[General] Vot is der matter?

[John Williamson]

Dear Andrew,

Yes. Root-energy density is just square-root-energy density.  As in square it and integrate it over a volume density. No-one likes new stuff.  Ke-vot and PE-vot are then valid quantities. Have a go at the papers! If they are hard to understand I want to know about it!

Regards, John.
________________________________
From: General [general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] on behalf of Andrew Meulenberg [mules333 at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion; Andrew Meulenberg; Mary Fletcher; robert hudgins
Subject: [General] Vot is der matter?

Dear John W,

Sometimes I think that I might actually understand what you are saying.

I hated your introduction of the word 'vot'. I did not understand it or why you though it was needed or useful. It had 'nothing' to give it a frame of reference (such as abbreviations do).

However, yesterday I found myself proposing to Bob that we might think of energy in a new manner. Just as intensities are scalars that come from amplitudes squared, can kinetic and potential energies (KE and PE) be squares of orthogonal components (aka KE-vot and PE-vot) of a total-energy vector TE-vot? Thus:

TE-vot = sqrt[(KE-vot)^2 + PE-vot)^2 + ...].

Is there something useful here? Can it determine what parts of a spinning gyroscope are KE and which are PE? Is matter PE or KE? Is there a mass-vot, etc. of a multi-dimensional vector? If so, what kind of algebra pertains?

I still don't know what your concept is. (I hope to have time to finally read your papers.) Did your definition of "root energy density" finally hit me that you may be simply referring to square root, not just to a 'deeper' aspect of the word energy? Did I pick up something at a subconscious level or did a 'mystery' (to me) simply trigger a search response in a different direction?

Then I see pi-vot and, connecting 'pi' with rotary motion and vortices, I connect it all with an internal wave motion. Then I remember that, while bullshit is good fertilizer, It is only useful if good seeds are planted. Is my mind being expanded - or simply 'bent'.

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150817/2240855f/attachment.htm>