[General] Richard's question and idea

[Hodge John]

RichardI may have just had an epiphany about your question. Thehypothesis would be that velocity does change the number of hods (therefore,the energy of photons) in photons.First calculate from the rotation velocity of stars ingalaxies the $\delta \nu$ from one side of a galaxy to the other. The study ofrotation velocity (50 to 100 km/s with small $\delta \nu$) on Virgo galaxiesdetermined rotation velocity from spectrographic data. Care with the positionangel (PA) and inclination would be needed. Perhaps a few spiral galaxies witha 90-degree PA and low inclination could be found.  When some data may indicate the relation, the peculiarvelocity of Virgo galaxies could be examined within the STOE assumptions andprevious redshift paper. The STOE provided a much better correlation than theHubble law model. The correlation to within 10 Mpc (within our cluster) wasvery good. The correlation in other clusters was poor but better than HubbleLaw calculations. The outliers had a line of sight near QSOs. If they areassumed to be spiral galaxy children (Arp), could give a 93% correlation. Butthis is still not as good as galaxies in our cluster. Perhaps the next elementis your suggestion that the velocity alone adds/subtracts hods to/from photons. Not reject the hypothesis would require at least as 95%correlation. And this would virtually make the STOE model of light a nearcertainty. But the correction would be small (1e-4 or so 2nd or 3rdsignificant figure).  Looks like the NOL forum has something to investigate aboutlight.  Wow! But for a lone researcher, the number crunching wouldbe awesome. The end result would be exciting. I really wanted to get on withthe proposal for a 3rd US constitution based on my survival andhumanity papers.  Hodge 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20151208/1e753dde/attachment.htm>