<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+1">Chandra:</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">I'm sitting in California rain and loving the
quarantine</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">You have probably by now all heard of my
"Conscious Action Book" published by Routledge press that I
selfishly believe is the most advanced text on the 'Physics of
Consciousness', a topic I consider the grandest challenge to
science in general and physics in particular. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">By studying the physics that would be required to
include a physical basis of consciousness I have found it
necessary to return to the last time in history when physics was
understandable and in conformity with personal experience and
intuition. Oliver Consa's comments are in my opinion exactly
what I found - almost a century of work around development
guided by engineering necessities and lacking a coherent picture
of any reality one can imagine. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">My position and Conscious Action Theory in the
history of western thought is described below</font><br>
</p>
<p><img src="cid:part1.1BD78C9D.7134BA3F@NascentInc.com" alt=""
class="" width="532" height="401"></p>
<p><br>
<font size="+1">My approach is to incorporate the 1st-person
perspective as first priority. If I cannot find myself, my
existence, my own conscious living being in a theory then that
theory for me is simply an engineering tool but such theories
have no right or legitimacy in claiming to answer the larger
questions and claims to be finding God particles, origin of
life, who and what we really are, etc,etc.. Answers to these
should not be claimed by such theories.<br>
In order to make progress I have specialized in establishing the
foundations of physics back to the time of Plank> The physics
then was understandable and most important in conformity with
experience and intuition. From that start point my physics is
based upon Goldstien's "Classical Mechanics" and Jackson's
electrodynamics texts , which are still used today. <br>
The fundamental basis of these books is to assume the existence
and properties of mass, charge, space, time. These I understand
intuitively. I see space around me, feel time flow through me,
feel the weight of mass in the pull on my arm, and the effect of
charge when I rub a rubber rod in cats fur. These four items
foundationally anchor my physics in my experience and it is from
this base that the beliefs of a conscious being, "I" who wishes
to know the world must be based. <br>
The development of quantum theory and Einsteins relativity are
both incomplete because they try to develop theories without
taking the human creator of the theories into account and
therefore represent complicated work arounds precisely because
they refuse to accept their own role in creating the reality
they hope to discover.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">I also follow Whitehead =>de Broglie =>
Bohm(see diagram above) and go a step farther. The wave function
in my theory described thought in physical terms as motion of
material in which thought appears.<br>
Think of a computer unplugged - its a system in equilibrium that
just sits there - you plug it in - electric disturbances
propagate through the formerly static equilibrium state -
modifying and changing the content of its memory. These
disturbances are engineered by classic EM laws, but more
fundamentally the movement in the memory can fundamentally be
reduced to linear disturbances which appear in any field of
equilibrium material. And these disturbances are characterized
by Schroedinger's equation, SEE Appendix A5-1 in my book or
Chapter 10 in Goldstien<br>
<br>
There you have quantum theory in a nut shell. <br>
Any stable system in equilibrium will host Schroedinger waves as
long as the disturbances are small enough so as not to destroy
the memory structure (Space) in which the disturbances
propagate. .Furthermore when those disturbances form self
regenerating disturbance loops we have the physical basis of
conscious experiences. </font><br>
<br>
appendix A5-2 defines the wave function as <br>
<img src="cid:part2.C640F751.776743C9@NascentInc.com" alt=""
class=""></p>
<p><font size="+1"><br>
The integral is a happening carried out by Nature, when carried
out by quantum physicists it hides the activity in the form</font>
<span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New
Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:
EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">e</span><sup><span
style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New
Roman";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New
Roman";
mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">2</span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New
Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;
mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">∙π∙ i</span></sup><span
style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New
Roman";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">
<font size="+1">when added and multiplexed this form gives the
Fourier transforms of quantum Theory. We should replace
fundamental particles with fundamental events to straighten
out physics and put it back on its proper course of
development. </font></span><font size="+1"><br>
</font><br>
<font size="+1">When Applied to Relativity: There is obviously a
background space. Every piece of material is actually a self
contains existence activity and there is something it feels like
to be that material. Einstein failed to understand that his own
thought experiments were always carried out in his imagination
which provides the ether or plenum as Bohm called it.</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">When applied to externalized physical experiments
what theory explains the construction, dismantling, and data
analysis of a cyclotron, for example? What theory describes our
body behavior while doing our experiment? This was my PhD thesis
question in 1975. It was rejected then as not being physics. <br>
I had a long talk with Charles Townes *who was on my committee)
and his wife before he died - his answer was Christianity and
God determines our behavior- they were both quite happy with
this answer. I was not, but kept quiet out of politeness. </font></p>
<p><font size="+1">Times have changed - the Physics of Consciousness
has now become a legitimate topic of scientific inquiry. </font></p>
<p><font size="+1">And when applied to YOU: We are events and
should think of ourselves as interacting lifetimes. Linear
disturbances in those lifetime equilibrium structures are your
thoughts. These propagate in the material of your Brain as long
as they are not so large that they destroy the apparatus in
which they propagate. <br>
When they do get large they involve learning, growth and
destruction, death, CAT chapter 8 addresses these phenomena and
chapter 5 shows how Quantum theory is derived from CAT when the
displacements remain in the linear realm. <br>
</font> </p>
<p><font size="+1">Glad the group is still alive and still thinking<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">Wolf</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">PS: the "Brain" referred to above is the real
mechanism "You", which generates the 1st-person experience not
the observable brain which you see in others and feel in the
experience behind your nose that is part of the experience
generated i.e. the screen content not the computer. <br>
</font></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/1/2020 8:33 AM, Roychoudhuri,
Chandra wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL0PR05MB4899BAD4A2AF847B56986C0493C90@BL0PR05MB4899.namprd05.prod.outlook.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:NimbusRomNo9L;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
p.airmailon, li.airmailon, div.airmailon
{mso-style-name:airmail_on;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Hello
everybody!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">I hope all
of you are safe and well.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Please, take
all possible precautions to stay away from COVID-19. It is a
ruthless virus, especially, if the body is compromised due
to some other ailments.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Fortunately,
the real death rate is a tiny tiny fraction of one percent
when you consider the global population to be over 7
Billion. Even the recovery rate is hovering around 96%, or
better, for those who have been hospitalized with COVID-19.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">So relax,
rest, exercise (especially, breathing exercises) and enjoy
good food. Intellectual exercise is also an important
component of maintaining good health.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Thank you
Viv, Oliver and everybody else for keeping up the
discussions on the fact that the foundational
physics-thinking has to be re-visited and re-structured from
the very beginning.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">
<p class="MsoNormal">Sent from my iPhone<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">On Mar
11, 2020, at 12:44 AM, Viv Robinson
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:viv@universephysics.com"><viv@universephysics.com></a> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"></span>
<o:p>
</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="line-height:12.0pt;background:#FFEB9C"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">*Message
sent from a system outside of UConn.*<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif">Dear
Oliver,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you for your report. I
share your sentiments and express my displeasure
in the following way. "<i><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif">QED
seems very good in obtaining an expression for
the anomalous magnetic moment of an electron,
that differs from the actual by about 1%, yet
in another field it requires the universe to
have an energy density of ≈ 10^120 higher than
is measured</span></i>". I guess that is one
of "<b><span
style="font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif">The
problem of infinities</span></b><span
style="font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif">”.
I am of the opinion that it is better to have a
theory that explains the 10^-10 J/m^3 density of
the universe and differs by about 1% for the
observed value of the electron’s magnetic
moment, than to have something that differs by
10^120 but accurately explains an error of ≈ 1%</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif">Cheers,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif">Vivian
Robinson</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"NimbusRomNo9L",serif"> </span><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="airmailon">On 11 March 2020 at 7:12:36 AM,
oliver consa (<a
href="mailto:oliver.consa@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">oliver.consa@gmail.com</a>)
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear fellow scientist,<br>
<br>
I send you this mail because you have been
skeptical about Foundations of Physics. I
think that this new paper will be of your
interest. Feel free to share it with your
colleagues or publish it on the web. I
consider it important that this paper serves
to open a public debate on this subject.<br>
<br>
<br>
<b>Something is Rotten in the State of QED</b><br>
<a
href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvixra.org%2Fpdf%2F2002.0011v1.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Cdb01eb5ef52b4a1b4d3c08d7c576e8d1%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C1%7C637194986815736302&sdata=xPq35pGnn6OvvNIfzev7F6sQCh5imxPkhxdcimEs1JM%3D&reserved=0"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://vixra.org/pdf/2002.0011v1.pdf</a><br>
<br>
Abstract<br>
<i>"Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is
considered the most accurate theory in the
history of science. However, this
precision is based on a single
experimental value: the anomalous magnetic
moment of the electron (g-factor). An
examination of QED history reveals that
this value was obtained using illegitimate
mathematical traps, manipulations and
tricks. These traps included the fraud of
Kroll & Karplus, who acknowledged that
they lied in their presentation of the
most relevant calculation in QED history.
As we will demonstrate in this paper, the
Kroll & Karplus scandal was not a
unique event. Instead, the scandal
represented the fraudulent manner in which
physics has been conducted from the
creation of QED through today." (12 pag.)</i><br>
<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
Oliver Consa<br>
<a href="mailto:oliver.consa@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">oliver.consa@gmail.com</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________
<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication
from the Nature of Light and Particles General
Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:viv@universephysics.com">viv@universephysics.com</a>
<br>
<a
href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/viv%40universephysics.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/viv%40universephysics.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><br>
Click here to unsubscribe <br>
</a> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from
the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion
List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</a><br>
<a
href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fchandra.roychoudhuri%2540uconn.edu%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Cdb01eb5ef52b4a1b4d3c08d7c576e8d1%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637194986815756290&sdata=06dpAu0Zoukum194UXH7fpnBQW6eujWF0TtEx0LhyRM%3D&reserved=0">"https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fchandra.roychoudhuri%2540uconn.edu%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Cchandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu%7Cdb01eb5ef52b4a1b4d3c08d7c576e8d1%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637194986815756290&sdata=06dpAu0Zoukum194UXH7fpnBQW6eujWF0TtEx0LhyRM%3D&reserved=0"</a>><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Nascent Systems Inc.
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@NascentInc.com">Wolf@NascentInc.com</a>
Tel 831-659-3120
Fax 831-659-0432</pre>
</body>
</html>