<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Segoe UI";
panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 4 2 2 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:m_-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Adam and the rest of our colleagues:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Linear differential equations (Maxwell, Schrodinger, etc.) can accept any linear combination of all their individual solutions. That is simply unchallengeable. It is simply correct mathematical
logic. However, when we try to model ONTOLOGICAL PROCESSES in nature, human mathematical logic is NEVER sufficient and final. That is why all theories must be challenged proactively keep advancing the human mental evolution in advancing our “Evidence based
science”. Remember Gödel’s “Incompleteness Theorem”!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">I know I have been failing to convince most of you exactly what I mean by “Non-Interaction of Waves” (NIW).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Please, watch this dynamic PPT-slide, a copy from an Wikipedia article on Superposition Principle.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Two oppositely propagating waves (here of same frequency) keeps propagating unperturbed by each other’s physical propagation-presence. This is NIW. The intrinsic dynamic properties of the two
waves remain unperturbed. For EM waves, we do not see the supporting tension field. Only resonant oscillators can respond to the filed(s). At the antinode locations (“think locality”!), the detecting dipoles will respond strongly. At the node locations, the
dipoles would not oscillate and cannot absorb energy and remains “dark”. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">In optical interferometry, dark fringes are not due to<b><i> non-arrival of photons</i></b>. “No “photons” arrive at the dark-fringe-locations” -- has been the greatest sustained interpretational
mistake the Physics community has been perpetuating for a whole century. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> General <general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Roychoudhuri, Chandra<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, May 12, 2019 6:11 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Single Component Model of Electrons<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Adam: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">I am glad that you now appreciate the obviousness of NIW in nature. That is the reason why our world is working smoothly.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">But, the neglect of NIW has introduced a very serious number of basic mis-conceptions, which we are trying to correct by introducing non-causal postulates like, “delayed-choice”, “uncertainty
principle” as nature’s fundamental behavior, rather than asour ignorance, etc. Fourier summation of monochromatic waves do not take place in nature. First, nature cannot allow the existence of Fourier plane wave as that would violate the conservation of energy.
Second, by virtue of NIW, Fourier summation can happen only through some interacting material medium, not in free space.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">I am attaching my last book, where I have illustrated a series of conceptual mistakes in optical phenomena, which are also carried over into quantum interpretations. Read the last Ch.12 first,
on epistemology; then continue from backward.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> General <<a href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Adam K<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, May 12, 2019 5:56 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Single Component Model of Electrons<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Chandra,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I understand now. I agree with you more or less completely. It is time for the human race to wake up, and striking deeply into the heart of nature is a definite prerequisite. I hope that it will also be sufficient. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">It seems that NIW as you conceive it is a pre-theoretic FACT, which must be accommodated. The usual way of doing this is with the linearity of the wave equation. But I like your approach because it attempts to truly think about the foundations.
The much more common approach, one which I think is not going to work in the long run, is to attempt a deep formulation of nature and physical truths while assuming some part of the current theoretical physical apparatus. There is so much that needs to be
explained, that assuming pretty much anything is a dangerous move. An example of this is John M.’s recent explanation of electromagnetism. Whether or not it is correct, it tries to explain something typically thought of as fundamental. This needs to be done
everywhere. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">My own approach is to start more or less where you do. With some CTF which satisfies the wave equation. I leave it open whether or not the medium is acoustic, elastic, or something else. But I strongly base everything on NIW. I am glad
that I understand your approach better now. I think that it is a sound epistemological position. It reminds me moreover of one of my favorite quotes by Einstein: <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><i><span style="font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#222222;border:none windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">How does it happen that a properly endowed natural scientist comes to concern himself with epistemology? </span></i><i><span style="font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#222222">Is
there not some more valuable work to be done in his specialty? That's what I hear many of my colleagues ask, and I sense it from many more. But I cannot share this sentiment. When I think about the ablest students whom I have encountered in my teaching — that
is, those who distinguish themselves by their independence of judgment and not just their quick-wittedness — I can affirm that they had a vigorous interest in epistemology. They happily began discussions about the goals and methods of science, and they showed
unequivocally, through tenacious defense of their views, that the subject seemed important to them.</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#222222;border:none windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">Concepts that have proven useful in ordering things easily achieve such authority over us that we forget their earthly origins and
accept them as unalterable givens.</span></i><i><span style="font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#222222"> <span style="border:none windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in">Therefore it is by no means an idle game if we become practiced in analysing long-held commonplace
concepts and showing the circumstances on which their justification and usefulness depend, and how they have grown up, individually, out of the givens of experience. Thus their excessive authority will be broken.</span> They will be removed if they cannot
be properly legitimated, corrected if their correlation with given things be far too superfluous, or replaced if a new system can be established that we prefer for whatever reason.</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#222222">Best wishes,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#222222">Adam</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 10:05 AM Roychoudhuri, Chandra <<a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Adam:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">When we focus our earthbound telescope (of appropriate resolution) to any specific near-by planet, or a most-distant galaxy, we register
its image unperturbed by the light due to trillions of other light sources which have spatially cross-propagated through each other through the
<b><i>same cosmic volume</i></b>. That is Non-Interaction of Waves (NIW) in the linear domain in “vacuum”! The Global Internet is constantly working exploiting multi-channel optical data multiplexed through the same single-mode fiber-glass volume. This is also
simple NIW. Nonlinearities of the fiber does produce some weak Raman shifted signals; but we know how to reject them in our de-multiplexing process.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">My original re-discovery was with an “expensive and sophisticated” experiment during 1975, as most modern physicists try to do. I used
a very expensive Fabry-Perot parallel-plate interferometer in a tilted posture. </span>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> Decades later, I found out that, literally one thousand years ago, the Arab physicist, Alhazen, carried out a conceptually much
simpler and yet definitive experiment, using a set of candles and a pin-hole camera (“camera-obscura” in those days!) and he drew the same conclusion. Of course, I may be the first one to recognize that NIW is the inherent property of all tension-field-based
waves, which is built into the wave equation and hence the space must have “ether” as a Complex Tension Field (CTF). I am using the word “complex” to refer to my deeper ignorance about this CTF, as to how it is capable of generating all the observable (i)
<i>waves, (ii) particles and (iii) interaction</i> forces to engender the perpetually recycling universe without endangering the long re-cycling processes to allow the biological evolution and their pleasure of living out the lives. The “islands of temporal
stability” allows the biological entities to appreciate the marvels of the recycling universe and even model them!
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> <i>The foundation of the edifice of physics has not yet been laid out firmly by the currently “working theories</i>”. However,
humans have advanced enough to re-start the re-organizing process for a new set of comprehensive foundation postulates and generate the second round of human adventure to develop a unified field theory of the universe. This second round will take us to a much
higher summit of comprehensive understanding of the universe. However, we will have to keep re-iterating such theorizations using the Interaction Process Mapping Epistemology (IPM-E) several more times, before we can master the universe. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> Why IPM-E? Human invented mathematical logics are not identical to those of the creator. Further, human logics can never be pinned
down to one, and only one, meaning. Subjectivity of the human neural network is both our savior towards our sustainability out of diversity and our creativity, and a serious danger to guide ourselves to a deadly wrong path. Remember the children’s “Pied Piper”
story?! We need to learn to re-train our subjective neural network (evolved for survival) towards an objective neural network to really appreciate the
<i>objective evolution</i> of the universe. We need to anchor our understanding to objective reality by trying to model and measure the interaction processes going on in nature.
<i>Nature is a marvelous creative system engineer</i>. We must retrain ourselves to emulate her.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> Gorgeous mathematical painting, with built-in symmetry, may display superb esthetic beauty; but it cannot guide us to carry out
the geo-physical re-engineering PROCESS along some path that will assure the sustainability of our biosphere. I am more interested in the assurance that our grand, grand-children will be alive to enjoy their lives while still continuing to understand nature
deeper and deeper. I do not feel rushed to acquire the “final knowledge” within my life time. Let it be a multi-century, or a multi-million-year endeavor by the human species!</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Chandra.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> General <general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=<a href="mailto:uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Adam K<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, May 11, 2019 7:26 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Single Component Model of Electrons</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Chandra,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Could you explain in simple terms in a few sentences what NIW is? I have never been able to understand how it differs from the superposition principle (i.e. linearity of the wave
equation). <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">John,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Thanks for the details re Schrodinger. I have skimmed some of your other work, but I am afraid I have not been able to get very far. The main issue is that I don’t have the time
to read and digest 40 pages, much less 400. Your dilatory style prevents me from rapidly assimilating the essence of your thought. For example, in the very beginning you spend several pages talking about how light in a box can have inertia. For me, at least,
it would be better if you did that in two lines, drawing out the mathematical essence. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">I have a lot of respect for what you are doing, I don’t want you to stop or change your process. However, when you get around to promulgating your ideas, I think that for some people
it would be helpful to have things distilled down to their very essence. The words are helpful a lot of the time, but sometimes they get in the way. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Best wishes,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Adam<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:56 PM Richard Gauthier <<a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com" target="_blank">richgauthier@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Hello John M. and all,<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> Elementary particles such a neutron, and even small molecules such as fullerenes (Buckyballs) show double-slit wavelike interference patterns with a de Broglie wavelength Lambda-dB
= h/p , where p is the particle’s or molecule's momentum. Does a resting neutron, consisting of 3 quarks and many gluons, actually have an internal fundamental physical frequency equal to the neutron’s calculated Compton frequency f=Mc^2/h where M is the mass
of the neutron? I don’t think so. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> I think that it is also not necessary for a resting electron model to contain the Compton frequency Fcompton=mc^2/h in order to generate the de Broglie wavelength Lambda-dB=h/p
when moving. My quantum vortex zitterbewegung electron model, like the Dirac electron, has an internal frequency equals to the Dirac zitterbewegung frequency 2mc^2/h which is twice the Compton frequency. Yet the electron model has a resting energy Eo=mc^2
because it is composed of a spin-1/2 half-photon originating from a double-helix photon model (composed of 2 spin-1/2 half-photons) that needed to have photon energy of at least E=2mc^2 and photon frequency Fzitt=2mc^2/h so that each half-photon composing
this photon, during e-p pair production near an atomic nucleus, would have enough energy to form an electron or positron of rest energy mc^2 while internally keeping the original photon’s zitterbewegung frequency 2mc^2/h. It may be that it is a particle's
rest energy Eo=mc^2 (as in a resting neutron or electron), and not a particle’s internal Compton frequency mc^2/h, that creates the de Broglie wavelength of a moving particle.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> Richard<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">On May 10, 2019, at 3:55 PM, John Macken <<a href="mailto:john@macken.com" target="_blank">john@macken.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">Adam,<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">In your last post to me, you asked the following question:</span><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>“What
spherical standing wave models did Schrodinger work on? That is news to me!” <span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span></span><span style="color:#20188C">Schrodinger’s
paper is discussed in my paper titled:<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>Energetic spacetime: The new aether</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>.
My paper is available at:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F280081640_Energetic_Spacetime_the_New_Aether&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ccc78c869378445b0a68208d6d726bf78%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636932959835720280&sdata=57LgDFHguPE2H3TnrN4xN%2F46mP1lmuBeggQiBnnWafs%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280081640_Energetic_Spacetime_the_New_Aether</span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#333399">Starting on page 10 of this paper, I talk about Schrodinger’s wave-based explanation of Compton scattering. I reference and quote from his paper titled:<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>The
Compton effect</b>.<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="color:#20188C">He did not specifically mention<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>spherical</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>standing
waves, but he did propose a model of the standing wave pattern which would be formed by the spherical wave model of an electron I am proposing. In words, the photons in Schrodinger’s explanation of Compton scattering are reflecting off the Bragg reflector
which would be produced in spacetime by my proposed model of an electron. There are more details to this explanation which are in the article.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">I must also mention that it was very difficult for me to obtain a copy of Schrodinger’s original paper. I saw references to it, but I had to buy a book
of all of Schrodinger’s papers in order to get a copy of this paper. I do not now have a copy of this book.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">It should also be noted that in order to get the correct de Broglie wave pattern produced by an electron, the electron must be producing waves with frequency
equal to the electron’s Compton frequency, in a stationary frame of reference. De Broglie himself also postulated this Compton frequency in his famous thesis paper. He used this frequency to predict the wave characteristics which were experimentally observed
several years later. This earned him the Nobel prize. I mention this because several of the electron models being discussed by the group are based on twice the electron’s Compton frequency. This higher frequency does not produce the correct de Broglie waves
for an electron.<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">John M.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">General
<<a href="mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>On
Behalf Of<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Roychoudhuri, Chandra<br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Thursday, May 09, 2019 4:39 PM<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [General] Single Component Model of Electrons</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Adam:<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">I am working from the bottom up, leveraging my re-discovery of Non-Interaction of Waves (NIW), which was experimentally demonstrated
by Alhazen about 100 years ago and formally postulated by Huygens around 1676.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">NIW is built into wave equation where waves are propelled by the built-in tension property. Classical Superposition Principle (SP) and
NIW are built into Maxwell’s wave equation.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> Quantum Superposition Principle if built into Schrodinger’s “wave” equation. However, this equation does not propel particles unless
we plug in a potential gradient “V”!??</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> Optical SP can be displayed only after a detector interacts with the superposed multiple waves and absorbs energy. NIW remains effective
– no results without a detector! That is the context where I defined the need for incorporating Interaction Process mapping Epistemology (IPM-E).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> However, for quantum SP, we have been ignoring this IPM-E and spending many brilliant physicist-hours trying to build quantum computers
using quantum SP!?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Just some food for thought.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Chandra.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">General
<<a href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a>><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>On
Behalf Of<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Adam K<br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Thursday, May 09, 2019 2:33 PM<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [General] Single Component Model of Electrons</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Chandra: <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Yes, something like this is certainly true. The nature of the self-looping and the interactions of the structures and the gradients is mostly what I think about. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Adam<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:21 AM Roychoudhuri, Chandra <<a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</span></a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Adam:<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">I have conceptualized in my earlier papers, from the stand point of grand unification, that all the “forces” are fundamentally different
kinds of potential gradients of the same CTF, generated (caused) by different kinds of localized self-looped oscillations, the exact structures of which should be determined by our mathematically talented colleagues.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Chandra.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">General
<general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=<a href="mailto:uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a>><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>On
Behalf Of<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Adam K<br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Thursday, May 09, 2019 1:55 PM<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [General] Single Component Model of Electrons</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">John, Chandra,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">There is no doubt in my mind that what Chandra outlines is the right way to go for physics. There is of course a wave medium through which light and gravitational waves propagate.
What exactly it is, is an open question. I prefer Chandra’s CTF to the zero-point energy field, because this is based on quantum concepts, and I feel that we should derive these concepts, not rely on them as foundational. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">I will find time to look more in depth at your book, John. I believe that you are on the right track with your notions of electrostatic force and gravity. I had the same ideas myself,
as have several others. The main problems (how to specify exactly how this works from simple first principles) remains unsolved I think. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">What spherical standing wave models did Schrodinger work on? That is news to me! <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Best wishes,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Adam<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:10 AM Roychoudhuri, Chandra <<a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</span></a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">“My work starts with a quantifiable model of zero-point energy (ZPE) in the quantum vacuum. This is modeled as a sea of Planck length and Planck time
vacuum fluctuations, predominantly at Planck frequency. This is not arm waving – it has quantifiable impedance, flux energy density and elasticity. I then prove that both gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation encounter this same impedance. This
has the property of a universal field. Now<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b><i>I have a concrete starting point to build everything in the universe</i></b>.”<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#1F497D">John M:<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#1F497D">This is great progress.</span><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><span style="color:#1F497D">Keep
up the good work!</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#1F497D">What the current literature is calling “zero-point energy”, I call it “Complex<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>Tension</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Field”
or CTF. This is to trigger a fresh conceptual start.<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b><i>To me, CTF holds 100% of the energy of the universe</i></b>. EM waves
cannot travel across the entire cosmic space with the same fixed velocity without the presence of stationary tension field. To accommodate absence of “ether drag”, particles have to be localized self-looped oscillators of the same tension field. EM waves and
particles, comprising the observable universe, are just different kinds of excited states of this same CTF. Particles and EM waves can interact with each other and can get converted to each other. These excited state energy cannot be assimilated back by the
CTF, hence the law of conservation of energy reigns supreme in our CAUSAL universe. Dark Energy and Dark Matter are dark alleys to me.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#1F497D"> Generating models for localized self-looped harmonic oscillators as elementary particles is the right direction for Physics, as you gentlemen are
doing. Schrodinger’s Exp[iEt/ћ] with E=hf, f being the<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b><i>self-looped oscillation frequency of particles</i></b>, makes Schrodinger
equation so powerful. Interpreting Exp[iEt/ћ] as a plane wave has been a grave mistake of Physics. The universe cannot sustain a plane-waves; it is energetically divergent.<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#1F497D">Keep up the good work,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#1F497D">Chandra.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b>From:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>General <general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=<a href="mailto:uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a>><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>On
Behalf Of<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></b>John Macken<br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Thursday, May 09, 2019 2:59 AM<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [General] Single Component Model of Electrons<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">Hi Adam,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">Thank you for your comments. You have reminded me that I should look into previous work a little deeper. I did come across Milo Wolf’s work years ago.
However, as I recall I concluded that de Broglie himself had pointed out that the counter propagating waves could create some of the characteristics of a particle’s de Broglie waves. Therefore, I did not see Milo Wolf adding too much. In fact, both Milo and</span><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Gabriel
LaFreniere<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span></span><span style="color:#20188C">have monopole wave diagrams. These are the easiest to draw
as a starting point, but they are wrong when you actually look at their particle characteristics more closely. The most obvious problem is that they do not have ½ h bar angular momentum and related properties. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">Schrodinger also attempted to generate a similar wave-based particle model. He eventually abandoned the idea because he was visualizing waves in classical
space which is an empty void. Schrodinger could not offer any mechanism of how these waves could be stabilized.<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">My work starts with a quantifiable model of zero-point energy (ZPE) in the quantum vacuum. This is modeled as a sea of Planck length and Planck time
vacuum fluctuations, predominantly at Planck frequency. This is not arm waving – it has quantifiable impedance, flux energy density and elasticity. I then prove that both gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation encounter this same impedance. This
has the property of a universal field. Now I have a concrete starting point to build everything in the universe.<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">I will skip many intermediate steps and mention that this model of the quantum vacuum and particles generate both electric fields and gravity. I then
find that this wave-based model reveals relationships between the gravitational force and the electrostatic force which were previously unrecognized. I give several predictions which are easily proven correct. I have other predictions, not mentioned in the
article, which require experiments. If you are interested, I can talk about predictions (not in the article) in a future post.<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C">John M.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:#20188C"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b>From:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>General <<a href="mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a>><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>On
Behalf Of<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Adam K<br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Wednesday, May 08, 2019 11:24 AM<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [General] Single Component Model of Electrons<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Hi John,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">I was surprised to see your diagrams. I thought I was the only one pursuing models of this kind. Well done for striking so closely at the door of truth! <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Your paper would probably benefit from mention of the work of Milo Wolf, Gabriel LaFreniere, Geoff Haselhurst, and others who have pursued the spherical standing wave model of the
electron. Their diagrams are basically identical to yours (except for the spirals). <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">One problem that all of these authors have had is how to get the inward-propagating waves. You mention Bragg reflection of vortex waves entering resonance with the spacetime field.
Do you have the details worked out mathematically? <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Also, many thanks for the appendix, which looks very useful. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Best wishes,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Adam<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:17 AM John Macken <<a href="mailto:john@macken.com" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">john@macken.com</span></a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Hello All,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> I have been following the discussion, but I have not contributed for a long time. I have been working on a model of the universe based on the idea that the quantum vacuum
is Planck length and Planck time vacuum fluctuations. This is a quantifiable starting assumption for a universal field which generates everything in the universe, including electrons. The attached paper draft titled<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><b>Single
component model of the universe</b>, starts off by describing this basic building block. However, the second half of this paper tests this hypothesis by seeing if it can generate a model of an electron from the properties of the quantum vacuum.<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> This model addresses electron properties generally not addressed in this group. For example, an electron’s de Broglie wave characteristics give key insights into the required
physical properties of an electron model. Since this research generates equations for the properties of the quantum vacuum, it is possible use these equations to test whether the model generates the electron’s energy, inertia, electric field and gravitational
field. This model generates numerous falsifiable predictions. Some of these predictions can be easily tested. Other predictions require further analysis or experiments.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> Besides the attached paper, there is a second attached PDF titled “Chapter 1 Appendix”. This is reference [19] in the paper. This reference is 2 pages out of a 400 page book.
Therefore, it is easier to just attach this for this group. It contains several key calculations which form the basis of the electron model.<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">John Macken<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="mailto:afokay@gmail.com" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">afokay@gmail.com</span></a><br>
<a href="<a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fafokay%2540gmail.com%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ccc78c869378445b0a68208d6d726bf78%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636932959835730289&sdata=0zQTKHtb0cdHFvAyLFU4IWHopf9WS0eJTGbN1XO%2F2bk%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/afokay%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="mailto:afokay@gmail.com" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">afokay@gmail.com</span></a><br>
<a href="<a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fafokay%2540gmail.com%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ccc78c869378445b0a68208d6d726bf78%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636932959835730289&sdata=0zQTKHtb0cdHFvAyLFU4IWHopf9WS0eJTGbN1XO%2F2bk%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/afokay%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at<span class="m-4805207654764129647m-5820169366788761120m-5822528997352016531m-3399279061547599761apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="mailto:afokay@gmail.com" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">afokay@gmail.com</span></a><br>
<a href="<a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fafokay%2540gmail.com%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ccc78c869378445b0a68208d6d726bf78%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636932959835740297&sdata=Ov7fI38q5AusR6OEd5zZeXfqSwJUJoy%2BuN%2Bk5LCFO2E%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/afokay%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com" target="_blank">richgauthier@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Frichgauthier%2540gmail.com%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ccc78c869378445b0a68208d6d726bf78%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636932959835750306&sdata=iYDYs2cHx7OHwGvu6pOi99cuTK%2BEHAj2DB0Wta%2B%2FJbo%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:afokay@gmail.com" target="_blank">afokay@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fafokay%2540gmail.com%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ccc78c869378445b0a68208d6d726bf78%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636932959835750306&sdata=2r0vxRFBGaJkrtivgvF1lmqI8U422lz0Gx%2Fuj%2F6AxXE%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/afokay%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:afokay@gmail.com" target="_blank">afokay@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fafokay%2540gmail.com%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Ccc78c869378445b0a68208d6d726bf78%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C636932959835760314&sdata=MYY5TzILO7KPD%2BW9jR%2BXTLerwrHHZo6oEXs5uupIxdE%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/afokay%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>