<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:NimbusRomNo9L;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
p.airmailon, li.airmailon, div.airmailon
{mso-style-name:airmail_on;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Hello everybody!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">I hope all of you are safe and well.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Please, take all possible precautions to stay away from COVID-19. It is a ruthless virus, especially, if the body is compromised due to some other ailments.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Fortunately, the real death rate is a tiny tiny fraction of one percent when you consider the global population to be over 7 Billion. Even the recovery rate is hovering around 96%, or better, for those who
have been hospitalized with COVID-19.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">So relax, rest, exercise (especially, breathing exercises) and enjoy good food. Intellectual exercise is also an important component of maintaining good health.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Thank you Viv, Oliver and everybody else for keeping up the discussions on the fact that the foundational physics-thinking has to be re-visited and re-structured from the very beginning.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">
<p class="MsoNormal">Sent from my iPhone<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">On Mar 11, 2020, at 12:44 AM, Viv Robinson <viv@universephysics.com> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"></span> <o:p>
</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt;background:#FFEB9C"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">*Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif">Dear Oliver,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you for your report. I share your sentiments and express my displeasure in the following way. "<i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif">QED seems very good in obtaining an expression for the anomalous magnetic
moment of an electron, that differs from the actual by about 1%, yet in another field it requires the universe to have an energy density of ≈ 10^120 higher than is measured</span></i>". I guess that is one of "<b><span style="font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif">The
problem of infinities</span></b><span style="font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif">”. I am of the opinion that it is better to have a theory that explains the 10^-10 J/m^3 density of the universe and differs by about 1% for the observed value of the electron’s
magnetic moment, than to have something that differs by 10^120 but accurately explains an error of ≈ 1%</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif">Cheers,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif">Vivian Robinson</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif"> </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="airmailon">On 11 March 2020 at 7:12:36 AM, oliver consa (<a href="mailto:oliver.consa@gmail.com">oliver.consa@gmail.com</a>) wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear fellow scientist,<br>
<br>
I send you this mail because you have been skeptical about Foundations of Physics. I think that this new paper will be of your interest. Feel free to share it with your colleagues or publish it on the web. I consider it important that this paper serves to open
a public debate on this subject.<br>
<br>
<br>
<b>Something is Rotten in the State of QED</b><br>
<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvixra.org%2Fpdf%2F2002.0011v1.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Cdb01eb5ef52b4a1b4d3c08d7c576e8d1%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C1%7C637194986815736302&sdata=xPq35pGnn6OvvNIfzev7F6sQCh5imxPkhxdcimEs1JM%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">https://vixra.org/pdf/2002.0011v1.pdf</a><br>
<br>
Abstract<br>
<i>"Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in the history of science. However, this precision is based on a single experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An examination of QED history reveals
that this value was obtained using illegitimate mathematical traps, manipulations and tricks. These traps included the fraud of Kroll & Karplus, who acknowledged that they lied in their presentation of the most relevant calculation in QED history. As we will
demonstrate in this paper, the Kroll & Karplus scandal was not a unique event. Instead, the scandal represented the fraudulent manner in which physics has been conducted from the creation of QED through today." (12 pag.)</i><br>
<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
Oliver Consa<br>
<a href="mailto:oliver.consa@gmail.com" target="_blank">oliver.consa@gmail.com</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________ <br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at viv@universephysics.com
<br>
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/viv%40universephysics.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
<br>
Click here to unsubscribe <br>
</a> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu<br>
<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fchandra.roychoudhuri%2540uconn.edu%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Cdb01eb5ef52b4a1b4d3c08d7c576e8d1%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637194986815756290&sdata=06dpAu0Zoukum194UXH7fpnBQW6eujWF0TtEx0LhyRM%3D&reserved=0"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>