<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>
<meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document">
</p>
<p>
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11">
<meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 11">
<style>
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<p class="MsoNormal">Albrecht:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I think I understand your arguments since
this is what is
generally taught, however I have always been uncomfortable with
the statements
involving “observer”.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So I question your statement “<span
style="font-size:13.5pt">The
different amount seen by the observer can be calculated by the
use of the
force-related Lorentz transformation - from the frame of the
electrons to the
frame of the observer.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now ancient experiments discovered that there
are two reciprocal
forces between charges. The relative distance R gives the
Coulomb force F<sub>E</sub>
and the relative velocity gives the Magnetic force F<sub>B </sub></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ignore:vglayout;
position:absolute;z-index:1;margin-left:161px;margin-top:17px;width:208px;
height:95px"><img
src="cid:part1.8AD6B9E5.5B31C6D4@nascentinc.com" width="208"
height="95"></span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now if these are independent entities whose
existence does
not depend upon any observation made by the observer (until we
get to quantum
measurements) . <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">This
means the physics is
fixed </i>and so are the parameters. Any measurement made by
any coordinate
frame when properly processed for its own distortions will
result in the same
parameters, so R,V, F<sub>B</sub>, F<sub>E</sub><sup> </sup>and
yes the speed
of light must be constant. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-tab-count:1"> </span>If
the
measurement results differ either we do not have objective
measurement
independent reality or else there is an unaccounted artifact in
the measurement
process.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I and QM claims there is no objective
measurement
independent reality. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Lorenz assumed the coordinate frame dilates
and shrinks so
that when raw measurements are made and no correction is applied
we may not<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>observe a
magnetic field but instead a
different Coulomb field so that the actual result on the object
measured
remains the same only the names of the causes have been changed.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now consider looking at the same two charges
from an
arbitrary coordinate frame. then in that frame the two charges
will have wo
velocities V1 and V2 but there will always be a difference V </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ignore:vglayout">
</span></p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="89" height="16"><br>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><br>
</td>
<td><img src="cid:part2.940F1C2E.160DD1EA@nascentinc.com"
width="258" height="115"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><sup> </sup></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><sup> </sup></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><sup> </sup></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><sup> </sup></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><sup> </sup></p>
<br style="mso-ignore:vglayout" clear="ALL">
<p class="MsoNormal">I contend that it does not matter what frame
you chose cannot
get rid of the relative velocity. The only way you can get rid
of the magnetic
field is if there was no relative velocity in the first palace.
And there never
was a magnetic field in the physics. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Therefore your further conclusion “<span
style="font-size:
13.5pt">As soon as an observer moves with one charge, i.e. he
is at rest with
respect to the frame of one of the charges, then there is no
magnetic field for
him.” </span>Is only true if there was no magnetic field in
the first place, a
very special case.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We must be very careful not to confuse the
actual physics in
a situation with the way we look at it. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If we apply the same analysis to the
Michelson Morley experiment
I think we will also find that there never was a fringe shift in
the physics.
The physics states charges interact with other charges, basta.
Introducing fields and
then attributing what has always been a summation of many charge
effects on one
test charge onto a property of empty space is simply a
convenient mathematical
trick that hides the physical reality.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I further submit this as an argument that
mass and charge are fundamental physics and if there is to be a
CTF it is the tension that holds mass and charge together when
electro-magentic forces operating on charge densities and
gravito-inertial forces operating on mass densities are not
balanced and pulls mass and charge apart. I further submit the
the resulting fluctuations in the mass-charge densities leads to
CTF propagating patterns that are an ontologically defensible
interpretation of Schroedingers Wave function.<br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tell me why I’m wrong</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Wolf </p>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/23/2018 6:51 AM, Albrecht Giese
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:cd0035cb-000b-d53c-4add-68bf5acc2f0d@a-giese.de">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<p><font size="+1">Chandra:</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">If two electrons move side by side, the main
force between them is of course the electrostatic one. But
there is an additional contribution to the force which is
measured in the frame of an observer at rest (like the one of
Millikan). In the frame of the moving electrons (maybe they
belong to the same frame) there is only the electrostatic
force, true. The different amount seen by the observer can be
calculated by the use of the force-related Lorentz
transformation - from the frame of the electrons to the frame
of the observer.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">If the oil-drop chamber is in steady motion
this has primarily no influence. Important is the motion state
of the observer. If the observer is at rest with respect to
the moving oil-drops (and so of the electrons), he will notice
a contribution of magnetism. Any motion of the chamber does
not matter for this fact.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">In general magnetism is visible for an observer
who is in motion with respect to both charges under
consideration. As soon as an observer moves with one charge,
i.e. he is at rest with respect to the frame of one of the
charges, then there is no magnetic field for him. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">Your example of two compass needles is a more
complex one even if it does not look so. To treat this case
correctly we have to take into account the cause of the
magnetism of the needle, that means of the circling charges in
the atoms (in Fe). If we would do this then - seen from our
own frame - both groups of charges are moving, the charges in
the conductor and also the charges in the needle's atoms. So
as both are moving with respect to the observer, this is the
cause for a magnetic field between both objects. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">Albrecht<br>
</font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 22.02.2018 um 21:02 schrieb
Roychoudhuri, Chandra:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BN6PR05MB32346522A179CDFD4D1D280F93CD0@BN6PR05MB3234.namprd05.prod.outlook.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:210265128;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:1952207248 397949086 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-text:"\(%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:.75in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
margin-left:.75in;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-tab-stop:1.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-tab-stop:1.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:2.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-tab-stop:2.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-tab-stop:3.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:3.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-tab-stop:4.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-tab-stop:4.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1027" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92">Albrecht: Your
point is well taken. Not being expert in magnetism, I need
to spend more time on this issue. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92">However, let me
pose a question to think.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92">If two electrons
are trapped in two side by side but separate Millikan oil
drops, the two electrons feel each other’s static E-field,
but no magnetic field. If the oil-drop chamber was given a
steady velocity, could Millikan have measured the presence
of a magnetic field due to the moving electrons
(“current”), which would have been dying out as the
chamber moved further away? This experiment can be
conceived in many different ways and can be executed.
Hence, this is not a pure “Gedanken” experiment. I am
sure, some equivalent experiment has been done by
somebody. Send me the reference, if you can find one. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92">Are two parallel
current carrying conductors deflecting magnetic needles
(undergraduate experiment) different from two independent
electrons moving parallel to each other?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92">I have just
re-phrased Einstein’s example that you have given below.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0A2A92">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">
General
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]<b>On
Behalf Of </b>Albrecht Giese<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, February 22, 2018 2:26 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Foundational questions
Tension field stable particles<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Chandra,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">I like very much what you
have written here. Particularly what you say about "time"
which physically means oscillations. That is what one
should keep in mind when thinking about relativity.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">However in one point I have
to object. That is your judgement of the parameter</span>
<span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">µ</span>. <span
style="font-size:13.5pt"> I think that it is a result from
the historical fact that magnetism was detected long time
earlier than electricity. So magnetism plays a great role
in our view of physics which does not reflect its role
there. We know since about 100 years that magnetism is not
a primary phenomenon but an apparent effect, a side effect
of the electric field which is caused by the finiteness of
c. If c would be infinite there would not be any
magnetism. This is given by the equation </span><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">c<sup>2</sup> =
(1/ϵµ)</span><span style="font-size:13.5pt"> which you
have mentioned. This equation should be better written as
</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">µ =
(1/c<sup>2</sup>ϵ) </span><span style="font-size:13.5pt">
to reflect this physical fact, the dependency of the
magnetism on c. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">The symmetry between
electricity and magnetism is suggested by Maxwell's
equation. These equations are mathematically very elegant
and well usable in practice. But they do not reflect the
physical reality. Easiest visible is the fact that we have
electrical monopoles but no magnetic monopoles. Einstein
has described this fact by saying: Whenever an observer is
in a magnetic field, he can find a motion state so that
the magnetic field disappears. - This is as we know not
possible for an electric field.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">I think that we have
discussed this earlier. Do you remember?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Albrecht</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Am 21.02.2018 um 00:00 schrieb
Roychoudhuri, Chandra:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><i>“We nee</i><i><span
style="font-size:14.0pt">d a geometry in which both
space and time are curved back on themselves to
provide a donut in which the forces Fem, Fgi, Fcm,Fmc
are self contained eigen states at each action quanta.
</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Does
any of this suggest a tension field you might be
thinking about??”</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">Yes, Wolf, we
need to model mathematically the “twists and turns” of
different intrinsic potential gradients embedded in CTF
(Complex Tension Field) to create stationary self-looped
oscillations (<b><i>field-particles</i></b>). Maxwell
achieved that for the propagating linear excitations
using his brilliant observations of using the double
differentiation – giving us the EM wave equation. We
need to find non-propagating (stationary – Newton’s
first law) self-looped oscillations – the in-phase ones
will be stable, others will “break apart” with different
life-times depending upon how far they are from the
in-phase closed-loop conditions. The successes of the
mathematical oscillatory dynamic model could be judged
by the number of predicted properties the theory can
find for the <b><i>field-particles,</i></b> which we
have measured so far. The physical CTF must remain
stationary holding 100% of the cosmic energy. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"> However, I
would not attempt to keep the primacy of Relativity by
trying to keep the Space-Time 4-D concept intact. If we
want to capture the ontological reality; we must imagine
and visualize the potential <b><i>foundational</i></b>
physical process and represent that with a set of
algebraic symbols and call them the primary parameters
of “different grades”. During constructing mathematical
theories, it is of prime importance to introduce
consciously this concept of “primary”, vs. “secondary”,
vs. “tertiary”, etc., physical parameters related to any
observable physical phenomenon. The physical parameter
that dictates the core existence of an entity in nature
should be considered as primary. However, it is not
going to be easy because of the complexities in the
different interaction processes – different parameters
take key role in transferring the energy in different
interactions. Besides, our ignorance is still
significantly broad compared to the “validated”
knowledge we have gathered about our universe. Here is a
glaring example. νλ = c = (1/ϵµ). If I am doing atomic
physics, ν is of primary importance because of the
quantum resonance with ν and the QM energy exchange rule
is “hν”. “λ” changes from medium to medium. If I am
doing Astrophysics, ϵ and µ for free space, are of
primary significance; even though people tend to use
“c”, while missing out the fundamental roles of ϵ and µ
as some of the core building blocks of the universe.
Funny thing is that the ϵ and µ of free space were
recognized well before Maxwell synthesized
Electromagnetism.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"> With this
background, I want underscore that the “running time,
“t” is of critical importance in our formulation of the
dynamic universe. And, yet “t’ is not a directly
measurable physical parameter of any object in this
universe. What we measure is really the frequency, or
its inverse, the oscillation periods of different
physical oscillators in this universe. So, frequency can
be dilated or contracted by controlling the ambient
physical parameter of the environment that surrounds and
INFLUENCES the oscillator. The running time cannot be
dilated or contracted; even though Minkowsky introduced
this “dilation” concept. This is the reason why I have
been pushing for the introduction in physics thinking
the Interaction Process Mapping Epistemology (IPM-E). </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">Chandra.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">
General [<a
href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]<b>On
Behalf Of </b>Wolfgang Baer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, February 19, 2018 10:56 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Foundational questions
Tension field stable particles</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Candra:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in"> Let’s
consider your tension filed is a medium underlying the
experience of space composed of charge and mass density
spread out in the cross-section of a time loop..
Coordinate frame cells of <i>small enough</i> sizes can
be described by constant enough mass and charge densities
in each cell. For small enough cells the mass and charge
values concentrated at their centers may be used in stead
of the densities. The resulting field of center values can
take any pattern that satisfies the extended dAlambert
principle. Besides the classic electro-magnetic Fem and
gravito-inertial force Fgi I postulate forces tat hold
charge and mass together Fcm, Fmc. This condition assures
mass charge centers in each cell appear at locations of
balanced forces. Each pattern which satisfies this
condition represents a static state of the loop in which
the patterns are fixed for the lifetime of the loop.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b> </b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>The Charge-Mass Separation Vector
and Equilibrium States</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in">The physical
size of the space is its volume. The volume (Vol) of
space is the sum of the infinitesimal volumes dVol of
each of the cells composing that space “Vol = ∫<sub>all
space</sub> dVol”. These infinitesimal volumes are
calculated from the mass-charge density extensions in each
cell when viewed externally as shown in figure 4.3-3a .
The physical volume depends upon the mass charge
separation pattern of the equilibrium state the system
being modeled exists in. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In CAT the extension of a
cell can be calculated as follows. In each cell the
distance between the center of charge and mass is a vector
d<b>ζ.</b> The projection of this vector onto the degrees
of freedom directions available for the charge and mass to
move in the generalized coordinate space allows us to
expansion this vector as, <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eq. 4.3-1 <b>dζ =</b>
dζ<sub>t</sub><b>∙u<sub>t</sub></b> + dζ<sub>x</sub><b>∙u<sub>x</sub>
</b>+ dζ<sub>y</sub><b>∙u<sub>y</sub> </b>+ dζ<sub>z</sub><b>∙u<sub>z</sub>
+…</b> dζ<sub>f</sub><b>∙u<sub>f</sub> +…,</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b> </b>where the <b>u<sub>f</sub></b>’s
are the unit vectors. A space limited to Cartesian 3-space
is characterized by three x,y,z directions, but CAT models
a generalized space that encompasses all sensor modalities
not only the optical ones. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The volume of a cell
calculated from the diagonal expansion vector “<b>dζ”</b>
by multiplying all non zero coefficients,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eq. 4.3-2 dVol =
dζ<sub>t</sub><b>∙</b>dζ<sub>x</sub><b>∙</b>dζ<sub>y</sub><b>∙</b>dζ<sub>z</sub><b>∙…∙</b>dζ<sub>f</sub><b>∙…
.</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The shape of this volume is
determined by the direction of the expansion vector which
in turn is determined by the direction and strength of
forces pulling the charge and mass apart. The direction of
pull depends upon the number of dimensions available in
the generalized coordinates of the media. The forces must
be in equilibrium but exact equilibrium pattern depends
upon which global loop equilibrium state “Ζ” the event
being modeled is in. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In the simplest equilibrium
state the masses and charges are collocated. This implies
the internal forward propagating in time forces F<sub>cm</sub>,F<sub>mc</sub>,
and backward propagating in time force F<sub>mc</sub>*,F<sub>cm</sub>*
are zero, and if there are no internal force pulling the
charges and masses together then sum of the remaining
exterior gravito-electric forces pulling the charge and
mass apart must separately be zero precisely at the
collocation point. A trivial condition that satisfies
these equations is when all forces are zero. In this case
there is no action in the media and no action for
expanding the coordinate frame defining a volume of space.
We are back to a formless blob of zero volume, where all
charges and masses are at the same point. This is the
absolute ground state of material, one level of something
above nothing. The big bang before the energy of action
flow is added. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in"><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter" />
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0" />
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" />
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t" />
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="" style='position:absolute;left:0;text-align:left;margin-left:0;margin-top:0;width:190.5pt;height:187.5pt;z-index:251658240;mso-wrap-distance-left:0;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:0;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:left;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical-relative:line' o:allowoverlap="f">
<v:imagedata src="mailbox:///C:/Users/AL/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Profiles/lthhzma2.default/Mail/pop3.strato-12.de/Inbox?number=6035&header=quotebody&part=1.1.2&filename=image001.gif" o:title="part1.89B7AF17.E7420CB4@a-giese" />
<w:wrap type="square"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]--><img
style="width:2.6458in;height:2.6041in"
src="cid:part7.D47F3D36.6837714B@nascentinc.com"
v:shapes="_x0000_s1026" class="" align="left"
width="254" height="250"><!--[endif]-->To exemplify the
methods we consider an equilibrium state of a single
isolated cell whose only degree of freedom is the time
direction. This means the volume in all space directions
are infinitesimally small and the volume can be considered
a single line of extension “ΔVol = ΔT<sub>w</sub> = ∫dζ<sub><span
style="font-size:14.0pt">t</span></sub><span
style="font-size:14.0pt"> “ </span>along the time
direction as shown in the god’s eye perspective of figure
4.3-6. In this situation we can consider charges and
masses to be point particles. Forces as well as action can
only propagate along the material length of the line time
line represented in space as “Qw”. We now list the
sequence of changes that can propagate through around the
equilibrium positions indicated by numbers in parenthesis.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(1)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><!--[endif]-->The
upper charge is pushed from its equilibrium position
(filled icon) forward along the time line<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(2)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><!--[endif]-->It
exerts a force “Fem” on the left charge pushing it forward
while feeling a reaction force “Fem*” that retards it back
to its equilibrium position<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(3)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><!--[endif]-->While
the left charge is moved from equilibrium it exerts an
internal “Fcm” force on the bottom mass while feeling a
reaction force “Fcm*” which returns it to equilibrium.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(4)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><!--[endif]-->While
the bottom mass is moved from equilibrium it exerts a
force “Fgi” on the right mass while feeling a reaction
force “Fgi*” which returns it to equilibrium.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(5)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><!--[endif]-->While
the right mass is moved from equilibrium it exerts a force
“Fmc” on the upper charge while feeling a reaction force
“Fmc*” which returns it to equilibrium. We are now back
to (1).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in">If the system
is isolated there is no dissipation into other degrees of
freedom and the oscillation continues to move as a
compression wave around the “Qw” time line circumference
forever. The graph however is static and shows a fixed
amount of action indicated by the shaded arrows around the
time line. Motion in “block” models is produced by the
velocity of the observer or model operator as he moves
around the time line. From our god’s eye perspective an
action density is permanently painted on the clock dial
and thereby describes an total event. The last degree of
freedom events are rather trivial <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We need a geometry in which
both space and time are curved back on themselves to
provide a donut in which the forces Fem, Fgi, Fcm,Fmc are
self contained eigen states at each action quanta. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Does any of this suggest a tension
field you might be thinking about??<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Research Director<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 1/24/2018 7:20 PM, Roychoudhuri,
Chandra wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">1. Yes, I have submitted an essay.
FQXi has not sent the approval link yet. <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. Replacement of our SPIE conf.
Without a supporting infrastructure to replace
SPIE-like support, it is very difficult to manage. I
will try NSF during the last week of May. Do you want
to start negotiating with some out-of-box European
groups? <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">3. Re-starting afresh from the
bottom up is the only way to start re-building a
unified field theory. It is futile to force-fit whole
bunch of different theories that were structured
differently at different states of human cultural
epoch.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">
<p class="MsoNormal">Sent from my iPhone<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
On Jan 24, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Wolfgang Baer <<a
href="mailto:wolf@nascentinc.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@nascentinc.com</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p>Chandra:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Just rereading your 2015 paper "Urgency of
evolution..."<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I love the sentiment " This is a good time to
start iteratively re-evaluating and restructuring
all the foundational postulates behind all the
working theories"<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Did you write a paper for FQXi?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I sent one in <a
href="https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3043"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3043</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Is there any chance to get a replacement for the SPIE conference, one that would expand the questions </span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt">beyond the nature of light?</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Wolf</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Research Director<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication
from the Nature of Light and Particles General
Discussion List at <a
href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu"
moz-do-not-send="true">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</a><br>
<a href="<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de" moz-do-not-send="true">phys@a-giese.de</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de" moz-do-not-send="true">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>