<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:1361971218;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-831500314 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">Wolf B.: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">Sorry for my delay in replying to this interesting email.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><b><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">1.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span></i></b><![endif]><b><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">Complex representation of “Psi”: </span></i></b><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">I have attached one of our old papers where I underscore that we keep neglecting
– (i) detector’s physical response characteristic parameter and (ii) detector’s physical response time-period. Especially, in the realm of resonant QM interaction, a photo-detector must first sense out whether the incident radiation has the right QM-resonant
frequency for it to be excited as a <i>linear dipole</i>. This time period has to be at least one cycle. Computation using “cos-wt”, instead of “exp(iwt)”, shows that one needs just over a cycle of integration to match the time-averaged squared-real function
to “Psi*Psi”. So, in my book, “Causal Physics: Photon by Non-Interaction of Waves” (Taylor & Francis, 2014), I have used the phrase “Quantum Compatibility Sensing Dancing Period”, which is required by a QM-dipole to consummate the available energy through
the resonant interaction, followed by the absorption of a “quantum cupful of energy”, (hw/2'pi’), out of the passing-by EM wave energy. Copenhagen Interpretation has succeeded in propagating a culture of mysticism behind QM, even though Nature has always been
causal. This is why our causal mathematical relations have succeeded in discovering so many real interaction processes in nature.
<b><i><o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><b><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">2.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span></i></b><![endif]><b><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">There are QM intrinsic harmonic oscillations of particles, there are no waves:</span></i></b><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC"> If we express the particles
as self-looped and self-resonant doughnut-like oscillations of the Complex Tension Field (CTF), then particles can be represented as, a.exp(iwt), You may call this “w” as the
<i>de Broglie frequency</i>, instead of a wave-packet. In this model, EM waves are perpetually propagating linear excitation of the CTF. All particles are harmonic oscillators. That is why Schrodinger’s “Wave function” works so well.<b><i><o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><b><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">3.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span></i></b><![endif]><b><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">QM is glorified Classical Mechanics:
</span></i></b><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">I believe that eventually people will be able to get over the blinding successes of QM and realize that even the “Hamiltonian” was originally constructed for Classical Mechanics!<b><i><o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><b><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">4.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span></i></b><![endif]><b><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">Observer and Interpretations:
</span></i></b><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">Our <i>instruments</i>, which facilitate the interactions between the chosen entities and generate the data exploiting the physical transformations of the interactants, are the rational, causal and
un-biased OBSERVERS. We, the humans, having widely varying neural-networks, generate widely different “causal” interpretations (fortunately, constrained by mathematical logics). The scientists are not very much different from the very smart lawyers and politicians!
At least, the last two categories of people are conscious, most of the time, when they are fooling other people using “cooked-up causally connected reasoning”!!
</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:#0000CC">J</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">
<b><i><o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#0000CC">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext"> General <general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Wolfgang Baer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, May 05, 2018 10:25 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>; RL Amoroso <noeticj@mindspring.com>; af.kracklauer@web.de; Louis H Kauffman <loukau@gmail.com>; Nina Sotina <nsotina@gmail.com>; Albrecht Giese <phys@a-giese.de><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [General] CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p>Two questions:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p> 1) Nina Sotina's paper in The Vigier 10 proceedings points out something that has puzzled me for a long time. Schroedinger's 1926 paper introducing the Wave function was a real classic function not an imaginary. In october 1926 Von Madelung derived a classic
hydrodynamic formulation of quantum theory but did so from the Schroedinger equation with an imaginary wave function. Both Schroedinger's and Madelung's derivation suggests they thought QM waves were real, an interpretation, which I tend to favor.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Were and who introduced the imaginary? <o:p></o:p></p>
<p>2) Along those lines I just ran into <o:p></o:p></p>
<p> THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr. Randell Mills<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>The guy knows a lot of physics and claims he can explain the results of quantum theory from purely classical physics.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>His claim that the electron is a charge shell rather than a probability is similar to my CAT theory, only my rational is to
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">analyze quantum theory as a mental projection of the observer i.e. as the physics of the observer.
<br>
<br>
Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone heard of him?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/">http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/</a>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Theory Overview:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> The claim that classic physics “ only the simple laws of Newton’s Mechanics, Maxwell’s equations of electricity, magnetism, and electrodynamics, and the fundamental
constants of nature” are adequate to explain “All observables from quarks to cosmos … in closed-form analytical expressions containing fundamental constants only.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> “According to Mills GUT-CP, nature is classical. Electrons, when bound in an atom, are considered to be discrete two-dimensional spherical membranes of charge and current
that completely surround the nucleus as a bubble.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> “Mills GUT-CP is a
<em>confirmable</em> theory, … Data sets include the electron spin, g-factor, ionization energies of 1-20 electron atoms and ions (400 states); the state lifetimes and line intensities of hydrogen; the excited states of helium; the excited states of H2, the
relationships between the masses of fundamental particles; the bond distances, energies, angles, and dipole moments of over 800 molecules; and the parameters of a variety of extended solids. From the molecular theory, Brilliant Light Power has launched a molecular
modeling subsidiary, <a href="http://www.millsian.com/">Millsian Inc</a>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> “ The essence of GUTCP is that every solution is for the true or real source of the observable wherein any solution of an observable as the inherent information for all observables
that can be related to that observable.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b> Here is a a site to down load his book</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b> </b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><a href="http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf">http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf</a></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc. <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>380W. Carmel Valley Rd.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USA<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:Support@NascentInc.com">Wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>