[General] Challenge

[John Macken]

John W.

 

I could not find the papers you describe. They might have been posted before I joined the group or they might have been skipped.  I would like you to recommend just one paper which simply describes the physical reasoning you use to achieve “no limit” to the energy density of spacetime.

  

I believe that it is impossible for any wave in spacetime to exceed Planck frequency or have a wavelength less than Planck length.  Combine this with ħ and you have a maximum possible energy density of Planck energy density Up = c7/ħG2 ≈ 10113 J/m3.  If this energy density has quantized angular momentum of ½ħ, then it is Planck mass.  If it has ħ of quantized angular momentum, then it is a photon with Planck energy.  Both of these form black holes with Schwarzschild radius equal to Planck length. If this energy density has no angular momentum, then it is the spacetime field that is the basis of my model of the universe. 

 

I have been able to show that combining a gravitational wave equation with an acoustic equation, it is possible to derive the energy density encountered by a gravitational wave with angular frequency of ω.  I call this the “interactive energy density Ui ” of spacetime. The coupling constant is frequency dependent so the energy density encountered is frequency dependent.

Ui = c2ω2/G  

 

When ω is set equal to Planck angular frequency ωp = (c5/ħG)1/2 , the coupling constant is equal to 1 and the equation gives Planck energy density c7/ħG2.

 

John M.

 

 

 

From: General [mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of John Williamson
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 2:46 AM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
Subject: Re: [General] Challenge

 

Of course it has the energy densities required. There is no limit on the energy densities. Furthermore it describes the dynamical forces and provides the differential equation that give force-free motion.

I have posted the papers to this forum on multiple occasions already . Including a copy of that which I submitted at FFP14 last year and a draft paper in several versions. Have you not had a chance to look at any of these yet?

Regards, John W.

  _____  

From: General [general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] on behalf of John Macken [john at macken.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:48 AM
To: 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'
Subject: Re: [General] Challenge

 

John W.

 

I must confess that I cannot find the papers that you are referencing when you say, “as described in the papers circulated.” 

 

Perhaps I can tell you the test that a spacetime model must pass if it is going to be successful at forming the properties of an electron or a top quark.  An electron with energy of about 8.2x10-14 J and volume of roughly λc3 would have energy density of about 1024 J/m3.  A top quark would have energy density of roughly 1046 J/m3. These energy densities would generate pressure of about 1024 N/m2 and 1046 N/m2 respectively.  

 

I have been criticized by claiming that my model of spacetime has the tremendous energy density required to explain the harmonic oscillators of zero point energy.  However, this tremendous energy density is required if waves or distortions of spacetime are the building block of any particle.  Therefore, does your model of spacetime have the energy density required to be the single building block of everything in the universe?  

 

John M.

 

From: General [mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of John Williamson
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 7:18 PM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
Subject: Re: [General] Challenge

 

Not so,

The medium being distorted in the "medieval torture device" is precisely that of space and time and of its product and quotients, as described in the papers circulated.

That is: it is in the space of space-space and space-time areas - and in that derived from products between them (such as the Poynting vector).

Regards, John w.

  _____  

From: General [general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] on behalf of John Macken [john at macken.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 6:04 PM
To: Nature of Light and Particles
Subject: [General] Challenge

Hello All,

 

Various graphic representations of electrons have been presented by members of the group.  They have looked like knots, spirals, loops and even medieval torture devices. However, not once has there been any description of the medium or the distortion that is being pictured.  This is the equivalent of drawing a three dimensional graph except failing to designate what exactly is being graphed.  

 

When I show pictures of my electron model, I can tell you exactly what is being graphed.  I have a spacetime field with impedance and a wave structure.  My electron model produces quantifiable distortions of this spacetime field.  They have specific wave properties with known strain amplitude, known frequency and known size. While I cannot predict the energy of an electron from first principles, I can calculate the energy of the model being pictured and show that it corresponds to the electron’s energy.  I do not hide behind the equation E = ħω and say that no further calculation is required.  I can derive E = ħω from my proposed structure of the spacetime field.  

 

Therefore, my challenge to the group is to identify what is being shown in the pictures. Are these waves?  If so, give the details of the medium carrying the waves. String theory has served as a bad example because they draw pictures of vibrating strings while claiming that the strings are a basic building block that is not made of anything more fundamental.  If a photon or an electric field is your basic building block, are you claiming that it is also unknowable? 

 

For those that doubt the existence of the energetic spacetime field, I challenge you to identify the components being pictured in your electron models. 

 

John M.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150701/6489aa6c/attachment.htm>