<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Andre:</p>
<p>Have you heard of resonance antennas . These are dynamic
antennas that expand the effective antenna size so it can capture
energy from a much larger crossection. It is a near field
phenomena discovered and used in small transistor radios, and nano
wires</p>
<p>If it had been known in the 1900 we would probably not have
invented photons.</p>
<p>Let me know if interested and I can dig up some references</p>
<p>WOlf<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/6/2018 12:43 PM, André Michaud
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:201805061943.w46JhhUJ002856@mail124c0.megamailservers.com">
<title></title>
<div class="userStyles" style=" font-family: Arial; font-size:
12pt; color: #000000;">
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span
style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span
style="line-height: 115%;">Dear Wolfgang,</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span
style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span
style="line-height: 115%;">Thank you for your
appreciation.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:12pt;"><span
style="font-family: Times\ New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span
style="line-height: 115%;">I'll answer inline for
consistency.</span></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="font-family: Times\
New\ Roman, Times, serif;"><span lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height: 115%;">Best Regards</span></span></span></span>
<footer class="signatureDivContainer">
<footer class="signatureContainer" style="display:inline;">---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.gsjournal.net/">http://www.gsjournal.net/</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.srpinc.org/">http://www.srpinc.org/</a></footer>
</footer>
<footer class="replyforwardcontainer"><br>
<br>
<span>On Sun, 6 May 2018 10:56:11 -0700, Wolfgang Baer <wolf@nascentinc.com>
wrote:</wolf@nascentinc.com></span><br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<p>Andre:</p>
<p>your paper "The Hydrogen Atom Fundamental Resonance States"
available at the site below is indeed a great work of
interest. After a very brief review let me ask is I have
this right</p>
<p>You are claiming the quantum jumps can be calculated as
continuous electromagnetic interactions<br>
</p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span
style="color:#c00000">This is what Schrödinger
was planning to promote by introducing the
wave function, in agreement with de Broglie.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span
style="color:#c00000">I also am convinced that
transitions between stationary states are
continuously progressive resonance processes.
Energy transfer via resonance processes are
known to happen and have been mathematized
(Förster resonance transfers for example). </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span
style="color:#c00000">If electrons really are
in resonance states as de Broglie concluded,
It think that there is no inconsistency with
considering that bremmsstrahlung
electromagnetic photons could be emitted by
means of such progressive processes, and that
the transitions between stable/metastable
states could be directly linked via such
emission.<br>
<br>
Actually, if nobody tackles this issue before
I become knowledgeable enough to do it myself,
this is exactly where I am eventually headed.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>That "electromagnetic bremsstrahlung photons could be
defined as self-sustaining their own motion in a localized
manner without the need for any underlying ether, from the
simple interaction of their own internal mutually inducing E
and B fields"End section 1.</p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><br>
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span
style="color:#c00000">If electromagnetic
bremmsstrahlung photons are emitted via such
progressive continuous mechanical processes,
given that the Kaufman experiment and the
relation that Marmet discovered between the
relativistic mass increment and the energy of
the electron magnetic field, then such
bremmsstrahlung photons can only be
electromagnetic in nature by definition. If
they have a such an intrinsic magnetic field,
then they also have a matching intrinsic
electric field. To be consistent with Maxwell,
they have to mutually induce each other, which
means that they are of default equal density
by structure.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span
style="color:#c00000">This very structure,
from considerations drawn from the work of
Kaurman and Marmet mandates that half their
total complement of energy be its momentum
energy propelling the other electromagnetic
half that oscillates electromagnetically
transversally (to be consistent with Maxwell).</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
</p>
<p>By "localized manner" Does this mean a self contained E, B
field that imposes its own boundary conditions?<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span
style="color:#c00000">Actually, the E and B
fields are "mathematical representations" of
the intensity/density of the "really
physically existing energy" of which the
physically existing bremmsstrahlung photon is
made that we use to "measure" the really
existing energy. It has to be the actual
"physically existing energy" that oscillates
in a self-sustaining manner. The E and B
fields are only mathematical representations
that allow us to think about this energy and
to calculate it.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p>When you say without "ether" does this mean without space ?
Or are the fields still conceived as propagating in some
space.<br>
</p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span
style="color:#c00000">The Ether was conceived
of as an underlying substance that would be
the "material" that would materially oscillate
and transmit Maxwell's EM waves as he
conceived them. But if electromagnetic
bremmsstrahlung photons self-sustain their own
motion, there is no need any more for the very
concept of "ether".</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span
style="color:#c00000">Of course these photons
would still propagate in vacuum, but don't
need any underlying "ether" to transmit them.
They auto-propel at the default equilibrium
speed of light in empty vacuum, so to speak.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><span
style="color:#c00000">Space, vacuum, to me is
only the empty vacuum in which all that we can
observe exists, whatever it might be. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#b22222;">André</span></p>
<p>WOlf</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. ;
Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/6/2018 1:52 AM, Andrew
Meulenberg wrote:</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAOODe7Fa3GnZJni3AMeC4nwaTN65kTHE+jYvkzu9q92URiAtBw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Dear Andre,<br>
</div>
Thank you for providing the link to your paper. I'm only
1/10 the way thru it and have already found 1/2 dozen
points (with references) that are important bases to my
views of physics. It is nice to know that some of them
have historical precedent. I have 2 papers, which I need
to publish, that can use yours as a reference.<br>
</div>
Andrew M.<br>
_ _ _
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 5, 2018 at
11:53 PM, André Michaud <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org"
moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">srp2@srpinc.org</a>></span>
wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div class="m_7917997588320269680userStyles"
style="font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:#000000">
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Hi
Wolfgang,</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">To
your first question, </span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From
equation (5-22) and afferent text,
page 132 in reference "Quantum
Physics of Atoms, Molecules,
Solids, Nuclei, and Particles -
Second edition", by R. Eisberg and
R.Resnick, Schrödinger's equation
had an imaginary part from the get
go.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Initially,
Schrödinger meant the wave
function to represent a resonance
volume within which the localized
electron remained captive when in
bound state:</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><a
href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm"
moz-do-not-send="true"
target="_blank">http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-<wbr>7503469_84158.htm</a></span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Best
Regards</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span
style="font-size:11pt"><span
style="line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">André</span></span></span></p>
<br>
---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
<a href="http://www.gsjournal.net/"
moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">http://www.gsjournal.net/</a><br>
<a
href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684"
moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-<wbr>2740-5684</a><br>
<a href="http://www.srpinc.org/"
moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">http://www.srpinc.org/</a>
<div>
<div class="h5"><br>
<span>On Sat, 5 May 2018 19:25:17
-0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:</span><br>
<p>Two questions:</p>
<p>1) Nina Sotina's paper in The
Vigier 10 proceedings points out
something that has puzzled me for a
long time. Schroedinger's 1926 paper
introducing the Wave function was a
real classic function not an
imaginary. In october 1926 Von
Madelung derived a classic
hydrodynamic formulation of quantum
theory but did so from the
Schroedinger equation with an
imaginary wave function. Both
Schroedinger's and Madelung's
derivation suggests they thought QM
waves were real, an interpretation,
which I tend to favor.</p>
<p>Were and who introduced the
imaginary?</p>
<p>2) Along those lines I just ran
into</p>
<p>THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF
CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr.
Randell Mills</p>
<p>The guy knows a lot of physics and
claims he can explain the results of
quantum theory from purely classical
physics.</p>
<p>His claim that the electron is a
charge shell rather than a
probability is similar to my CAT
theory, only my rational is to</p>
<div
class="m_7917997588320269680moz-forward-container">analyze
quantum theory as a mental
projection of the observer i.e. as
the physics of the observer.<br>
<br>
Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone
heard of him?<br>
<br>
<a
href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/"
moz-do-not-send="true"
target="_blank">http://brilliantlightpower.<wbr>com/theory-overview/</a>
<p class="MsoNormal">Theory
Overview:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The claim that
classic physics “ only the simple
laws of Newton’s Mechanics,
Maxwell’s equations of
electricity, magnetism, and
electrodynamics, and the
fundamental constants of nature”
are adequate to explain “All
observables from quarks to cosmos
… in closed-form analytical
expressions containing fundamental
constants only.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“According to
Mills GUT-CP, nature is classical.
Electrons, when bound in an atom,
are considered to be discrete
two-dimensional spherical
membranes of charge and current
that completely surround the
nucleus as a bubble.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“Mills GUT-CP
is a <i>confirmable</i> theory, …
Data sets include the electron
spin, g-factor, ionization
energies of 1-20 electron atoms
and ions (400 states); the state
lifetimes and line intensities of
hydrogen; the excited states of
helium; the excited states of H2,
the relationships between the
masses of fundamental particles;
the bond distances, energies,
angles, and dipole moments of over
800 molecules; and the parameters
of a variety of extended solids.
From the molecular theory,
Brilliant Light Power has launched
a molecular modeling subsidiary, <a
href="http://www.millsian.com/"
moz-do-not-send="true"
target="_blank">Millsian Inc</a>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“ The essence
of GUTCP is that every solution is
for the true or real source of the
observable wherein any solution of
an observable as the inherent
information for all observables
that can be related to that
observable.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Here is a a
site to down load his book</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><a
class="m_7917997588320269680moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true"
target="_blank">http://brilliantlightpower.<wbr>com/wp-content/uploads/theory/<wbr>GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-<wbr>121517.pdf</a></b></p>
<pre class="m_7917997588320269680moz-signature" cols="72">--
Wolfgang Baer
Nascent Systems Inc.
380W. Carmel Valley Rd.
Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USA
<a class="m_7917997588320269680moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Support@NascentInc.com" moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">Wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive
communication from the Nature of Light and
Particles General Discussion List at <a
href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org"
moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">srp2@srpinc.org</a><br>
<br>
<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank">Click
here to unsubscribe</a></div>
</div>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication
from the Nature of Light and Particles General
Discussion List at <a
href="mailto:mules333@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">mules333@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
moz-do-not-send="true" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://lists.<wbr>natureoflightandparticles.org/<wbr>options.cgi/general-<wbr>natureoflightandparticles.org/<wbr>mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&<wbr>unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</footer>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>