<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="userStyles" style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000;">
<p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Hi Wolfgang,</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Thank you so much for the offer. I never heard of resonance antennas.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">I am definitely interested. I am a beginner in resonance transmission. All pertaining refs will be welcome.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">I am planning to completely refresh in all aspects of harmonic oscillation resonance for the coming months, time allowing, to establish a fresh start before attempting to tackle what remains to be addressed, that is resonance transitions between stable/metastable states (emission and absorption).</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">I became aware of the exact direction that remained to be clarified only as I was writing my last paper, so I never looked closely at this before. </span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">I really need to study the basics in depth. For now, I just want to let all these new maths (for me) soak in and seamlessly merge with the rest to eventually be able to follow new trails. I am in no hurry with this, now that the trail is clear.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Quite possible that others already up to speed might get there first, which would be fine with me.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Best Regards</span></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span lang="EN-CA"><span style="line-height: 115%;">André</span></span></span></span><br>
---
<footer class="signatureDivContainer">
<footer class="signatureContainer" style="display:inline;">André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
http://www.gsjournal.net/<br>
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684<br>
http://www.srpinc.org/</footer>
</footer>
<footer class="replyforwardcontainer"><br>
<br>
<span>On Wed, 9 May 2018 12:13:33 -0700, Wolfgang Baer <wolf@nascentinc.com> wrote:</wolf@nascentinc.com></span><br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>Andre:</p>
<p>Have you heard of resonance antennas . These are dynamic antennas that expand the effective antenna size so it can capture energy from a much larger crossection. It is a near field phenomena discovered and used in small transistor radios, and nano wires</p>
<p>If it had been known in the 1900 we would probably not have invented photons.</p>
<p>Let me know if interested and I can dig up some references</p>
<p>WOlf</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/6/2018 12:43 PM, André Michaud wrote:</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:201805061943.w46JhhUJ002856@mail124c0.megamailservers.com" type="cite"> </blockquote>
</footer>
</div>
<title></title>
<div class="userStyles" style=" font-family: Arial; font-size:
12pt; color: #000000;">
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Dear Wolfgang,</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Thank you for your appreciation.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">I'll answer inline for consistency.</span></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\
New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Best Regards</span></span></span></span><br>
---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.gsjournal.net/">http://www.gsjournal.net/</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.srpinc.org/">http://www.srpinc.org/</a><br>
<br>
<span>On Sun, 6 May 2018 10:56:11 -0700, Wolfgang Baer <wolf@nascentinc.com> wrote:</wolf@nascentinc.com></span><br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>Andre:</p>
<p>your paper "The Hydrogen Atom Fundamental Resonance States" available at the site below is indeed a great work of interest. After a very brief review let me ask is I have this right</p>
<p>You are claiming the quantum jumps can be calculated as continuous electromagnetic interactions<br>
</p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span style="color:#c00000">This is what Schrödinger was planning to promote by introducing the wave function, in agreement with de Broglie.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span style="color:#c00000">I also am convinced that transitions between stationary states are continuously progressive resonance processes. Energy transfer via resonance processes are known to happen and have been mathematized (Förster resonance transfers for example). </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span style="color:#c00000">If electrons really are in resonance states as de Broglie concluded, It think that there is no inconsistency with considering that bremmsstrahlung electromagnetic photons could be emitted by means of such progressive processes, and that the transitions between stable/metastable states could be directly linked via such emission.<br>
<br>
Actually, if nobody tackles this issue before I become knowledgeable enough to do it myself, this is exactly where I am eventually headed.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>That "electromagnetic bremsstrahlung photons could be defined as self-sustaining their own motion in a localized manner without the need for any underlying ether, from the simple interaction of their own internal mutually inducing E and B fields"End section 1.</p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><br>
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span style="color:#c00000">If electromagnetic bremmsstrahlung photons are emitted via such progressive continuous mechanical processes, given that the Kaufman experiment and the relation that Marmet discovered between the relativistic mass increment and the energy of the electron magnetic field, then such bremmsstrahlung photons can only be electromagnetic in nature by definition. If they have a such an intrinsic magnetic field, then they also have a matching intrinsic electric field. To be consistent with Maxwell, they have to mutually induce each other, which means that they are of default equal density by structure.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span style="color:#c00000">This very structure, from considerations drawn from the work of Kaurman and Marmet mandates that half their total complement of energy be its momentum energy propelling the other electromagnetic half that oscillates electromagnetically transversally (to be consistent with Maxwell).</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p>By "localized manner" Does this mean a self contained E, B field that imposes its own boundary conditions?<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span style="color:#c00000">Actually, the E and B fields are "mathematical representations" of the intensity/density of the "really physically existing energy" of which the physically existing bremmsstrahlung photon is made that we use to "measure" the really existing energy. It has to be the actual "physically existing energy" that oscillates in a self-sustaining manner. The E and B fields are only mathematical representations that allow us to think about this energy and to calculate it.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p>When you say without "ether" does this mean without space ? Or are the fields still conceived as propagating in some space.<br>
</p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span style="color:#c00000">The Ether was conceived of as an underlying substance that would be the "material" that would materially oscillate and transmit Maxwell's EM waves as he conceived them. But if electromagnetic bremmsstrahlung photons self-sustain their own motion, there is no need any more for the very concept of "ether".</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span style="color:#c00000">Of course these photons would still propagate in vacuum, but don't need any underlying "ether" to transmit them. They auto-propel at the default equilibrium speed of light in empty vacuum, so to speak.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span style="color:#c00000">Space, vacuum, to me is only the empty vacuum in which all that we can observe exists, whatever it might be. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#b22222;">André</span></p>
<p>WOlf</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. ;
Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/6/2018 1:52 AM, Andrew Meulenberg wrote:</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:CAOODe7Fa3GnZJni3AMeC4nwaTN65kTHE+jYvkzu9q92URiAtBw@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Dear Andre,<br>
</div>
Thank you for providing the link to your paper. I'm only 1/10 the way thru it and have already found 1/2 dozen points (with references) that are important bases to my views of physics. It is nice to know that some of them have historical precedent. I have 2 papers, which I need to publish, that can use yours as a reference.<br>
</div>
Andrew M.<br>
_ _ _
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:53 PM, André Michaud <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">srp2@srpinc.org</a>></span> wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div class="m_7917997588320269680userStyles" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:#000000">
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Hi Wolfgang,</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">To your first question, </span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From equation (5-22) and afferent text, page 132 in reference "Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles - Second edition", by R. Eisberg and R.Resnick, Schrödinger's equation had an imaginary part from the get go.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Initially, Schrödinger meant the wave function to represent a resonance volume within which the localized electron remained captive when in bound state:</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><a href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-<wbr>7503469_84158.htm</a></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Best Regards</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">André</span></span></span></p>
<br>
---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
<a href="http://www.gsjournal.net/" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">http://www.gsjournal.net/</a><br>
<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-<wbr>2740-5684</a><br>
<a href="http://www.srpinc.org/" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">http://www.srpinc.org/</a>
<div>
<div class="h5"><br>
<span>On Sat, 5 May 2018 19:25:17 -0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:</span><br>
<p>Two questions:</p>
<p>1) Nina Sotina's paper in The Vigier 10 proceedings points out something that has puzzled me for a long time. Schroedinger's 1926 paper introducing the Wave function was a real classic function not an imaginary. In october 1926 Von Madelung derived a classic hydrodynamic formulation of quantum theory but did so from the Schroedinger equation with an imaginary wave function. Both Schroedinger's and Madelung's derivation suggests they thought QM waves were real, an interpretation, which I tend to favor.</p>
<p>Were and who introduced the imaginary?</p>
<p>2) Along those lines I just ran into</p>
<p>THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr. Randell Mills</p>
<p>The guy knows a lot of physics and claims he can explain the results of quantum theory from purely classical physics.</p>
<p>His claim that the electron is a charge shell rather than a probability is similar to my CAT theory, only my rational is to</p>
<div class="m_7917997588320269680moz-forward-container">analyze quantum theory as a mental projection of the observer i.e. as the physics of the observer.<br>
<br>
Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone heard of him?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">http://brilliantlightpower.<wbr>com/theory-overview/</a>
<p class="MsoNormal">Theory Overview:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The claim that classic physics “ only the simple laws of Newton’s Mechanics, Maxwell’s equations of electricity, magnetism, and electrodynamics, and the fundamental constants of nature” are adequate to explain “All observables from quarks to cosmos … in closed-form analytical expressions containing fundamental constants only.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“According to Mills GUT-CP, nature is classical. Electrons, when bound in an atom, are considered to be discrete two-dimensional spherical membranes of charge and current that completely surround the nucleus as a bubble.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“Mills GUT-CP is a <i>confirmable</i> theory, … Data sets include the electron spin, g-factor, ionization energies of 1-20 electron atoms and ions (400 states); the state lifetimes and line intensities of hydrogen; the excited states of helium; the excited states of H2, the relationships between the masses of fundamental particles; the bond distances, energies, angles, and dipole moments of over 800 molecules; and the parameters of a variety of extended solids. From the molecular theory, Brilliant Light Power has launched a molecular modeling subsidiary, <a href="http://www.millsian.com/" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">Millsian Inc</a>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“ The essence of GUTCP is that every solution is for the true or real source of the observable wherein any solution of an observable as the inherent information for all observables that can be related to that observable.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Here is a a site to down load his book</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><a class="m_7917997588320269680moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">http://brilliantlightpower.<wbr>com/wp-content/uploads/theory/<wbr>GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-<wbr>121517.pdf</a></b></p>
<pre class="m_7917997588320269680moz-signature" cols="72">--
Wolfgang Baer
Nascent Systems Inc.
380W. Carmel Valley Rd.
Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USA
<a class="m_7917997588320269680moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Support@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">Wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">srp2@srpinc.org</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">Click here to unsubscribe</a></div>
</div>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:mules333@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">mules333@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" moz-do-not-send="true" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.<wbr>natureoflightandparticles.org/<wbr>options.cgi/general-<wbr>natureoflightandparticles.org/<wbr>mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&<wbr>unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>