<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Dan,<div class=""> Thanks for sharing your real name. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> Most if not all of the models of an electron as a cycling photon-like object or other circulating wave-like object on this discussion list are for an electron moving in free space. My internally-superluminal relativistic quantum-vortex electron model and related double-helix photon model are described in the article <h4 class="media-heading" style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.4; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; font-variant-ligatures: normal; orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><font color="#000000" class=""><a href="http://www.academia.edu/attachments/57862769/download_file?s=portfolio" target="_blank" style="font-weight: normal; box-sizing: border-box; outline: 0px;" class="">Quantum-entangled superluminal double-helix photon produces a relativistic superluminal quantum-vortex zitterbewegung electron and positron</a><span style="font-weight: normal;" class=""> at <a href="https://richardgauthier.academia.edu/research" class="">https://richardgauthier.academia.edu/research</a>. I’ll have another article soon with more details for the relativistic electron model. For example, I found that for BOTH the resting quantum-vortex electron model and the very highly relativistic quantum-vortex electron model (as gamma -> infinity), its minimum internal speed is calculated to be c and its maximum internal superluminal speed is calculated to be c </span></font><span style="font-weight: normal;" class="">sqrt(5)= 2.236c, although the maximum and minimum speeds vary in an interesting way between these two electron speeds.</span></h4><div class="">We are open to suggestions, comments and questions.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> all the best,</div><div class=""> Richard</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Mar 20, 2019, at 5:04 PM, DataPacRat <<a href="mailto:datapacrat@gmail.com" class="">datapacrat@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">I'm still reading up on several peoples' approaches to electrons being<br class="">made of cycling photons, but the lack of consistent terms between the<br class="">different authours is making it hard for me to Google for further<br class="">elaborations. For example, has any modelling been done on how<br class="">electrons of this sort behave while superconducting? That is, does<br class="">this model offer any testable predictions beyond that of the<br class="">classical, single-point particle model of an electron?<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">(PS: I've been asked to share my real name on this list. It's Daniel<br class="">Eliot Boese, though I've been using DataPacRat since '01, and it's my<br class="">preferred nom-de-net.)<br class=""><br class="">Thank you for your time,<br class="">--<br class="">Dan Boese, aka DataPacRat<br class="">"Does aₘᵢₙ=2c²/Θ ? I don't know, but wouldn't it be fascinating if it were?"<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com" class="">richgauthier@gmail.com</a><br class=""><a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" class="">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br class="">Click here to unsubscribe<br class=""></a><br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>