[General] Electron

[Chip Akins]

Hi John D

 

Do you envision a 3D model which is a 3D grid of space with your prescribed
wave propagating through the 3D mesh? Or are you suggesting a 2D wave
representation?

 

Are you proposing that two EM waves interact to diffract each other?  Has
this ever been seen in experiment?

 

I suspect that a strong source of angular momentum must also be present in
order to catalyze electron-positron pair production (like when gamma rays
strike an atomic nucleus).  So I think this means the waves will otherwise
just pass through each other and the conditions for confinement will not
exist, absent this additional source of angular momentum.

 

Chip

 

 

 

From: General
[mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.
org] On Behalf Of John Duffield
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 2:12 AM
To: 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'
Subject: Re: [General] Electron

 

Martin:

 

No probs re mass and gravity. It's good to talk. And if there was never any
confusion, and we all agreed about everything, whatever would we talk about?

 

David:

 

I don't have any issues with the horn torus or spindle-sphere torus. In a
previous email I've referred to "inflating" the ring torus through these
stages. See Adrian Rossiter's
<http://www.antiprism.com/album/860_tori/index.html> antiprism for torus
animations. See Martin's picture below? Look at the cut end, it's a bit like
a slice of onion. Mentally add more onion rings around those that are
already there, and the torus gets more and more spherical.  

 



 

There is no charge at the centre. The charge is the twist, the winding, the
knottedness, the vorticity. Undo it with the opposite twist, and instead of
two field variations going round at c looking like standing fieldall, you've
got two field variations moving linearly at c.

 

Chip:

 

Is there any chance you could animate a wave in space, like this?

 



 

It's a bit like a wave in a rubber mat, or a seismic wave. Only this is a
wave of electromagnetic four-potential. The spatial derivative of this gives
the sinusoidal electric waveform, and the time-derivative gives the
sinusoidal magnetic waveform. See the horizontal lines? Where the tilt is
steepest the electric sine wave is highest. Where the tilting is fastest is
where the magnetic sine wave is highest. Look at
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation> electromagnetic
radiation on Wiki. Read the
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation#Derivation_from_elec
tromagnetic_theory> Derivation From Electromagnetic Theory section, and
you'll see this: "the curl operator on one side of these equations results
in first-order spatial derivatives of the wave solution, while the
time-derivative on the other side of the equations, which gives the other
field, is first order in time".  After that I'd be very interested in an
animation where two such waves pass each other and displace each other's
path, so much so that each wave ends up moving through itself. 

 

Regards

John D

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150430/61e92b81/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 13978 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150430/61e92b81/attachment.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 26464 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150430/61e92b81/attachment.gif>