[General] Electron

Thu Apr 30 00:24:55 PDT 2015

John
Adrian Rossiter’s torus animations is a good find.

David

      From: John Duffield <johnduffield at btconnect.com>
 To: 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> 
 Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 12:12 AM
 Subject: Re: [General] Electron

Martin:  No probs re mass and gravity. It’s good to talk. And if there was never any confusion, and we all agreed about everything, whatever would we talk about?  David:  I don’t have any issues with the horn torus or spindle-sphere torus. In a previous email I’ve referred to “inflating” the ring torus through these stages. See Adrian Rossiter’s  antiprism for torus animations. See Martin’s picture below? Look at the cut end, it’s a bit like a slice of onion. Mentally add more onion rings around those that are already there, and the torus gets more and more spherical.      There is no charge at the centre. The charge is the twist, the winding, the knottedness, the vorticity. Undo it with the opposite twist, and instead of two field variations going round at c looking like standing fieldall, you’ve got two field variations moving linearly at c.  Chip:  Is there any chance you could animate a wave in space, like this?    It’s a bit like a wave in a rubber mat, or a seismic wave. Only this is a wave of electromagnetic four-potential. The spatial derivative of this gives the sinusoidal electric waveform, and the time-derivative gives the sinusoidal magnetic waveform. See the horizontal lines? Where the tilt is steepest the electric sine wave is highest. Where the tilting is fastest is where the magnetic sine wave is highest. Look at electromagnetic radiation on Wiki. Read the Derivation From Electromagnetic Theory section, and you’ll see this: “the curl operator on one side of these equations results in first-order spatial derivatives of the wave solution, while the time-derivative on the other side of the equations, which gives the other field, is first order in time”.  After that I’d be very interested in an animation where two such waves pass each other and displace each other’s path, so much so that each wave ends up moving through itself.   RegardsJohn D
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at davidmathes8 at yahoo.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150430/a5c46101/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 13978 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150430/a5c46101/attachment-0001.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 26464 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150430/a5c46101/attachment-0001.gif>