<html><head><style>body{font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px}</style></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px; ">Hi DataPR</div> <br> <div class="gmail_signature">I append a dozen pages that gives a physical and mathematical description of photons as I understand them. No calculus involved. Most of the mathematics is straight from text books, or slight extensions to them. The wave function equations are just a mathematical format of the physical description shown in the images. Photons of this structure and description are stable and self sustaining. They do not need other properties to describe them.</div><div class="gmail_signature"><br></div><div class="gmail_signature">Hope this helps.</div><div class="gmail_signature"><br></div><div class="gmail_signature">Vivian Robinson</div> <br><p class="airmail_on">On 17 March 2019 at 3:26:52 AM, DataPacRat (<a href="mailto:datapacrat@gmail.com">datapacrat@gmail.com</a>) wrote:</p> <blockquote type="cite" class="clean_bq"><span><div><div></div><div>Hello to the members of this list,<br><br>If you don't mind my asking, would it be possible for any of you to<br>share some short summaries of your approaches and the implications?<br>I'm afraid that I don't have the mathematical chops to truly<br>understand most of what I've been able to skim from the list's<br>archives, but I do write the odd amateur science-fiction story, and I<br>like being able to add physics details most other SF authours don't.<br><br>For example, I might describe one small part of Chip Akins' ideas as<br>"photons are spiralling ribbons of EM fields, kept together by the<br>strong nuclear force; neutrinos are the same thing, only with a<br>different angle of twisting, and electrons the same but circling<br>around and around". (Which is about as much as I've managed to<br>assemble so far from the PDFs he's released.) I could do something of<br>the same with my superficial understanding of quantized inertia (or,<br>for fun, try to combine QI with Akins' ideas), but I've seen mentions<br>of other approaches in the archives that I haven't been able to track<br>down, let alone start reading.<br><br>How much can you explain to someone who's forgotten just about all the<br>techniques of calculus?<br><br><br>Thank you for your time,<br>--<br>DataPacRat<br>"Does aₘᵢₙ=2c²/Θ ? I don't know, but wouldn't it be fascinating if it were?"<br>_______________________________________________<br>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at viv@universephysics.com<br><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/viv%40universephysics.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><br>Click here to unsubscribe<br></a><br></div></div></span></blockquote></body></html>