<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Dear Oliver:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Many thanks, for your article giving the historical origin of the creeping-in deceptive culture within mathematical physics, QED being an example.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">I have attached one of my recent publication. In this paper, have preserved my causal brain and honest opinions. Yes, sometimes I have “gone out on a limb”; but still I have maintained causality!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">If you have any comments, feel free to respond.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1F497D">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> General <general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>oliver consa<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, April 28, 2021 3:40 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> oliver consa <oliver.consa@gmail.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [General] muon g-2 experiment results<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt;background:#FFEB9C"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">*Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">Dear colleagues:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify"><a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bnl.gov%2Fnewsroom%2Fnews.php%3Fa%3D118760&data=04%7C01%7C%7C62b7929515fb421df1ea08d90ab7e234%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637552607179281211%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=tOnb%2FqMycA%2B7%2B2jVXjK9s3reYiVO2PBE8euvYY35dKY%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">First
Results from Fermilab's Muon g-2 Experiment show strong evidence that our best theoretical model of the subatomic world is incomplete.</span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">This evident discrepancy of the experimental data with respect to the theoretical data should make us doubt about the validity
of Quantum electrodynamics (QED). However, it seems that no one is willing to question the validity of the QED and the scientific community prefers to propose new hypotheses to solve the discrepancy (new elementary particles, new fundamental forces, etc ...).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">A year ago, we already anticipated this situation and published this paper:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify"><a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvixra.org%2Fabs%2F2002.0011&data=04%7C01%7C%7C62b7929515fb421df1ea08d90ab7e234%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637552607179281211%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=rZAY32vp95I9HbWCLtgnvrQFvAcfwzp7cqHyurmCNww%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Something
is Rotten in the State of QED</span></b></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">"Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in the history of science. However, this precision
is based on a single experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An examination of QED history reveals that this value was obtained using illegitimate mathematical traps, manipulations and tricks. These traps included the
fraud of Kroll & Karplus, who acknowledged that they lied in their presentation of the most relevant calculation in QED history. As we will demonstrate in this paper, the Kroll & Karplus scandal was not a unique event. Instead, the scandal represented the
fraudulent manner in which physics has been conducted from the creation of QED through today." (12 pag)</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">The paper is fun to read and is already in the
</span><a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vixrapedia.org%2Fwiki%2FVixra_Top_500&data=04%7C01%7C%7C62b7929515fb421df1ea08d90ab7e234%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637552607179291206%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=pdi7UsGEmYQu1ft6auCM9BTSwIzbJjizD0Ce%2FrTKBHY%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Vixra
Top 500</span></a><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">. But if you think that vixra is an unreliable source and the tone of the paper is too rude for your taste, you can also read a more objective and polite version published
in ARXIV: <b>"</b></span><a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2010.10345&data=04%7C01%7C%7C62b7929515fb421df1ea08d90ab7e234%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637552607179291206%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=XGBzf5sz5hvZXXByENYC347ZopQ7OgkF4%2FxgnwqV14k%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">The
Unpublished Feynman Diagram IIc</span></b></a><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black">"</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Best Regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Oliver Consa</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>