<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Andre:</p>
<p>your paper "The Hydrogen Atom Fundamental Resonance States"
available at the site below is indeed a great work of interest.
After a very brief review let me ask is I have this right</p>
<p>You are claiming the quantum jumps can be calculated as
continuous electromagnetic interactions</p>
<p>That "electromagnetic bremsstrahlung photons could be defined as
self-sustaining their own motion in a localized manner without the
need for any underlying ether, from the simple interaction of
their own internal mutually inducing E and B fields"End section 1.</p>
<p>By "localized manner" Does this mean a self contained E, B field
that imposes its own boundary conditions? <br>
</p>
<p>When you say without "ether" does this mean without space ? Or
are the fields still conceived as propagating in some space.</p>
<p>WOlf<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. ;
Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/6/2018 1:52 AM, Andrew Meulenberg
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOODe7Fa3GnZJni3AMeC4nwaTN65kTHE+jYvkzu9q92URiAtBw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Dear Andre,<br>
<br>
</div>
Thank you for providing the link to your paper. I'm only 1/10
the way thru it and have already found 1/2 dozen points (with
references) that are important bases to my views of physics.
It is nice to know that some of them have historical
precedent. I have 2 papers, which I need to publish, that can
use yours as a reference.<br>
<br>
</div>
Andrew M.<br>
_ _ _ <br>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:53
PM, André Michaud <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">srp2@srpinc.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div class="m_7917997588320269680userStyles"
style="font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:#000000">
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Hi
Wolfgang,</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">To
your first question, </span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From
equation (5-22) and afferent text, page
132 in reference "Quantum Physics of
Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and
Particles - Second edition", by R.
Eisberg and R.Resnick, Schrödinger's
equation had an imaginary part from the
get go.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Initially,
Schrödinger meant the wave function to
represent a resonance volume within
which the localized electron remained
captive when in bound state:</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><a
href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-<wbr>7503469_84158.htm</a></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Best
Regards</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">André</span></span></span></p>
<footer
class="m_7917997588320269680signatureDivContainer">
<footer
class="m_7917997588320269680signatureContainer"
style="display:inline">---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
<a href="http://www.gsjournal.net/"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.gsjournal.net/</a><br>
<a
href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-<wbr>2740-5684</a><br>
<a href="http://www.srpinc.org/"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.srpinc.org/</a></footer>
</footer>
<footer
class="m_7917997588320269680replyforwardcontainer"><br>
<div>
<div class="h5">
<br>
<span>On Sat, 5 May 2018 19:25:17 -0700,
Wolfgang Baer wrote:</span><br>
<br>
<p>Two questions:</p>
<p>1) Nina Sotina's paper in The Vigier 10
proceedings points out something that
has puzzled me for a long time.
Schroedinger's 1926 paper introducing
the Wave function was a real classic
function not an imaginary. In october
1926 Von Madelung derived a classic
hydrodynamic formulation of quantum
theory but did so from the Schroedinger
equation with an imaginary wave
function. Both Schroedinger's and
Madelung's derivation suggests they
thought QM waves were real, an
interpretation, which I tend to favor.</p>
<p>Were and who introduced the imaginary?</p>
<p>2) Along those lines I just ran into</p>
<p>THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF CLASSICAL
QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr. Randell Mills</p>
<p>The guy knows a lot of physics and
claims he can explain the results of
quantum theory from purely classical
physics.</p>
<p>His claim that the electron is a charge
shell rather than a probability is
similar to my CAT theory, only my
rational is to</p>
<div
class="m_7917997588320269680moz-forward-container">analyze
quantum theory as a mental projection of
the observer i.e. as the physics of the
observer.<br>
<br>
Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone heard
of him?<br>
<br>
<a
href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://brilliantlightpower.<wbr>com/theory-overview/</a>
<p class="MsoNormal">Theory Overview:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The claim that
classic physics “ only the simple laws
of Newton’s Mechanics, Maxwell’s
equations of electricity, magnetism,
and electrodynamics, and the
fundamental constants of nature” are
adequate to explain “All observables
from quarks to cosmos … in closed-form
analytical expressions containing
fundamental constants only.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“According to Mills
GUT-CP, nature is classical.
Electrons, when bound in an atom, are
considered to be discrete
two-dimensional spherical membranes of
charge and current that completely
surround the nucleus as a bubble.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“Mills GUT-CP is a
<i>confirmable</i> theory, … Data sets
include the electron spin, g-factor,
ionization energies of 1-20 electron
atoms and ions (400 states); the state
lifetimes and line intensities of
hydrogen; the excited states of
helium; the excited states of H2, the
relationships between the masses of
fundamental particles; the bond
distances, energies, angles, and
dipole moments of over 800 molecules;
and the parameters of a variety of
extended solids. From the molecular
theory, Brilliant Light Power has
launched a molecular modeling
subsidiary, <a
href="http://www.millsian.com/"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Millsian Inc</a>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“ The essence of
GUTCP is that every solution is for
the true or real source of the
observable wherein any solution of an
observable as the inherent information
for all observables that can be
related to that observable.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Here is a a site
to down load his book</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><a
class="m_7917997588320269680moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://brilliantlightpower.<wbr>com/wp-content/uploads/theory/<wbr>GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-<wbr>121517.pdf</a></b></p>
<pre class="m_7917997588320269680moz-signature" cols="72">--
Wolfgang Baer
Nascent Systems Inc.
380W. Carmel Valley Rd.
Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USA
<a class="m_7917997588320269680moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Support@NascentInc.com" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication
from the Nature of Light and Particles General
Discussion List at <a
href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">srp2@srpinc.org</a><br>
<br>
<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Click
here to unsubscribe</a><br>
</footer>
</div>
</div>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from
the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion
List at <a href="mailto:mules333@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">mules333@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.<wbr>natureoflightandparticles.org/<wbr>options.cgi/general-<wbr>natureoflightandparticles.org/<wbr>mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&<wbr>unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>