[General] charged photons

Tue Jun 30 07:14:27 PDT 2015

Chandra and all,
     Here is the view, from the side, of my “electron curved ball” (in red) composed of my superluminal model of a spin 1/2 charged photon. The modeled electron is going faster and faster in the lower figures, approaching the speed of light—now that’s a fast ball! The charged photon (red) is riding on the generic speed-of-light charged photon’s helical trajectory (blue) for a relativistic electron, which reduces in amplitude with increasing electron speed as 1/gamma^2. The top view image is the charged photon (red) moving  along the surface of a mathematical  horn torus to form a “resting” electron before the electron is “pitched”. The maximum pitch of the generic blue speed-of-light helical trajectory occurs at the electron speed v=c sqrt(2) when the forward angle of the blue helical trajectory is 45 degrees. The amplitude of the charged photon (red) reduces as 1/gamma with increasing electron velocity, and so this amplitude comes to dominate the amplitude of its helical trajectory (blue) at highly relativistic velocities.
   Richard


> On Jun 29, 2015, at 12:20 PM, John Macken <john at macken.com> wrote:
> 
> Chandra and All,
>  
> Chandra, you ask “What is Charge”.  You also say, “I can make one reasonable postulate that “charge” is an emergent property of the localized resonant oscillation of the vacuum (Complex Tension Field or CTF)”.  I totally agree with this statement except that what you have been calling the CTF I have been calling the “spacetime field or STF”. 
> 
>  
> 
> I have been able to quantify the properties of this field including impedance, wave displacement amplitude, wave strain amplitude, interactive energy density, total energy density, bulk modulus, etc.  Concerning charge, I have developed what I call the “charge conversion constant”: η = (G/4πεoc4)1/2 ≈ 8.6x10-18 meter/coulomb. This does not appear to have an oscillating component, but the complete explanation has both an oscillating component and a non-oscillating component.  Here is an excerpt from chapter 10 of my book.
> 
>  
> 1)    There are standing waves (associated with the electric field) remaining in the vacuum energy that surrounds the rotar.  These standing waves are at the rotar’s Compton frequency ωc and have the oscillating amplitude Ae = α1/2Aβ/𝒩2.  
> 2)    It is proposed that there is a non-oscillating term associated with the electric field with amplitude A𝔼=<image002.png> α1/2Aβ/𝒩.  This non-oscillating component is what we usually consider to be an electron’s electric field. 
>  
> I will not define the terms used above because the objective is to merely state that the oscillating amplitude stated in (1) gives the correct energy density associated with the electric field of an electron. The strain amplitude stated in (2) gives the correct non-oscillating distortion of spacetime produced by an electron’s electric field. The distortion of the STF (CTF) produced by an electric and magnetic field has also been described and quantified.  Experiments are suggested, but the distortion of spacetime produced by even 1,000,000 volts on a vacuum capacitor would still be too small to measurable with current technology.  However, there is another way to test this model of charge.  The implication is that there should be a voltage which produces 100% distortion of spacetime.  It should not be possible to exceed that voltage.  When this theoretical maximum voltage is calculated, it is Planck voltage and the implied energy in a cubic vacuum capacitor would create a black hole.  Therefore, this is a correct prediction – no experiment required.
>  
> Some of this is explained in my “foundation” paper attached to about 5 of my previous posts.  The revised version of my book gives the unabridged explanation.  I am happy to send my partially revised book manuscript to anyone that is interested.  It is about 90% complete.
>  
> John M.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: General [mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Roychoudhuri, Chandra
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 10:50 AM
> To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
> Subject: Re: [General] charged photons
>  
> http://www.amazon.com/This-Idea-Must-Die-Scientific/product-reviews/0062374346/ref=cm_cr_dp_qt_hist_five?ie=UTF8&filterBy=addFiveStar&showViewpoints=0 <http://www.amazon.com/This-Idea-Must-Die-Scientific/product-reviews/0062374346/ref=cm_cr_dp_qt_hist_five?ie=UTF8&filterBy=addFiveStar&showViewpoints=0>
>  
> Hello friends: 
> 1.      Charge: What is charge? Since I have never played Baseball; I have never learned how to through a proper “Curve ball”! But, here is one on electrical “Charge”! 
> It is an established assumption, supported by interpretations of diverse experiments, that an electrically neutral neutron is composed of a negatively “charged” electron and a positively “charged” proton. Then, I can make one reasonable postulate that “charge” is an emergent property of the localized resonant oscillation of the vacuum (Complex Tension Field or CTF). It is a unique secondary potential gradient symmetric around the particle; which is created due to the localized motion of the CTF. Thus, “charge”, as opposite gradients, can neutralize each other’s effect. In contrast, gravity potential gradient (“curvature”) around oscillating particle is always of “one sign”; and we do not experience “repulsive” gravity. 
>  
> Here is the second “Curve ball”! If particles are some form of localized self-looped oscillations of the CTF; then CTF becomes the universal Inertial Reference Frame; which further raises the question about the need for Special Relativity!
> 2.       “This Idea Must Die”, a Book: I do recommend the book for reading, simply because of its timely value to our current stagnant mode of thinking in our society. I have posted a very short social commentary on the above web-post while giving an “excellent” review for the book,  “This Idea Must Die: Scientific Theories That Are Blocking Progress” (Edge Question Series) Paperback – February 17, 2015.
>  <> 
> Sincerely,
> Chandra.
> From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org <mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>] On Behalf Of Richard Gauthier
> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 5:12 PM
> To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
> Subject: Re: [General] charged photons
>  
> Hello Andrew,
>    Thanks for pointing out this article, which I had not seen. This proposal of a photon with a charge and rest-mass is in the context of understanding protons and neutrons, but it could underly the electron also.
>        Richard
>  
>> On Jun 28, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Andrew Meulenberg <mules333 at gmail.com <mailto:mules333 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>  
>> Richard,
>> 
>> Does this pertain to your thoughts?
>> 
>> A unified field theory with varying charge and rest-mass   H. C. Corben <http://link.springer.com/search?facet-creator=%22H.+C.+Corben%22>
>> l Nuovo Cimento <http://link.springer.com/journal/11583> 1 Marzo 1952, Volume 9, Issue 3 <http://link.springer.com/journal/11583/9/3/page/1>, pp 235-252
>> http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02782585 <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02782585>
>> "... A photon may acquire a charge and rest-mass when extremely close to a charged particle, and the possibility arises for the formation of systems of such charged photons with rest energies of order 100 MeV."
>> Andrew
>> _______________________________________________
>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com <mailto:richgauthier at gmail.com>
>> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1 <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>">
>> Click here to unsubscribe
>> </a>
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150630/8d8f26cc/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: moving electron animation spin half photon bitmap 2.bmp
Type: image/bmp
Size: 1043766 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150630/8d8f26cc/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150630/8d8f26cc/attachment-0003.htm>