[General] Photon Spin

Sun Apr 26 08:31:36 PDT 2015

Chip
So, from the graphs of the photon there is an ultra high frequency rotating wave that is time-averaged charge which nets to zero due to the rotation of the electric vector, E. 
How does B play a role in neutralizing or time-averaging the charge?
This modeling is a 3D vector model it would appear with zero modulation, no conditioning and 1 unit E vector. The photon travels at light-like velocities in situ per medium.
 Is there a scalar field or should one be considered at some value or minimum?
Does the photon leave a wake?
Is this a universal model which may include meta responses, QCD/QED vacuum, or negative vacuum conditions
Can the B field (H according to some) vary?
Can the Poynting vector be quantized?
Would you be so kind to provide  detailed  zoomed sections  at the axis and at the edge?
Is there a sub elementary particle that is causing the E and B field?

Best
David

      From: Chip Akins <chipakins at gmail.com>
 To: 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> 
 Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 6:00 AM
 Subject: Re: [General] Photon Spin

#yiv2285517206 #yiv2285517206 -- _filtered #yiv2285517206 {font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} _filtered #yiv2285517206 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv2285517206 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv2285517206 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv2285517206 #yiv2285517206 p.yiv2285517206MsoNormal, #yiv2285517206 li.yiv2285517206MsoNormal, #yiv2285517206 div.yiv2285517206MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv2285517206 a:link, #yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2285517206 a:visited, #yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2285517206 p {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv2285517206 p.yiv2285517206ecxmsonormal, #yiv2285517206 li.yiv2285517206ecxmsonormal, #yiv2285517206 div.yiv2285517206ecxmsonormal {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv2285517206 p.yiv2285517206ecxmsoacetate, #yiv2285517206 li.yiv2285517206ecxmsoacetate, #yiv2285517206 div.yiv2285517206ecxmsoacetate {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv2285517206 p.yiv2285517206ecxmsochpdefault, #yiv2285517206 li.yiv2285517206ecxmsochpdefault, #yiv2285517206 div.yiv2285517206ecxmsochpdefault {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxmsohyperlink {}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxmsohyperlinkfollowed {}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxballoontextchar {}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxemailstyle20 {}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxemailstyle21 {}#yiv2285517206 p.yiv2285517206ecxmsonormal1, #yiv2285517206 li.yiv2285517206ecxmsonormal1, #yiv2285517206 div.yiv2285517206ecxmsonormal1 {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxmsohyperlink1 {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxmsohyperlinkfollowed1 {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2285517206 p.yiv2285517206ecxmsoacetate1, #yiv2285517206 li.yiv2285517206ecxmsoacetate1, #yiv2285517206 div.yiv2285517206ecxmsoacetate1 {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:8.0pt;}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxballoontextchar1 {}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxemailstyle201 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206ecxemailstyle211 {color:black;}#yiv2285517206 p.yiv2285517206ecxmsochpdefault1, #yiv2285517206 li.yiv2285517206ecxmsochpdefault1, #yiv2285517206 div.yiv2285517206ecxmsochpdefault1 {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv2285517206 span.yiv2285517206EmailStyle34 {color:black;}#yiv2285517206 .yiv2285517206MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv2285517206 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv2285517206 div.yiv2285517206WordSection1 {}#yiv2285517206 Hi All  Sorry I did not include a description.  The idea is that photons are made of fields, propagating as a wave, with a fixed velocity, and that the field lines would therefore spiral when spinning.   The red lines are the more negative and the blue the more positive. They fall off in strength as they get farther from the axis.  Flat version, no spin, viewed from the side:  Viewed from the direction of travel:  And from the side:  Chip  

From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of robert hudgins
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 9:48 PM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
Subject: Re: [General] Photon Spin  Dear Friends of Light, 
Pardon my intrusion on your discussion.  I have been warned that I will be excluded unless  I actively participate.  

Chip's diagram's are beautiful!  His skill is enviable.  However, it provokes questions.  Why spin h and not 1/2?  Are colors charge related?  

The photon may be a useful abstraction for expressing the way light energy is packaged, rather than a stable, traceable entity. After the photon energy has been assembled it may travel as a loosely entangled assembly of EM waves that may follow unpredictable paths-- until they are condensed  and captured by a resonator.   Though the electron is clearly more discreet, it might also travel as an assembly of waves that pass through both openings of a double slit while engaging in constructive or destructive interference.  
I am having conceptual difficulty imagining a topological twist that totally conceals only the positive charge of a photon.  

Is an EM wave having only negative polarity a plausible construct?  Are electrons without a positive partners being created with any frequency today?

Thanks for your patience,
BobFrom: chipakins at gmail.com
To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:59:56 -0500
Subject: Re: [General] Einstein Philosophy by DysonHi All Just finished computing a possible field topology for a photon with spin h.Viewed from the longitudinal axis:And the side…Chip  From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Mark, Martin van der
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 6:47 AM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
Subject: Re: [General] Einstein Philosophy by Dyson Dear Chandra,I agree. I think that Einstein was even more right than he realized himself, but the future must show us.Bohr did a great job on finding the structure of the atom and introduced a revoltionary way of thinking to hold up the postulates required. That way of thinking, however, is merely a scafolding, and it should be removed to see the truth and beauty lying hidden behind it.Copenhagen interpretation is now no more than a dogma that hampers progress!Cheers, Martin

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
Op 25 apr. 2015 om 01:32 heeft chandra <chandra at phys.uconn.edu> het volgende geschreven:
Friends: For a brief moment, allow me to change the subject. Freeman Dyson is an excellent writer. In the last part  of his “Book Review” article (attached), Dyson beautifully summarizes the three philosophical positions of Einstein (Classical), Bohr (Duality) and the current generation (Quantum-Only). To save time and to get to the philosophy segment, jump to the bottom of the picture showing Bohr and Einstein goofing and relaxing!My philosophical position is more in line with Einstein; while acknowledging that the one of the three key reasons behind the emergence of quantum uncertainty is “because the processes in the second layer are unobservable” (Dyson). This is why I have proposed, with demonstrated experiments in my book (“Causal Physics”), that when we start framing our enquiring postulates to imagine and visualize the invisible interaction processes, the nature start to become a lot more transparent even within the current QM formalisms. Further, this philosophy of Interaction Process Mapping Epistemology (IPME) shows that current QM, in spite of its great successes, a next generation formalism with deeper levels of enquiry has to be developed by the next generation. In other words, I am suggesting that our Knowledge Gatekeepers should change their blind devotion to currently successful theories and encourage the next generation to come up with various serious but radically different possible approaches.  Our conference platform is one such example.If we do not deliberately frame our enquiring questions to visualize the invisible aspects of nature’s interaction processes; we will forever remain in the darkness of duality. Duality represents ignorance; it does not represent new or better knowledge. We have to go beyond Bohr.Chandra. From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra=phys.uconn.edu at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of John Williamson
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 9:46 AM
To: David Mathes; Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
Cc: Manohar .; Nick Bailey; Anthony Booth; Ariane Mandray
Subject: Re: [General] Articles of interest Dear David and everyone,Sounds as though MIT does a bit of a better job of promoting itself than I do (what a surprise!).There is nothing much new in looking at single electrons. SLAC was doing this for years in HEP with its linear accelerator.  For that matter Millikan was sensitive to single electrons with his oil-drop experiment – and the school I went to was enlightened enough to let me do this experiment myself at the age of sixteen or so. What is marvelous is that they can make it sound as though detecting one electron something sexy! Robert Hadfield (in our group) is in the business of detecting single photons and John Weaver (in our group) has huge capability to look at individual electrons with some of his work as well. This stuff is widely published!More important than looking at detecting single electrons (easy enough!) is looking at the underlying  sub-electron structure. Back in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s I was in the business of looking at just that. I designed a single electron electrometer sensitive at down to about a thousandth of the electron charge. If you look at my Google scholar page you can find several papers related to this. The device could also be used as a single electron pump, to deliver a stream of electrons phase locked to the frequency of a varying gate potential.  My paper (see attached), looking at the electron sub-structure delivered electrons one-at-a-time and probe the profile of the individual electron wave-function with a resolution of better than a tenth of its de Broglie wavelength. This experimental work did not stop when I left the field of course. Leo Kouwenhoven, in particular, spent many years investigating my single-electron electrometer device (and creating new ones) in the last quarter of a century. There is now a very great deal of experimental information about the inner structure of matter, electrons (and photons) with which to work. What was lacking then, and is still not widely accepted now, is a proper theoretical framework within which to interpret this inner structure. This is what we have to do. Firstly develop the theoretical framework and secondly get the message out. We have to convince people we are not crazies and that this is serious, new science. That is what will be hard. Any communications of this to the outside world needs to get rid of the speculative , ill informed, or just plain wrong stuff that is perfectly ok within the context of an online discussion or over a pint or two, but not ok at all if we wish to make a serious attempt at convincing the outside world. Regards, John.From: General [general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] on behalf of David Mathes [davidmathes8 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:11 PM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
Subject: [General] Articles of interestScience moves on...two articles of interest for the discussion. Detecting a single electronhttps://newsoffice.mit.edu/2015/magnetic-system-detects-single-electrons-0421  Detecting photons on the flyhttp://spie.org/x113450.xml     

<1504_Einstein&Philosophy.docx>

_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at martin.van.der.mark at philips.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/martin.van.der.mark%40philips.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
 The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
_______________________________________________ If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at hudginswr at msn.com Click here to unsubscribe 
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at davidmathes8 at yahoo.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150426/2e303349/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6979 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150426/2e303349/attachment-0004.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 9140 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150426/2e303349/attachment-0005.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150426/2e303349/attachment-0006.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 153832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150426/2e303349/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 21767 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150426/2e303349/attachment-0007.jpeg>