<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><i><font size="+1">Chandra:</font></i></p>
<p><font size="+1">Let's begin with your question at the end. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">It is a good and a challenging question in so far
as we treat magnetism in our everyday live in a way which does
not reflect the true physics behind it. Normally if we have to
do it with magnetism, then it is a magnetic dipole. And when we
measure a magnetic field we use another magnetic dipole, i.e. we
measure the force or the angular momentum onto this test dipole.</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">The clean way to measure a magnetic field is to
use an electric test charge. If there is a force acting on the
test charge we have to check whether this force can be explained
by the presence of another charge using the Coulomb law. Then we
have to build the difference between the force given by the
Coulomb law and the real force observed. This difference is
"magnetism". <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">If we say that the earth has a magnetic field, we
mean that it is a magnetic dipole. And we measure the field strength
by the use of another magnetic dipole, we may call the latter one
a "test-dipole". <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">Now your question regarding the Earth. To measure
the magnetic field of the Earth physically, one should use an
electrical test charge and measure the force on it. Now, if the
earth is not electrically charged, the result will be 0. That
means no magnetic field is detected. Should now the observer move
together with his charge in relation to the Earch, there will be
a force. That means during his motion he will see a magnetic
field. - This answers your question how it can be achieved that
an observer does not see a magnetic field. Normally he will not
see it anyway. Our daily experience is of course different.
Because if someone starts to measure the magnetism of the earth
he will use a dipole as said above; with the conclusion that
there is a magnetic field. And it will be extremely difficult (I
think impossible) to move a dipole so that it will not see a
magnetic field. The reason is simple. In a magnetic dipole,
which is generally a coil with a current in it, there are always
charges at some position in the coil which are in a motion state
to the moving charges in the Earth, so one will register
magnetism.</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">You mention a "magnetic body". I do not feel that
this is a good way to name it. The magnetic body at the end is
an electric charge. And that one is only "magnetic" if it is viewed
from a certain perspective.</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">Then you say: </font><font size="+1"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">A propagating EM wave
has oscillating E and B vectors. A dipole oscillation induces
oscillating E, which generates its own restoring force B, ...</span>
Please have in mind that this is the understanding of
Maxwell's theory. But Maxwell is good for the practical use of
electromagnetism, but it does not reflect the cause of
magnetism. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">If you have general doubts about my description
of magnetism I should say that all this is not my idea but main
stream physics, can be found in textbooks e.g. about SR. However
ignored by most practising main stream physicists. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">Albrecht</font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 26.02.2018 um 00:25 schrieb
Roychoudhuri, Chandra:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BN6PR05MB323428FCAAD81E1551EBAB7193C20@BN6PR05MB3234.namprd05.prod.outlook.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:210265128;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:1952207248 397949086 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-text:"\(%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:.75in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
margin-left:.75in;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-tab-stop:1.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-tab-stop:1.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:2.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-tab-stop:2.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-tab-stop:3.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:3.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-tab-stop:4.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-tab-stop:4.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1027" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">Wolf:</span></i></b><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">I think, I am more
along the line of your thinking.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099"><o:p> </o:p></span></i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">Albrecht:
<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">Now I am realizing
that magnetism is a very important field (pun intended
</span><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:#000099">J</span><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099"> that I do not fully
understand. Intuitively I disagree with the explanation that
“magnetic field” EMERGES only due to RELATIVE VELOCITY
between a charge and an <b><i>observer</i></b>. Relative
velocity may change the quantification by our instrument of
what already exist in nature. I submit, I do not have good
counter theory.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">On a different angle,
we human are mere interpreters of data, send to our neural
network, whether by our internal body-sensors or by reading
“dials” of external sensors (instruments).
<b><i>Interactants, inside our instruments that generate the
data, are the real “observers”</i></b>, if we must use
this word..<b><i> Humans are not the observers, just
interpreters.
</i></b>Therefore, the job of humans should be to develop
theories that directly tries to model the
<b><i>interaction processes</i></b> going on between the
interactants inside the instruments, or in nature. Our
interpretations can vary widely from person to person; but
the physical transformations experienced by the interactants
inside our instruments follow ontological (existing) rules
of operation in nature. That is why we can get re-producible
data for the same interaction process. This is the bedrock
of causal physics. We can modify the strengths of
interactions by introducing changes in the interaction
parameter in diverse ways, including relative velocity.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099"> Unfortunately,
my expertise on magnetism is quite limited. However, as of
now, I am reluctant to accept that magnetism
<b><i>appears</i></b> only as SR implicates. In my
stationary CTF model, everything observable and their
properties do emerge due to dynamic movements. But they are
real, not “relative”. Can we really claim that magnetism is
like Doppler Effect? The measured frequency shift is solely
dependent on the relative velocity. However, the frequency
of the emitted radiation is the real physical parameter of a
physical entity, an EM wave packet. That is why Doppler
shift varies with the relative velocity.<b><i> Does the
strength of magnetic field changes with the relative
velocity of the detector with respect to the magnetic
body?</i></b> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">Another angle. A
propagating EM wave has oscillating E and B vectors. A
dipole oscillation induces oscillating E, which generates
its own restoring force B, thereby, generating the
perpetually oscillating and propagating wave packet in the <b><i>stationary</i></b>
CTF. In the biological world, cellular magnetism plays wide
ranges of important functions. I will have read up on these
phenomena.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">Let me pose a
question.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">Earth and many other
planets have magnetic fields due to motions in their cores.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">Can an external
magnetic sensor be forced to read “null magnetic field” by
giving it the right velocity in the right direction?
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#000099">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">
General
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]<b>On
Behalf Of </b>Albrecht Giese<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, February 23, 2018 3:02 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Foundational questions
Tension field stable particles<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Hi Wolf, and hi Chandra,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">comments and answers down in
the text:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Am 23.02.2018 um 05:28 schrieb Wolfgang
Baer:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p>Albrecht:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">"Whenever an observer is in
a magnetic field, he can find a motion state so that the
magnetic field disappears."</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">I've heard this many times
but now that you said it, and I'm no longer a student so I
have time to wonder ,
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">there is a coil of wire in
front of me I feel a magnetic field exactly how would I
move to make it disappear? And what other forces would I
experience to maintain that motion?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">This may be
explainable stepwise. In the first step use a coil of wire
with only one moving charge in it. Now have a test charge at
the side outside the coil. This test charge will see the
electrostatic force according to the Coulomb law, but
nothing more. If this test charge is not at rest but moving
then in the frame of the test charge nothing changes,
Coulomb still applies. But if an observer at rest measures
the electrostatic force between both in
<u>his </u>frame, he will see a different force acting on
the test charge. This can be also calculated using the
Lorentz transformation with respect to force. This
difference is called "magnetism". If now the observer moves
with the test charge he will only see the electrostatic
force like the test charge itself does, so no magnetism. <br>
If there in not only one charge in the coil but a lot of
them, there will be a superposition of all applying forces.
Now an observer who wants to escape the magnetic field will
have to find a new frame which takes into account this
superposition.
<br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">The electron velocity in a
wire is quite low and I can increase the current and keep
the velocity the same thus increase the magnetic field so
if I rotate around the center axis of the loop I can make
the charges stand still and there should be no magnetic
field - maybe but now we have to ask how do I measure the
magnetic field to reach this conclusion?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">A magnetic
field is generally measured in the way that the force on a
charge is measured and the result is compared to the
expected Coulomb force. If there is an excess of force, it
is magnetism.</span><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">well if I place another wire
loop the electrons in both wires move at the same velocity
and by the argument above they would not "see" the
electrons in the other ring moving but they would
certainly feel a magnetic field and the two loops would
attract each other</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">The
electrons in one loop will of course "see" the electrons in
the other one. If both wires are overcharged with electrons
then there will be the repelling Coulomb force. But in the
normal case in practise the wires are electrically neutral.
And a current means that negative charges (here electrons)
are moving into one direction and positive charges (the
corresponding positive "holes" of charge) are moving into
the other direction. Now, what will a test electron notice
which moves outside along the wire? It will see the charges
moving into the opposite direction relativistically
contracted, the co-moving ones not (or precisely: extended).
And so the test electron will see a different density of
charges (for the positive and negative ones) and so a
resulting field (which an electron at rest will not see).
The resulting force which is only noticeable by a moving
test charge is called magnetism.
<br>
<br>
There is a video of Versitasium which shows this quite
illustrative:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TKSfAkWWN0"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TKSfAkWWN0</a><br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">What am I missing?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Was this
understandable?<br>
Albrecht<br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Wolf </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Research Director<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 2/22/2018 11:26 AM, Albrecht Giese
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Chandra,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">I like very much what you
have written here. Particularly what you say about
"time" which physically means oscillations. That is what
one should keep in mind when thinking about relativity.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">However in one point I
have to object. That is your judgement of the parameter</span>
<span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">µ</span>.
<span style="font-size:13.5pt">
I think that it is a result from the historical fact
that magnetism was detected long time earlier than
electricity. So magnetism plays a great role in our view
of physics which does not reflect its role there. We
know since about 100 years that magnetism is not a
primary phenomenon but an apparent effect, a side effect
of the electric field which is caused by the finiteness
of c. If c would be infinite there would not be any
magnetism. This is given by the equation
</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">c<sup>2</sup>
= (1/ϵµ)</span><span style="font-size:13.5pt"> which you
have mentioned. This equation should be better written
as
</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">µ =
(1/c<sup>2</sup>ϵ) </span><span style="font-size:13.5pt">
to reflect this physical fact, the dependency of the
magnetism on c.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">The symmetry between
electricity and magnetism is suggested by Maxwell's
equation. These equations are mathematically very
elegant and well usable in practice. But they do not
reflect the physical reality. Easiest visible is the
fact that we have electrical monopoles but no magnetic
monopoles. Einstein has described this fact by saying:
Whenever an observer is in a magnetic field, he can find
a motion state so that the magnetic field disappears. -
This is as we know not possible for an electric field.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:13.5pt">I think that we have
discussed this earlier. Do you remember?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:13.5pt">Albrecht</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Am 21.02.2018 um 00:00 schrieb
Roychoudhuri, Chandra:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><i>“We nee</i><i><span
style="font-size:14.0pt">d a geometry in which both
space and time are curved back on themselves to
provide a donut in which the forces Fem, Fgi,
Fcm,Fmc are self contained eigen states at each
action quanta.
</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Does
any of this suggest a tension field you might be
thinking about??”</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">Yes, Wolf,
we need to model mathematically the “twists and turns”
of different intrinsic potential gradients embedded in
CTF (Complex Tension Field) to create stationary
self-looped oscillations (<b><i>field-particles</i></b>).
Maxwell achieved that for the propagating linear
excitations using his brilliant observations of using
the double differentiation – giving us the EM wave
equation. We need to find non-propagating (stationary
– Newton’s first law) self-looped oscillations – the
in-phase ones will be stable, others will “break
apart” with different life-times depending upon how
far they are from the in-phase closed-loop conditions.
The successes of the mathematical oscillatory dynamic
model could be judged by the number of predicted
properties the theory can find for the <b><i>field-particles,</i></b>
which we have measured so far. The physical CTF must
remain stationary holding 100% of the cosmic energy. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"> However,
I would not attempt to keep the primacy of Relativity
by trying to keep the Space-Time 4-D concept intact.
If we want to capture the ontological reality; we must
imagine and visualize the potential <b><i>foundational</i></b>
physical process and represent that with a set of
algebraic symbols and call them the primary parameters
of “different grades”. During constructing
mathematical theories, it is of prime importance to
introduce consciously this concept of “primary”, vs.
“secondary”, vs. “tertiary”, etc., physical parameters
related to any observable physical phenomenon. The
physical parameter that dictates the core existence of
an entity in nature should be considered as primary.
However, it is not going to be easy because of the
complexities in the different interaction processes –
different parameters take key role in transferring the
energy in different interactions. Besides, our
ignorance is still significantly broad compared to the
“validated” knowledge we have gathered about our
universe. Here is a glaring example. νλ = c = (1/ϵµ).
If I am doing atomic physics, ν is of primary
importance because of the quantum resonance with ν and
the QM energy exchange rule is “hν”. “λ” changes
from medium to medium. If I am doing Astrophysics, ϵ
and µ for free space, are of primary significance;
even though people tend to use “c”, while missing out
the fundamental roles of ϵ and µ as some of the core
building blocks of the universe. Funny thing is that
the ϵ and µ of free space were recognized well before
Maxwell synthesized Electromagnetism.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"> With
this background, I want underscore that the “running
time, “t” is of critical importance in our formulation
of the dynamic universe. And, yet “t’ is not a
directly measurable physical parameter of any object
in this universe. What we measure is really the
frequency, or its inverse, the oscillation periods of
different physical oscillators in this universe. So,
frequency can be dilated or contracted by controlling
the ambient physical parameter of the environment that
surrounds and INFLUENCES the oscillator. The running
time cannot be dilated or contracted; even though
Minkowsky introduced this “dilation” concept. This is
the reason why I have been pushing for the
introduction in physics thinking the Interaction
Process Mapping Epistemology (IPM-E). </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:14.0pt;color:windowtext">Chandra.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">
General [<a
href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]<b>On
Behalf Of </b>Wolfgang Baer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, February 19, 2018 10:56 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Foundational
questions Tension field stable particles</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Candra:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in"> Let’s
consider your tension filed is a medium underlying the
experience of space composed of charge and mass density
spread out in the cross-section of a time loop..
Coordinate frame cells of
<i>small enough</i> sizes can be described by constant
enough mass and charge densities in each cell. For small
enough cells the mass and charge values concentrated at
their centers may be used in stead of the densities. The
resulting field of center values can take any pattern
that satisfies the extended dAlambert principle. Besides
the classic electro-magnetic Fem and gravito-inertial
force Fgi I postulate forces tat hold charge and mass
together Fcm, Fmc. This condition assures mass charge
centers in each cell appear at locations of balanced
forces. Each pattern which satisfies this condition
represents a static state of the loop in which the
patterns are fixed for the lifetime of the loop.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b> </b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>The Charge-Mass Separation Vector
and Equilibrium States</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in">The physical
size of the space is its volume. The volume (Vol) of
space is the sum of the infinitesimal volumes dVol of
each of the cells composing that space “Vol = ∫<sub>all
space</sub> dVol”. These infinitesimal volumes are
calculated from the mass-charge density extensions in
each cell when viewed externally as shown in figure
4.3-3a . The physical volume depends upon the mass
charge separation pattern of the equilibrium state the
system being modeled exists in.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In CAT the extension of a
cell can be calculated as follows. In each cell the
distance between the center of charge and mass is a
vector d<b>ζ.</b> The projection of this vector onto the
degrees of freedom directions available for the charge
and mass to move in the generalized coordinate space
allows us to expansion this vector as,
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eq. 4.3-1 <b>dζ
=</b> dζ<sub>t</sub><b>∙u<sub>t</sub></b> + dζ<sub>x</sub><b>∙u<sub>x</sub>
</b>+ dζ<sub>y</sub><b>∙u<sub>y</sub> </b>+ dζ<sub>z</sub><b>∙u<sub>z</sub>
+…</b> dζ<sub>f</sub><b>∙u<sub>f</sub> +…,</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b> </b>where the <b>u<sub>f</sub></b>’s
are the unit vectors. A space limited to Cartesian
3-space is characterized by three x,y,z directions, but
CAT models a generalized space that encompasses all
sensor modalities not only the optical ones. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The volume of a cell
calculated from the diagonal expansion vector “<b>dζ”</b>
by multiplying all non zero coefficients,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eq. 4.3-2 dVol =
dζ<sub>t</sub><b>∙</b>dζ<sub>x</sub><b>∙</b>dζ<sub>y</sub><b>∙</b>dζ<sub>z</sub><b>∙…∙</b>dζ<sub>f</sub><b>∙…
.</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The shape of this volume
is determined by the direction of the expansion vector
which in turn is determined by the direction and
strength of forces pulling the charge and mass apart.
The direction of pull depends upon the number of
dimensions available in the generalized coordinates of
the media. The forces must be in equilibrium but exact
equilibrium pattern depends upon which global loop
equilibrium state “Ζ” the event being modeled is in.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In the simplest
equilibrium state the masses and charges are collocated.
This implies the internal forward propagating in time
forces F<sub>cm</sub>,F<sub>mc</sub>, and backward
propagating in time force F<sub>mc</sub>*,F<sub>cm</sub>*
are zero, and if there are no internal force pulling the
charges and masses together then sum of the remaining
exterior gravito-electric forces pulling the charge and
mass apart must separately be zero precisely at the
collocation point. A trivial condition that satisfies
these equations is when all forces are zero. In this
case there is no action in the media and no action for
expanding the coordinate frame defining a volume of
space. We are back to a formless blob of zero volume,
where all charges and masses are at the same point. This
is the absolute ground state of material, one level of
something above nothing. The big bang before the energy
of action flow is added.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in"><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter" />
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0" />
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" />
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t" />
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="" style='position:absolute;left:0;text-align:left;margin-left:0;margin-top:0;width:190.5pt;height:187.5pt;z-index:251658240;mso-wrap-distance-left:0;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:0;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:left;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical-relative:line' o:allowoverlap="f">
<v:imagedata src="mailbox:///C:/Users/AL/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Profiles/lthhzma2.default/Mail/pop3.strato-12.de/Inbox?number=6063&header=quotebody&part=1.1.2&filename=image001.gif" o:title="part4.D7CE2B59.3DB468BA@a-giese" />
<w:wrap type="square"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]--><img
style="width:2.6458in;height:2.6041in"
src="cid:part5.E4CF0B68.8290838F@a-giese.de"
v:shapes="_x0000_s1026" class="" align="left"
height="250" width="254"><!--[endif]-->To exemplify
the methods we consider an equilibrium state of a single
isolated cell whose only degree of freedom is the time
direction. This means the volume in all space directions
are infinitesimally small and the volume can be
considered a single line of extension “ΔVol = ΔT<sub>w</sub>
= ∫dζ<sub><span style="font-size:14.0pt">t</span></sub><span
style="font-size:14.0pt"> “
</span>along the time direction as shown in the god’s
eye perspective of figure 4.3-6. In this situation we
can consider charges and masses to be point particles.
Forces as well as action can only propagate along the
material length of the line time line represented in
space as “Qw”. We now list the sequence of changes that
can propagate through around the equilibrium positions
indicated by numbers in parenthesis.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(1)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span><!--[endif]-->The upper charge is pushed
from its equilibrium position (filled icon) forward
along the time line<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(2)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span><!--[endif]-->It exerts a force “Fem” on
the left charge pushing it forward while feeling a
reaction force “Fem*” that retards it back to its
equilibrium position<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(3)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span><!--[endif]-->While the left charge is
moved from equilibrium it exerts an internal “Fcm” force
on the bottom mass while feeling a reaction force “Fcm*”
which returns it to equilibrium.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(4)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span><!--[endif]-->While the bottom mass is
moved from equilibrium it exerts a force “Fgi” on the
right mass while feeling a reaction force “Fgi*” which
returns it to equilibrium.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.75in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo2">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="mso-list:Ignore">(5)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span><!--[endif]-->While the right mass is
moved from equilibrium it exerts a force “Fmc” on the
upper charge while feeling a reaction force “Fmc*”
which returns it to equilibrium. We are now back to (1).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in">If the
system is isolated there is no dissipation into other
degrees of freedom and the oscillation continues to move
as a compression wave around the “Qw” time line
circumference forever. The graph however is static and
shows a fixed amount of action indicated by the shaded
arrows around the time line. Motion in “block” models is
produced by the velocity of the observer or model
operator as he moves around the time line. From our
god’s eye perspective an action density is permanently
painted on the clock dial and thereby describes an total
event. The last degree of freedom events are rather
trivial
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We need a geometry in
which both space and time are curved back on themselves
to provide a donut in which the forces Fem, Fgi, Fcm,Fmc
are self contained eigen states at each action quanta.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Does any of this suggest a tension
field you might be thinking about??<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Research Director<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 1/24/2018 7:20 PM, Roychoudhuri,
Chandra wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">1. Yes, I have submitted an essay.
FQXi has not sent the approval link yet.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. Replacement of our SPIE conf.
Without a supporting infrastructure to replace
SPIE-like support, it is very difficult to manage. I
will try NSF during the last week of May. Do you
want to start negotiating with some out-of-box
European groups? <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">3. Re-starting afresh from the
bottom up is the only way to start re-building a
unified field theory. It is futile to force-fit
whole bunch of different theories that were
structured differently at different states of human
cultural epoch.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">
<p class="MsoNormal">Sent from my iPhone<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
On Jan 24, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Wolfgang Baer <<a
href="mailto:wolf@nascentinc.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@nascentinc.com</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p>Chandra:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Just rereading your 2015 paper "Urgency of
evolution..."<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I love the sentiment " This is a good time to
start iteratively re-evaluating and
restructuring all the foundational postulates
behind all the working theories"<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Did you write a paper for FQXi?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I sent one in <a
href="https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3043"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3043</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Is there any chance to get a replacement for the SPIE conference, one that would expand the questions </span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt">beyond the nature of light?</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Wolf</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Research Director<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication
from the Nature of Light and Particles General
Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu"
moz-do-not-send="true">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</a><br>
<a href="<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de" moz-do-not-send="true">phys@a-giese.de</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de" moz-do-not-send="true">phys@a-giese.de</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>