[General] a new set of differential equations?

[Andrew Meulenberg]

Dear John W.,



You made a comment:



"Agreed. There is a lot of numerology bullshit out there. Please note, I’m
not primarily about numbers, but about a new set of differential equations
with new solutions."

You’ve also taken some shots at the Dirac equations. This ‘old’ set of
equations has a solution for the H atom that is absolutely rejected by the
PTB, because it is singular at the origin. The mathematical physicists, who
have rejected the ‘anomalous’ solution for 55 years (or more), apparently
believe in point charges and have no knowledge of nuclear physics and the
standard non-singular potentials used in that field for the charge affects
within the nucleus. Physics could be quite different today had the
consequences of this solution been explored.


Today, it is not possible to get a paper advocating this solution published
in a major physics journal (or even put into the arXiv). Papers arguing
against it *can* be published. Why do you think that “a new set of
differential equations with new solutions" would fare any better than the
anomalous Dirac solution? May be it would take an engineering journal to
break the news!


Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20151201/4833944c/attachment.htm>