[General] Overview

Thu Jun 18 12:54:33 PDT 2015

John
Perhaps I am blind, blinded by the light, or blinded by the blitzkrieg of the first person "I" in a scientific communication, but IMHO there is nothing new here that a grad student in physics would not have already studied.
I disagree with your squaring the electron static force giving gravity only one polarity. Of course, your algebra may differ from mine since i prefer to use the exponential format so there is an imaginary component in the math. 
I will read your whole book once again paying close attention to assumptions and exclusions to determine whether there is bonafide closure or the argument is simply circular.
Best
David

      From: John Macken <john at macken.com>
 To: Nature of Light and Particles <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> 
 Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:32 PM
 Subject: [General] Overview

Andrew and All,  The Gravitational Transformations PDF that was included in my last post is merely an enumeration of the gravitational effect on units of physics such as the Joule, second, newton, etc. However, now I would like to give an overview of all of my work.    I started with the simplest possible starting assumption for a theory of everything which is: The universe is only 4 dimensional spacetime.  I am really a scientific inventor, so I decided to see if I could “invent” a model of the universe that used only the properties of 4 dimensional spacetime.  If this was a wrong assumption, then I should quickly reach an impasse.  However, if this is the key to understanding the universe, then I should be on a narrow path which yields answers to all of physics.   In my opinion, the result has been amazing.  Once I characterized the properties of vacuum energy (zero point energy), then everything fell into place.  I get particles with the correct properties.  From first principles, I derive that there should be three different types of forces. (I do not get the weak force and the strong force is short range)  When I calculated the two long range forces, the first force turns out to be the electrostatic force between particles if they both had Planck charge (about 11.7 times charge e).  Planck charge is really the basic unit of charge because it has a coupling constant of 1 rather than 1/137.  The next force that I get is due to the fact that the “spacetime field” has boundary conditions which dictate that waves in spacetime should have a nonlinear component. The first approximation of this nonlinear component scales with wave amplitude squared.  When the wave amplitude that gave the electrostatic force is squared, the result gives the gravitational force.  Eureka!  Furthermore, the squaring means that gravity has only one polarity since the square is always a positive number.      Einstein worked for 30 years trying to unite gravity and the electromagnetic force.  Once I reduce these forces to waves, I easily generated about 10 simple equations which connect a fundamental particle’s gravitational force to its electrostatic force. Here is one recently generated equation:  Fg/FE = Rs/λc      Fg = magnitude of the gravitational force at arbitrary separation distance rFE = magnitude of the electrostatic force at distance r assuming Planck charge qpRs = Gm/c2 = Schwarzschild radius of a maximally rotating particleλc = ħ/mc = reduced Compton wavelength which is the spacetime particle’s radius   To convert FE to Fe (the force between two elementary charge e), the equation is: FE = Feα-1.    I have not published Fg/FE = Rs/λc and other recently derived equations yet.  All these equations were predicted by my particle model. While others in this group are speculating about photons somehow being confined into a double loop, my approach gives has quantifiable wave amplitudes, sizes, energy densities, forces, etc. and these are being ignored. I claim that others are building castles in the sky because they lack a quantifiable foundation.  Others in the group use the word “charge” as if it is an unknowable property.  I can tell you exactly what a charge is and the quantifiable effect a charged particle has on the surrounding spacetime. I can tell you the effect a photon has on spacetime.  I can check this model of photons and charge because they both predict that there should be a limiting condition which produces 100% modulation of the properties of spacetime.  I claim that this model is proven because this 100% condition corresponds to the condition that makes a black hole.  It is not necessary to do an experiment to verify that spacetime has a maximum photon intensity or a maximum voltage on a vacuum capacitor.  It is impossible to exceed either of these conditions because a black hole forms.  In my “foundation” paper I give an equation for the curvature of spacetime produced by my particles.  This corresponds to the weak gravity curvature of spacetime.  Now I have gone further and shown that gravity has both an oscillating component and a non-oscillating component which we know as the curvature of spacetime.  However, in analyzing the oscillating component of gravity I find that it implies that a gravitational field also has energy density.  When I compare this to what I call the “interactive energy density of spacetime” I can see the physics behind how matter curves spacetime.  It is no longer just a correct curvature equation. The underlying physics of curvature comes from two different types of energy density interacting.  If anyone is interested in learning more, I suggest first reading my “foundation” paper which was attached to about 5 of my previous posts. Then I can give selected portions of my revised book.       John M.   
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at davidmathes8 at yahoo.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150618/e0bb864f/attachment.htm>