<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Two questions:</p>
<p> 1) Nina Sotina's paper in The Vigier 10 proceedings points out
something that has puzzled me for a long time. Schroedinger's 1926
paper introducing the Wave function was a real classic function
not an imaginary. In october 1926 Von Madelung derived a classic
hydrodynamic formulation of quantum theory but did so from the
Schroedinger equation with an imaginary wave function. Both
Schroedinger's and Madelung's derivation suggests they thought QM
waves were real, an interpretation, which I tend to favor. <br>
</p>
<p>Were and who introduced the imaginary? </p>
<p>2) Along those lines I just ran into <br>
</p>
<p> THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr.
Randell Mills</p>
<p>The guy knows a lot of physics and claims he can explain the
results of quantum theory from purely classical physics.</p>
<p>His claim that the electron is a charge shell rather than a
probability is similar to my CAT theory, only my rational is to <br>
</p>
<div class="moz-forward-container">analyze quantum theory as a
mental projection of the observer i.e. as the physics of the
observer. <br>
<br>
Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone heard of him?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/</a>
<p class="MsoNormal">Theory Overview:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-tab-count:1"> </span>The
claim that classic physics “ only the simple laws of Newton’s
Mechanics, Maxwell’s equations of electricity, magnetism, and
electrodynamics, and the fundamental constants of nature” are
adequate to explain “All observables from quarks to cosmos … in
closed-form analytical expressions containing fundamental
constants only.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <span style="mso-tab-count:1"> </span>“According
to Mills GUT-CP, nature is classical. Electrons, when bound in
an atom, are considered to be discrete two-dimensional spherical
membranes of charge and current that completely surround the
nucleus as a bubble.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> “Mills GUT-CP is a <em>confirmable</em>
theory, … Data sets include the electron spin, g-factor,
ionization energies of 1-20 electron atoms and ions (400
states); the state lifetimes and line intensities of hydrogen;
the excited states of helium; the excited states of H2, the
relationships between the masses of fundamental particles; the
bond distances, energies, angles, and dipole moments of over 800
molecules; and the parameters of a variety of extended solids.
From the molecular theory, Brilliant Light Power has launched a
molecular modeling subsidiary, <a
href="http://www.millsian.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">Millsian
Inc</a>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> “ The essence of GUTCP is that every
solution is for the true or real source of the observable
wherein any solution of an observable as the inherent
information for all observables that can be related to that
observable.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <br>
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"> </b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"> Here
is a a site to down load his book<br>
</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"> </b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf</a></b></p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Wolfgang Baer
Nascent Systems Inc.
380W. Carmel Valley Rd.
Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USA
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Support@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
</div>
</body>
</html>