<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle25
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1027" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0C5408">Many thanks, Grahame!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0C5408">With stationary CTF, SR becomes totally unnecessary. The two postulates of SR naturally falls out of the stationary CTF. I am attaching an essay, where I have explained this and I am also pushing
for an experiment to validate the stationarity of CTF (in case, if you have missed it).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext"> General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Dr Grahame Blackwell<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, February 25, 2018 5:17 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Foundational questions Tension field stable particles<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Chandra,</span><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:windowtext"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">I agree with all that you say below.</span><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">In particular I feel we need to be very clear that 'field bosons' are a convenient fiction - what someone I knew would refer to as an 'architectural rendering' (a
construct to fill-in a conceptual gap left by an effect without in any way explaining it - demonstrating a total lack of understanding of that effect); I'd liken them to the Emperor's new clothes - covering nothing at all. Once we see particles as closed-loop
excitations (as you say), it's abundantly clear that such excitations do not have an abrupt cut-off boundary but extend indefinitely in such a tension field (like the rings emanating from a point in a lake where a pebble has been dropped in); as soon as we
see that, it follows as night follows day that inter-particle forces are in fact interference effects between non-linear waveforms - no need for manufactured 'explanations' for so-called 'action at a distance'.</span><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:windowtext"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">I believe we really are getting somewhere!<br>
(I need to read that paper of yours in detail.)</span><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:windowtext"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Best regards,</span><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Grahame</span><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid navy 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:windowtext">----- Original Message -----
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:#E4E4E4"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:windowtext">
<a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu" title="chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu">
Roychoudhuri, Chandra</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:windowtext">To:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:windowtext">
<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" title="general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">
Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:windowtext">Sent:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:windowtext"> Sunday, February 25, 2018 9:25 PM<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:windowtext">Subject:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:windowtext"> Re: [General] Foundational questions Tension field stable
particles<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Hi Chip, and also Wolf:
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> To me, CTF, as a tension field, holds 100% of the cosmic energy. Everything else is its “excitations”, or “deformations”!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> Particles are self-looped excitations, functionally non-linear, as they do not in general pass through each other, rather interact with wide ranges of interaction cross-sections.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> EM waves are perpetually propagating excitations. They are non-interacting linear excitations. They pass through each other.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> Forces are secondary potential gradients generated by the various self-looped oscillations around themselves. “Forces’ are not due to “exchange particles”! They “fall towards” or “repelled
by” the various potential gradients generated by themselves.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> All particle-properties are emergent properties out of their complex formative internal motions of CTF-tension characteristics. Recall that a Gamma wave packet (no charge or mass) can collide
with heavy nucleus and generate electron-positron pair with opposite charges and some inertia (“mass”). Gamma is a linear high frequency undulation of the CTF. So, charge and mass must be some emergent properties out of the dynamic motions of the CTF.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> I have attached my thinking on CTF during 2013.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> CTF guides us to model natural phenomena much more coherently than the current ad hoc theories.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter" />
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0" />
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" />
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t" />
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="" style='position:absolute;margin-left:0;margin-top:0;width:190.5pt;height:187.5pt;z-index:-251658752;mso-wrap-distance-left:0;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:0;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:left;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical-relative:line' o:allowoverlap="f">
<v:imagedata src="part7.D47F3D36" />
<w:wrap type="square"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><img width="254" height="250" style="width:2.6458in;height:2.6041in" src="part7.D47F3D36" align="left" v:shapes="_x0000_s1026"><![endif]><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>