<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
h4
{mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 4 Char";
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.Heading4Char
{mso-style-name:"Heading 4 Char";
mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 4";
font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif;
color:#2E74B5;
font-style:italic;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Many thanks, Dan, for re-energizing the group discussions.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> General <general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Richard Gauthier<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, March 21, 2019 4:16 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Can cyclic-photon electrons better describe superconductivity?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Dan,<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Thanks for sharing your real name. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Most if not all of the models of an electron as a cycling photon-like object or other circulating wave-like object on this discussion list are for an electron moving in free space. My internally-superluminal relativistic quantum-vortex
electron model and related double-helix photon model are described in the article <o:p></o:p></p>
<h4 style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:9.0pt;margin-left:0in">
<span style="color:black"><a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.academia.edu%2Fattachments%2F57862769%2Fdownload_file%3Fs%3Dportfolio&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ce63059705f574f4a399308d6add58848%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636887529974077771&sdata=G0HvZm7dqKlCpn9qKOOiRazlMAnx1H7d7m2hYXER8dE%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight:normal">Quantum-entangled
superluminal double-helix photon produces a relativistic superluminal quantum-vortex zitterbewegung electron and positron</span></a></span><span style="color:black;font-weight:normal"> at <a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frichardgauthier.academia.edu%2Fresearch&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ce63059705f574f4a399308d6add58848%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636887529974087780&sdata=Jd3aY3b7P9xU2Rh9CALc06a30ojVB5cby6%2FaKSQdDmQ%3D&reserved=0">https://richardgauthier.academia.edu/research</a>.
I’ll have another article soon with more details for the relativistic electron model. For example, I found that for BOTH the resting quantum-vortex electron model and the very highly relativistic quantum-vortex electron model (as gamma -> infinity), its minimum
internal speed is calculated to be c and its maximum internal superluminal speed is calculated to be c </span><span style="font-weight:normal">sqrt(5)= 2.236c, although the maximum and minimum speeds vary in an interesting way between these two electron speeds.</span><o:p></o:p></h4>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We are open to suggestions, comments and questions.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> all the best,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Richard<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mar 20, 2019, at 5:04 PM, DataPacRat <<a href="mailto:datapacrat@gmail.com">datapacrat@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I'm still reading up on several peoples' approaches to electrons being<br>
made of cycling photons, but the lack of consistent terms between the<br>
different authours is making it hard for me to Google for further<br>
elaborations. For example, has any modelling been done on how<br>
electrons of this sort behave while superconducting? That is, does<br>
this model offer any testable predictions beyond that of the<br>
classical, single-point particle model of an electron?<br>
<br>
<br>
(PS: I've been asked to share my real name on this list. It's Daniel<br>
Eliot Boese, though I've been using DataPacRat since '01, and it's my<br>
preferred nom-de-net.)<br>
<br>
Thank you for your time,<br>
--<br>
Dan Boese, aka DataPacRat<br>
"Does aₘᵢₙ=2c²/Θ ? I don't know, but wouldn't it be fascinating if it were?"<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com">richgauthier@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Frichgauthier%2540gmail.com%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ce63059705f574f4a399308d6add58848%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636887529974097784&sdata=CnKJpTfAcIbxgOnia%2F3W0b%2BA1nkbQSlKmPisbIsMhtE%3D&reserved=0">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>