to be
mass less?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">“In our macro
world momentum
is the result of moving mass, but for particles, and EM
radiation, momentum is
present without what we call mass.’</span> I assume your are
talking about
light bending around the sun. But that is due to a refraction
effect due to the
fact that the speed of light squared varies in a gravitational
field. Einstein’s
field equations code this fact into space warp. If you use the
classic m= hv/c<sup>2</sup>
one gets the wrong answer by a factor of two.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Richard has
shown how
confined momentum can create mass. </span>I assume this has to
do with
gyroscopes and would be very surprised if mass did not show up
to calculate the<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>inertia
in the first place and such
confinement depended upon internal mass-charge interaction.
After all what
forces keep the mass in a gyroscope from flying apart? Some form
of coulomb attraction? Again without mass-charge interaction
there would be no Lorenz force </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">I have also
shown how
displacements in the CTF can cause momentum </span>This is
very interesting and
may give us a hint that I asked Chandra starting this thread. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">What properties of CTF are you assuming? What
motions of
those properties are you assuming that would confine the
momentum to a particle
size?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This may lead to an answer I’m looking for?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Wolf</p>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/21/2018 2:33 PM, Roychoudhuri,
Chandra wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BN6PR05MB323403B1B95061E5D30C91D293CE0@BN6PR05MB3234.namprd05.prod.outlook.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1027" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">“….it is likely
that momentum, mass and charge are emergent properties…”<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">Andre: Perhaps, we
need to start re-classifying various characteristics of
waves and particles with reference to the experiments that
measure them and the interaction processes that give rise to
the data. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"> I agree with
you for “charge”. It is an emergent property out of the
dynamics in the CTF.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">The “mass”
property becomes manifest only when we try to make the
object move. The fundamental property is “inertia’ to
motion. The existence of the object (particle), of course,
is a form of modified energetic excited state of the CTF
(localized oscillation).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"> The
“momentum” property, to me, becomes manifest during an
interaction with an entity that has “inertia”, whether
induced by a propagating particle or a propagating wave.
“Interaction” is the key term. Particles much tinier than
the wavelength of a propagating radiation, and
electromagnetically non-resonant to the frequency, will not
experience any “momentum” due to the passing wave. So,
“momentum” is an interaction property. A fast neutron (or
high energy cosmic particle) does not easily impart any
momentum to Another particle until passing through a lot of
materials.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">
General
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]<b>On
Behalf Of </b>André Michaud<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 21, 2018 8:38 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Foundational questions
Tension field stable particles<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">Hi
Chip (and All),<span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in"><span
lang="EN-CA">I completely agree with you, except that I
would formulate what you say only from a strict
electromagnetism perspective, in which the classical
concept of "momentum" does not come in perfect focus with
the manner in which the energy that allows momentum to
exist is adiabatically induced in charges by the Coulomb
force (stemming from Maxwell's first equation, which is
Gauss's equation for the electric field).</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in"><span
lang="EN-CA">In classical mechanics, momentum is obviously
the more fundamental principle, but in electromagnetism
energy proper is even more fundamental than momentum, and
still remains adiabatically present even when
translational momentum is inhibited.</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in"><span
lang="EN-CA"> He is how I would reformulate what you
wrote, but re-focused from the electromagnetism
perspective:</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in"><i><span
lang="EN-CA">"</span></i><span lang="EN-CA">Another
consideration regarding the energy of which mass is made,
is its similarity to the energy that sustains momentum.
In our macro world momentum is the result of moving mass,
which is due from the electromagnetism perspective to
translational momentum energy not being inhibited in its
motion, but for charged particles, and EM radiation, the
energy sustaining their translational momentum is present
without its transversely electromagnetically oscillating
component being called mass. Richard has shown how
inhibiting the forward motion of the energy sustaining
momentum can create inertia. I have also shown how
displacements in the CTF can cause momentum, and how that
specific momentum can become mass of a particle. So there
is some evidence from the electromagnetism perspective
which seems to indicate the energy is more fundamental
than momentum and mass, and that mass, which in
electromagnetism amounts to the "omnidirectional inertia"
of transverslly oscillating energy, is created from the
same momentum sustaining "unidirectional" energy that
remains adiabatically induced even when its translational
motion is inhibited.</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in"><span
lang="EN-CA"> At any rate, neither mass nor charge are
observed when no energy is present, but energy can be
present even when no momentum can be observed. So it is
likely that momentum, mass and charge are emergent
properties, resulting from the physical presence of energy
as a materially existing substance, which is adiabatically
induced by the Coulomb force in action between all charged
particles."</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in"><span
lang="EN-CA">If interested in this perspective on
momentum, I provide my analysis in Section "Momentum, the
Hamiltonian and the Lagrangian" starting on page 15 of
this paper:</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in"><span
lang="EN-CA"><a
href="https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/gravitation-quantum-mechanics-and-the-least-action-electromagneticequilibrium-states-2329-6542-1000152.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/gravitation-quantum-mechanics-and-the-least-action-electromagneticequilibrium-states-2329-6542-1000152.pdf</a></span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in"><span
lang="EN-CA">Best Regards</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA">André</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"
lang="EN-CA">
</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
<a href="http://www.gsjournal.net/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.gsjournal.net/</a><br>
<a href="http://www.srpinc.org/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.srpinc.org/</a>
<br>
<br>
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:28:29 -0600, "Chip Akins" wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Wolf<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">One problem with the approach you suggest
is the overwhelming evidence that space (the complex tension
field) is a frictionless and therefore massless medium.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Another consideration regarding mass, is
its similarity to momentum. In our macro world momentum is
the result of moving mass, but for particles, and EM
radiation, momentum is present without what we call mass.
Richard has shown how confined momentum can create mass. I
have also shown how displacements in the CTF can cause
momentum, and how that specific momentum can become mass of
a particle. So there is some evidence which seems to
indicate the momentum is more fundamental than mass, and
that mass is created from confined momentum.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">At any rate, neither mass nor charge are
observed when no energy is present. So it is likely that
mass and charge are emergent properties, created by the
interaction of the complex tension field and energy, and not
fundamental components of space.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Chip<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">
General [<a
href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Wolfgang Baer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:36 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Foundational questions
Tension field stable particles</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p>Chandra:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I think the first question I would want to ask is whether
the idea of making charge and mass elementary makes sense
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I ask this because so many of our participants are
attempting to derive these quantities from the more
fundamental principles.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Then I would ask is there any traction in recognizing an
internal side of matter in addition to the past and future
side?
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>As far as 4-D space time , I think putting time on a
spatial dimension and calling it the 4'th dimension is
confusing the actuality of change with the way we display
phenomena, Time is simply the state of a system we use as a
clock, which traditionally is the whole gravity driven
universe of stars, time intervals such as a second is a
measure of the amount of change required to go from one
state to another - the 4th dimension concept has always been
a confusion between the map and the territory.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>The flow of charge around a circle produces a self
contained doughnut of magnetic field - this makes me think
cold mass have a similar characteristic and are we moving
along with our mass aong a cycle in time<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Best<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>wolf<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Research Director<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 2/20/2018 3:00 PM, Roychoudhuri,
Chandra wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><i>“We nee</i><i><span
style="font-size:14.0pt">d a geometry in which both
space and time are curved back on themselves to
provide a donut in which the forces Fem, Fgi, Fcm,Fmc
are self contained eigen states at each action quanta.
</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Does
any of this suggest a tension field you might be
thinking about??”</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">Yes, Wolf, we
need to model mathematically the “twists and turns” of
different intrinsic potential gradients embedded in CTF
(Complex Tension Field) to create stationary self-looped
oscillations (<b><i>field-particles</i></b>). Maxwell
achieved that for the propagating linear excitations
using his brilliant observations of using the double
differentiation – giving us the EM wave equation. We
need to find non-propagating (stationary – Newton’s
first law) self-looped oscillations – the in-phase ones
will be stable, others will “break apart” with different
life-times depending upon how far they are from the
in-phase closed-loop conditions. The successes of the
mathematical oscillatory dynamic model could be judged
by the number of predicted properties the theory can
find for the <b><i>field-particles,</i></b> which we
have measured so far. The physical CTF must remain
stationary holding 100% of the cosmic energy.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">However, I
would not attempt to keep the primacy of Relativity by
trying to keep the Space-Time 4-D concept intact. If we
want to capture the ontological reality; we must imagine
and visualize the potential <b><i>foundational</i></b>
physical process and represent that with a set of
algebraic symbols and call them the primary parameters
of “different grades”. During constructing mathematical
theories, it is of prime importance to introduce
consciously this concept of “primary”, vs. “secondary”,
vs. “tertiary”, etc., physical parameters related to any
observable physical phenomenon. The physical parameter
that dictates the core existence of an entity in nature
should be considered as primary. However, it is not
going to be easy because of the complexities in the
different interaction processes – different parameters
take key role in transferring the energy in different
interactions. Besides, our ignorance is still
significantly broad compared to the “validated”
knowledge we have gathered about our universe. Here is a
glaring example. νλ = c = (1/ϵµ). If I am doing atomic
physics, ν is of primary importance because of the
quantum resonance with ν and the QM energy exchange rule
is “hν”. “λ” changes from medium to medium. If I am
doing Astrophysics, ϵ and µ for free space, are of
primary significance; even though people tend to use
“c”, while missing out the fundamental roles of ϵ and µ
as some of the core building blocks of the universe.
Funny thing is that the ϵ and µ of free space were
recognized well before Maxwell synthesized
Electromagnetism.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">With this
background, I want underscore that the “running time,
“t” is of critical importance in our formulation of the
dynamic universe. And, yet “t’ is not a directly
measurable physical parameter of any object in this
universe. What we measure is really the frequency, or
its inverse, the oscillation periods of different
physical oscillators in this universe. So, frequency can
be dilated or contracted by controlling the ambient
physical parameter of the environment that surrounds and
INFLUENCES the oscillator. The running time cannot be
dilated or contracted; even though Minkowsky introduced
this “dilation” concept. This is the reason why I have
been pushing for the introduction in physics thinking
the Interaction Process Mapping Epistemology (IPM-E). </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">Chandra.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">
General [<a
href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]<b>On
Behalf Of </b>Wolfgang Baer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, February 19, 2018 10:56 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Foundational questions
Tension field stable particles</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p>Candra:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in">Let’s consider
your tension filed is a medium underlying the experience
of space composed of charge and mass density spread out in
the cross-section of a time loop.. Coordinate frame cells
of
<i>small enough</i> sizes can be described by constant
enough mass and charge densities in each cell. For small
enough cells the mass and charge values concentrated at
their centers may be used in stead of the densities. The
resulting field of center values can take any pattern that
satisfies the extended dAlambert principle. Besides the
classic electro-magnetic Fem and gravito-inertial force
Fgi I postulate forces tat hold charge and mass together
Fcm, Fmc. This condition assures mass charge centers in
each cell appear at locations of balanced forces. Each
pattern which satisfies this condition represents a static
state of the loop in which the patterns are fixed for the
lifetime of the loop.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>The Charge-Mass Separation Vector
and Equilibrium States</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in">The physical
size of the space is its volume. The volume (Vol) of space
is the sum of the infinitesimal volumes dVol of each of
the cells composing that space “Vol = ∫<sub>all space</sub>
dVol”. These infinitesimal volumes are calculated from the
mass-charge density extensions in each cell when viewed
externally as shown in figure 4.3-3a . The physical volume
depends upon the mass charge separation pattern of the
equilibrium state the system being modeled exists in.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In CAT the extension of a cell can be
calculated as follows. In each cell the distance between
the center of charge and mass is a vector d<b>ζ.</b> The
projection of this vector onto the degrees of freedom
directions available for the charge and mass to move in
the generalized coordinate space allows us to expansion
this vector as,
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eq. 4.3-1 <b>dζ =</b> dζ<sub>t</sub><b>∙u<sub>t</sub></b>
+ dζ<sub>x</sub><b>∙u<sub>x</sub>
</b>+ dζ<sub>y</sub><b>∙u<sub>y</sub> </b>+ dζ<sub>z</sub><b>∙u<sub>z</sub>
+…</b> dζ<sub>f</sub><b>∙u<sub>f</sub> +…,</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">where the <b>u<sub>f</sub></b>’s are
the unit vectors. A space limited to Cartesian 3-space is
characterized by three x,y,z directions, but CAT models a
generalized space that encompasses all sensor modalities
not only the optical ones.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The volume of a cell calculated from
the diagonal expansion vector “<b>dζ”</b> by multiplying
all non zero coefficients,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eq. 4.3-2 dVol = dζ<sub>t</sub><b>∙</b>dζ<sub>x</sub><b>∙</b>dζ<sub>y</sub><b>∙</b>dζ<sub>z</sub><b>∙…∙</b>dζ<sub>f</sub><b>∙…
.</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The shape of this volume is determined
by the direction of the expansion vector which in turn is
determined by the direction and strength of forces pulling
the charge and mass apart. The direction of pull depends
upon the number of dimensions available in the generalized
coordinates of the media. The forces must be in
equilibrium but exact equilibrium pattern depends upon
which global loop equilibrium state “Ζ” the event being
modeled is in.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In the simplest equilibrium state the
masses and charges are collocated. This implies the
internal forward propagating in time forces F<sub>cm</sub>,F<sub>mc</sub>,
and backward propagating in time force F<sub>mc</sub>*,F<sub>cm</sub>*
are zero, and if there are no internal force pulling the
charges and masses together then sum of the remaining
exterior gravito-electric forces pulling the charge and
mass apart must separately be zero precisely at the
collocation point. A trivial condition that satisfies
these equations is when all forces are zero. In this case
there is no action in the media and no action for
expanding the coordinate frame defining a volume of space.
We are back to a formless blob of zero volume, where all
charges and masses are at the same point. This is the
absolute ground state of material, one level of something
above nothing. The big bang before the energy of action
flow is added.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in"><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter" />
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0" />
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" />
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t" />
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="" style='position:absolute;left:0;text-align:left;margin-left:0;margin-top:0;width:190.5pt;height:187.5pt;z-index:251658240;mso-wrap-distance-left:0;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:0;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:left;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical-relative:line' o:allowoverlap="f">
<v:imagedata src="cid:image001.gif@01D3AAA9.A05423A0" />
<w:wrap type="square"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]--><img
style="width:2.6458in;height:2.6041in"
src="cid:image001.gif@01D3AAA9.A05423A0"
v:shapes="_x0000_s1026" moz-do-not-send="true"
align="left" width="254" height="250"><!--[endif]-->To
exemplify the methods we consider an equilibrium state of
a single isolated cell whose only degree of freedom is the
time direction. This means the volume in all space
directions are infinitesimally small and the volume can be
considered a single line of extension “ΔVol = ΔT<sub>w</sub>
= ∫dζ<sub><span style="font-size:14.0pt">t</span></sub><span
style="font-size:14.0pt"> “
</span>along the time direction as shown in the god’s eye
perspective of figure 4.3-6. In this situation we can
consider charges and masses to be point particles. Forces
as well as action can only propagate along the material
length of the line time line represented in space as “Qw”.
We now list the sequence of changes that can propagate
through around the equilibrium positions indicated by
numbers in parenthesis.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in">(1)<span
style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>The upper charge is pushed from its equilibrium
position (filled icon) forward along the time line<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in">(2)<span
style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>It exerts a force “Fem” on the left charge pushing
it forward while feeling a reaction force “Fem*” that
retards it back to its equilibrium position<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in">(3)<span
style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>While the left charge is moved from equilibrium it
exerts an internal “Fcm” force on the bottom mass while
feeling a reaction force “Fcm*” which returns it to
equilibrium.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in">(4)<span
style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>While the bottom mass is moved from equilibrium it
exerts a force “Fgi” on the right mass while feeling a
reaction force “Fgi*” which returns it to equilibrium.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in">(5)<span
style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>While the right mass is moved from equilibrium it
exerts a force “Fmc” on the upper charge while feeling a
reaction force “Fmc*” which returns it to equilibrium. We
are now back to (1).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in">If the system
is isolated there is no dissipation into other degrees of
freedom and the oscillation continues to move as a
compression wave around the “Qw” time line circumference
forever. The graph however is static and shows a fixed
amount of action indicated by the shaded arrows around the
time line. Motion in “block” models is produced by the
velocity of the observer or model operator as he moves
around the time line. From our god’s eye perspective an
action density is permanently painted on the clock dial
and thereby describes an total event. The last degree of
freedom events are rather trivial
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We need a geometry in which both space
and time are curved back on themselves to provide a donut
in which the forces Fem, Fgi, Fcm,Fmc are self contained
eigen states at each action quanta.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Does any of this suggest a tension
field you might be thinking about??<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Research Director<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 1/24/2018 7:20 PM, Roychoudhuri,
Chandra wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">1. Yes, I have submitted an essay.
FQXi has not sent the approval link yet.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. Replacement of our SPIE conf.
Without a supporting infrastructure to replace
SPIE-like support, it is very difficult to manage. I
will try NSF during the last week of May. Do you want
to start negotiating with some out-of-box European
groups?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">3. Re-starting afresh from the
bottom up is the only way to start re-building a
unified field theory. It is futile to force-fit whole
bunch of different theories that were structured
differently at different states of human cultural
epoch.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">
<p class="MsoNormal">Sent from my iPhone<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
On Jan 24, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Wolfgang Baer <<a
href="mailto:wolf@nascentinc.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@nascentinc.com</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p>Chandra:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Just rereading your 2015 paper "Urgency of
evolution..."<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I love the sentiment " This is a good time to
start iteratively re-evaluating and restructuring
all the foundational postulates behind all the
working theories"<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Did you write a paper for FQXi?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I sent one in <a
href="https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3043"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3043</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Is there any chance to get a replacement for the SPIE conference, one that would expand the questions </span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt">beyond the nature of light?</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Wolf</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Research Director<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication
from the Nature of Light and Particles General
Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu"
moz-do-not-send="true">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</a><br>
<a href="<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the
Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org" moz-do-not-send="true">srp2@srpinc.org</a><br>
<br>
<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
moz-do-not-send="true">Click here to unsubscribe</a><br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>