<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:"Consolas",serif;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Thank you very much, Consa, for your great papers, along with historical backgrounds, and the follow-on discussions by Burinskii, Duda, etc.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Keep up the good work!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">(Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> General <general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jarek Duda<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, October 16, 2021 2:26 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org; models-of-particles@googlegroups.com<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] HA: Arxiv paper: Something is wrong in the state of QED<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt;background:#FFEB9C"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">*Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p>Dear Oliver,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Thank you for the interesting article, great motivation - I didn't know about it.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I see you emphasize <span style="font-size:12.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">
Gouanère"A Search for the de Broglie Particle Internal Clock by Means of Electron Channeling" electron clock confirmation paper - I also believe is extremely important.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Regarding your electron model as toroidal, the g-factor agreement is indeed spectacular - I will think about it. I am just working on electron ansatz and it seems to require some spin precession/nutation.<br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">The main initial remarks:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">- shouldn't such solenoid have mass density per length? Electron has very concrete 511keV mass, couldn't yours have various? (I rather reserve such shape e.g. for 3 neutrinos),</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">- the most basic interaction for electron is Coulomb - how would you like to get it? Why charge is quantized - e.g. no half-electron?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">- there is very strong experimental confidence that electron is nearly point-like (some gathered:
<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphysics.stackexchange.com%2Fquestions%2F397022%2Fexperimental-boundaries-for-size-of-electron&data=04%7C01%7C%7C43d6077183504718bf5908d990d25a27%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637700055412694418%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=%2BdBzI%2BoTka7xONqANaRq7jdwQDpEa8q3BMFIWfP9EOM%3D&reserved=0">
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/397022/experimental-boundaries-for-size-of-electron</a> ) - yours is much more complex, what might be crucial objection.<br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Best wishes,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Jarek</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">W dniu 16.10.2021 o 19:40, oliver consa pisze:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Alexander, <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you very much for your interest in this paper. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In my paper "Helical Solenoid Model of the Electron" (<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ptep-online.com%2F2018%2FPP-53-06.PDF&data=04%7C01%7C%7C43d6077183504718bf5908d990d25a27%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637700055412704413%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Y1sCchbpDszLkBcRHpank8Od7CKptlezXLbhkT8ehtQ%3D&reserved=0">http://www.ptep-online.com/2018/PP-53-06.PDF</a>),
I proposed an electron model in which the g-factor appeared as a direct consequence from its geometry. As a result I got a g-factor value of g = sqrt (1+ alpha / pi) = 1.0011607. This result is consistent with the Schwinger factor, and it offers a value much
closer to the experimental value.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
One criticism I received, is that it was invalid because the QED predicted a much more accurate result. From there I tried to understand how the calculation was carried out in the QED to transfer the ideas to my model. But to my surprise I found out that all
the QED calculations are bullshit. I kept investigating and everything I found continued to confirm my suspicions. In the end I was encouraged to publish this article. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">My conclusion is that the quantization of the electromagnetic field is an incorrect hypothesis that only leads to infinite results.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best wishes, <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Oliver Consa<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">El vie, 15 oct 2021 a las 9:55, Burinskii A.Ya. (<<a href="mailto:bur@ibrae.ac.ru">bur@ibrae.ac.ru</a>>) escribió:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Oliver,<br>
<br>
Thank you very much for new version of your article.<br>
It is very interesting, and I expect to cite it in my further publication.<br>
I am working now for a stringy version of the Dirac electron as a Kerr-Newman black hole.<br>
What is your opinion about the point that anomalous magnetic momentum<br>
is result of interaction of the electron with external em field, and thus,<br>
it is not proper electron's magnetic momentum.<br>
<br>
Best regards, Alexander<br>
<br>
________________________________<br>
От: oliver consa [<a href="mailto:oliver.consa@gmail.com" target="_blank">oliver.consa@gmail.com</a>]<br>
Отправлено: 10 октября 2021 г. 13:06<br>
Кому: oliver consa<br>
Тема: [General] Arxiv paper: Something is wrong in the state of QED<br>
<br>
<br>
Dear colleague,<br>
<br>
<br>
I am sending you this paper because I am convinced will be of interest to you:<br>
<br>
<br>
Something is wrong in the state of QED<br>
<br>
<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2110.02078&data=04%7C01%7C%7C43d6077183504718bf5908d990d25a27%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637700055412714407%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=fItRU7WxXqRJ%2FPBs%2FAd7f2Nefwn7g1Gd48f9n0xyjf4%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02078</a><br>
<br>
<br>
“Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in the history of science. However, this precision is based on a single experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An examination of the history of QED
reveals that this value was obtained in a very suspicious way. These suspicions include the case of Karplus & Kroll, who admitted to having lied in their presentation of the most relevant calculation in the history of QED. As we will demonstrate in this paper,
the Karplus & Kroll affair was not an isolated case, but one in a long series of errors, suspicious coincidences, mathematical inconsistencies and renormalized infinities swept under the rug.”<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
This paper raises important questions about the validity and legitimacy of the QED. I believe that it is a topic that deserves a greater diffusion and a public debate.<br>
<br>
<br>
It is an improved and corrected version of a popular previous paper published by me on Vixra. The information has been expanded and corrected, much more respectful language has been used, and most subjective interpretations of the facts have been eliminated.<br>
<br>
<br>
I hope you enjoy it<br>
<br>
<br>
Best Wishes,<br>
<br>
Oliver Consa<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:oliver.consa@gmail.com" target="_blank">oliver.consa@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foliver.consa%2540gmail.com%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=04%7C01%7C%7C43d6077183504718bf5908d990d25a27%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637700055412714407%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=k6fMTvUsakSHxqV80H8XtVLgd8wfWoUw1bESHIj9nb4%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/oliver.consa%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:dudajar@gmail.com">dudajar@gmail.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.natureoflightandparticles.org%2Foptions.cgi%2Fgeneral-natureoflightandparticles.org%2Fdudajar%2540gmail.com%3Funsub%3D1%26unsubconfirm%3D1&data=04%7C01%7C%7C43d6077183504718bf5908d990d25a27%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637700055412724398%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=4Nx7BRrGwgC0ktc4XfQT8roe3q%2BR8C1XwwUzmMQAWiw%3D&reserved=0">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/dudajar%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>dr Jarosław Duda<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Institute of Computer Science and Computer Mathematics,<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fth.if.uj.edu.pl%2F~dudaj%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7C43d6077183504718bf5908d990d25a27%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637700055412724398%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=19ldHiE7hosaOX4yflEmogZn%2Ff%2BwNCJe0p2KNvpx4XA%3D&reserved=0">http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>