<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Hi André: <o:p>
</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Thanks for wising me up and giving the historical background of SLAC and references. I do need to read up some of these excellent references. Functionally, I have been essentially an experimental
optical engineer, not a particle physicist..<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">However, I do believe that we need to re-build physics from the very foundation up. We are no longer developing new physics based upon un-planned, un-biased accidental observations, Galileo,
Newton, etc. We have been designing all of our new measurement instruments biased by our WORKING THEORIES and previously successful experiments. “Our theories are determining what are observable!” – Einstein.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">We have been succeeding in modeling many tiny segments of the vast complex universe, each time, using a small independent set of self-consistent logics (framed by postulates and math). Even when
some of these models seem to work, there is no guarantee that we have captured ontological cosmic logics. Of course, taking all of physics together, we are certain that we have captured some ontological realities of the universe. However, have we developed
any logical tools to separate theories that are ontologically closer to nature than others?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Please, read also my response to John Duffield, written today.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> André Michaud <srp2@srpinc.org>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, May 26, 2018 1:16 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Roychoudhuri, Chandra <chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu>; srp2@srpinc.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [General] elementary charge question<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Hi Chandra,</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">"<i>My conviction comes from the consistently reproduced old fact that mass-less and charge-less Gamma can interact with heavy nuclei and give rise to “charged” and “massed” electron-positron pair.</i>"</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Same for me.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">I noted however that many considering "quark physics" as you say, think only of the Gell-Man/Zweig theory, and seem not to be aware of the physically carried out non-destructive scattering experiments in the first 2 years
of operation of the SLAC accelerator, with "bullet" electrons for the first time energetic enough to penetrate inside the volumes of protons and neutrons.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">I give no credit to the Gell-Man/Zweig theory other than having predicted the fractional charges that were effectively measured via study of the deflected trajectories of the electrons that penetrated the nucleon volumes,
including many completely backscattered in a highly inelastic manner.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">The detected particles making up the internal scatterable structure of nucleons were found to behave in all respect as slightly more massive elementary particles otherwise identical to electrons and positrons except for
their fractional electric charges.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Their possible rest masses, are estimated from the data collected lie between 1 and 5 MeV/c<sup>2</sup> for the up quark and between 3 to 10 MeV/c<sup>2</sup> for the down quark.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Ref: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,84th edition 2003-3004. CRC Press, New York. 2003. P. 11-6</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">In the trispatial geometry, rest masses for the up and down can be calculated from the Coulomb force to lie within these experimentally determined limits for both particles with respect to distances corresponding to their
fractional charges with respect to the unit charge of the electron.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">When I mention the up and down quark, it is of these SLAC physically detected particles that I am talking about, not of the up and down of the Gell-Man/Zweig theory.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">I think that it is very unfortunate and confusing that the the scattered against inner components of nucleons were named "quarks", which makes them being constantly confused with the theoretical quarks set of the Gell-Man/Zweig
theory.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">All SLAC papers pertaining to the first 2 years of operation pertain to these non-destructive scattering experiments. In fact, the SLAC was built precisely to be able for the first time to provide sufficient energy to
electrons for them to penetrate the confines of nucleons in order to identify their internal structure, which is what they did.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">These papers are in the SLAC archive for whoever is interested in verifying and studying the scattering results.</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Best Regards</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black"> André</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
<a href="http://www.gsjournal.net/">http://www.gsjournal.net/</a><br>
<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684</a><br>
<a href="http://www.srpinc.org/">http://www.srpinc.org/</a> <br>
<br>
On Sat, 26 May 2018 15:30:55 +0000, "Roychoudhuri, Chandra" wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">André:</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">My conviction comes from the consistently reproduced old fact that mass-less and charge-less Gamma can interact with heavy nuclei and give rise to “charged” and “massed” electron-positron pair.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Therefore, both charge and mass are necessarily emergent properties out of the torus-like high speed resonant (self-looped and in-phase) oscillations of the richly endowed space, a Complex Tension Filed (CTF). Conceptually,
“Quark” physics is a wrong direction!</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Resonant “self-looped and in-phase” motion, to me, is the universal foundation behind the emergence of “quantumness” in our micro-world, which is emergent out of the continuum of classical CTF.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Chandra.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;color:black">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;color:black"> André Michaud [<a href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org">mailto:srp2@srpinc.org</a>]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, May 26, 2018 11:18 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Roychoudhuri, Chandra; <a href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org">srp2@srpinc.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] elementary charge question</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Hi Chandra and all,</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">I also agree with Andrew that "charge" would be an "emergent property", possibly a resonance state, because in the trispatial model, "charge" is also definable as an "emergent property" of kinetic energy that allows scaling
the unit charge of the electron, the 2/3 charge of the up quark and the 1/3 charge of the down quark in inverse relation to their rest masses according to the Coulomb law.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">Best Regards</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">André</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
<a href="http://www.gsjournal.net/">http://www.gsjournal.net/</a><br>
<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684</a><br>
<a href="http://www.srpinc.org/">http://www.srpinc.org/</a><br>
<br>
On Sat, 26 May 2018 14:21:09 +0000, "Roychoudhuri, Chandra" wrote:<br>
<br>
Hello Everybody: </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">I like Andre’s cause-effect explanation that the acceleration of electrons follows the same mathematical relation up to extreme high velocities.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">I also like Andrew M’s view that charge is a “resonant state”. Does not that imply - charge is a form of secondary potential gradient generated due to the “resonant motion” of the
space-medium ?</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Chandra.<br>
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Sent from my iPhone</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><br>
</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">On May 26, 2018, at 7:56 AM, Andrew Meulenberg <<a href="mailto:mules333@gmail.com">mules333@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Dear
</span><span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">André</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"> and Chip ,<br>
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Leptons in extreme proximity (sub-fermi levels?) can change their base mass (to below rest mass). I believe that they also change their charge (at the same rate, e.g., in e- e+ annihilation).
The fact that quarks are proposed to have fractional charge indicates that unit charge is not inviolate. Nevertheless, I still think that charge is a resonant state. Proximity makes a difference. Is it because of overlap of fields, extreme fields, or conservation
of energy?<br>
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Andrew M.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"> </span>
<span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 7:43 AM, André Michaud <<a href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org" target="_blank">srp2@srpinc.org</a>> wrote:
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span style="color:black">Hi Chip.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span style="color:black">The very fact that electrons can be accelerated to close to c in a finely controlled manner in high energy accelerators while their trajectories can be just as precisely deflected at these velocities via finely controlling the relative
densities of both ambient <strong>E</strong> field and <strong>B</strong> field is proof that the electron charge is stable at any velocity, because the
<strong>E</strong> field depends on Maxwell's fist equation, which is Gauss's equation for the electric field, whose intensity is controlled by the Coulomb force at play between all charges as a function of the inverse square of the distance separating them.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span style="color:black">It is the fact that the Coulomb force induces energy in electrons precisely as a function of the distance between charges at any velocity according to the precise inverse square law that allows this fine control.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span style="color:black">Ref: Humphries S Jr (1986) <b>Principles of Charged Particle Acceleration</b>, John Wiley & Sons.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span style="color:black">Best Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span lang="EN-CA" style="color:black">André</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">---<br>
André Michaud<br>
GSJournal admin<br>
<a href="http://www.gsjournal.net/" target="_blank">http://www.gsjournal.net/</a><br>
<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684" target="_blank">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684</a><br>
<a href="http://www.srpinc.org/" target="_blank">http://www.srpinc.org/</a> </span>
<span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><br>
</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">On Sat, 26 May 2018 05:44:04 -0500, "Chip Akins" wrote:<br>
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">Hi All<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">I have a question. Does anyone have information about the value of electric charge for a relativistic electron?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">Does the value remain the elementary charge for electrons in accelerators?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">I am looking for experimental data or confirmation of this answer from experiment.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> General
[mailto:<a href="mailto:general-bounces%2Bchipakins" target="_blank">general-bounces+chipakins</a>=<a href="mailto:gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Roychoudhuri, Chandra<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, May 16, 2018 2:04 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black">Richard G.:
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black">Thanks for bringing this to the attention of our group.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black">I have already received this email from Amoroso and I am planning to submit an abstract.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black">Hope to see most of you there.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black">Chandra.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> General
<<a href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b><a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com" target="_blank">richgauthier@gmail.com</a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, May 16, 2018 2:58 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Oreste Caroppo <<a href="mailto:orestecaroppo@yahoo.it" target="_blank">orestecaroppo@yahoo.it</a>>; Louis H Kauffman <<a href="mailto:loukau@gmail.com" target="_blank">loukau@gmail.com</a>>; RL Amoroso <<a href="mailto:noeticj@mindspring.com" target="_blank">noeticj@mindspring.com</a>>;
Nina Sotina <<a href="mailto:nsotina@gmail.com" target="_blank">nsotina@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">Hello all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> I hope many of you will plan to attend the Vigier XI conference in Liege this August 6-9 and present your updated work. Please see the 2nd call for
papers below. It will have been 3 years since SPIE meetings in San Diego, and it would be great for us to get together again in Liege this August. Several of us have already signed up.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> all the best,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> Richard G<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black">Second CALL FOR PAPERS – 11th Vigier Symposium, Liege, Belgium 2018<br>
<br>
Dear Colleague;<br>
<br>
The organizers of the Vigier Conference Series cordially invite you to present a paper at the XIth International Symposium in honor of mathematical physicist Jean-Pierre Vigier titled: “ADVANCES IN FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS: Prelude to Paradigm Shift" to be held
in Liege, Belgium, Monday, 6th August to Thursday, August 9th 2018, (or August 10th as appropriate) on a topic of your choice (preferably related to the theme of the symposium). Details may be found at: <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us/index11.html" target="_blank">http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us/index11.html</a><br>
<br>
If it is impossible for you to attend you may still submit a paper to the proceedings to be published by IOP Conference Proceedings, by paying the proceedings copy fee of US$ 100 or British Pound equivalent (70 BPS).<br>
<br>
We look forward to IOP Proceedings this year as it is open access and thus readership should increase greatly; with addition of a Print Copy to attendees/submitters.<br>
<br>
<br>
Please inform your potentially interested colleagues and print copies of the symposium poster for posting to Dept. bulletin boards.<br>
<br>
Note: Scheduling of a presentation slot on the program requires submitting of registration and appropriate fees.<br>
<br>
Apologies for any redundancies or duplicate email<br>
<br>
Sincerely yours,<br>
<br>
Chairmen<br>
Richard L Amoroso - Noetic Advanced Studies Institute, USA<br>
Daniel M. Dubois - Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium<br>
Louis H Kauffman - University of Illinois at Chicago, USA<br>
Peter Rowlands - University of Liverpool, UK<br>
<br>
<br>
Director - Noetic Advanced Studies Institute<br>
<a href="http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us" target="_blank">www.noeticadvancedstudies.us</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org" target="_blank">srp2@srpinc.org</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" target="_blank">Click here to unsubscribe</a><br>
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><br>
</span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:mules333@gmail.com">mules333@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><br>
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</a><br>
<a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a></span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:srp2@srpinc.org">srp2@srpinc.org</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">Click here to unsubscribe</a><br>
</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>