[General] Force Equations

[Andrew Meulenberg]

Dear John M.,

You may be saving me a lot of work. I was planning on working on
super-gravity this year and was basing it on energy-density-induced
non-linearities. You may have solved the problem, or at least laid the
ground work, before I ever get to it. Your statement "... gravitational
waves require spacetime to have the specified *energy density*... ," is
definitely pushing in the right direction. General Relativity is concerned
about mass. At the basic level, it is mass/energy density that controls the
interactions. This goes to the nuclear levels, i.e., below the region of
validity for QM as we know it.

Your study of the various ratios, and the identification of relationships
leads to a whole field of information that is to easy to overlook without
your signposts.

Good luck,

Andrew
_________________________________________________________

> However, I have also had two other major successes which I will briefly
> mention here.  In the future I will dedicate a separate email to each of
> these other subjects.  First, my son Jim,  has generated computer
> simulations which show various characteristics of my particle model. Since
> my model quantifies frequency, amplitude and impedance, my models actually
> represent calculated effects.  I might be able to send some computer
> simulations tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Another success is that I can now show that my model of fundamental
> particles gives new insights into the electric field and the gravitational
> field generated by an electron or other fundamental particle.  I previously
> concluded that an electron's electric field contains both a non-oscillating
> strain of spacetime that produces most of the effects we associate with the
> electric field.  However, there is also an oscillating distortion of
> spacetime at the electron's Compton frequency.  We know the energy density
> of an electron's electric field, the frequency and the impedance of
> spacetime, so we can calculate the amplitude of the wave required to
> produce the known energy density of the electron's electric field.  This
> amplitude exactly corresponds to the expected magnitude and distribution
> expected from my particle model.
>
>
>
> The new gravitational insight is: I can now prove that gravity also has
> both a non-oscillating component that produces curved spacetime and an
> oscillating component that implies that a gravitational field also has
> energy density.  When you compare the energy density of a gravitational
> field to the "interactive energy density of spacetime", it is possible to
> see how the combination produces the curved spacetime.
>
>
>
> The document attached above is a few pages out of the revised version of
> my book.  These pages contain some recently added information and some
> older information which was partly covered in a previous attachment.
> However, I decided to include some of that older information also since it
> sets the stage for the new information.  I had to start somewhere, so the
> attachment starts in the middle of the book.  Even though there is a vast
> amount of missing information, I think that you will be able to get the key
> points from the attachment.
>
>
>
> My approach based on spacetime allows much more detailed analysis than the
> rest of the group because I start with specific properties of spacetime
> which can be quantified.  I have dipole waves in spacetime which have
> specific frequencies, produce specific displacements of space and time and
> have dimensionless strain amplitudes which can be quantified.  Combining
> this with the impedance of spacetime and some equations that I have
> developed, it is possible to calculate particle size, energy, energy
> density, forces, etc.  Most important, the approach predicts that the
> particles (called "rotars) can generate three forces which correspond to
> the strong force, the electromagnetic force and gravity. In a previous post
> I gave some equations which showed previously unknown relationship between
> the gravitational force and the electrostatic force that were derived from
> my model.  Now I have generated more equations which specify the
> relationship between the electrostatic force and the gravitational force
> produced by fundamental particles such as an electron.
>
>
>
> The attached document is 5 pages.  The last 2 pages are totally new, but
> even the first 3 pages can be seen in a new light.  You will see that the
> relationship between the electrostatic force from charge* e* (designated
> *F*e) and the gravitational force (designated *F*g) is independent of the
> model which made these predictions. However, the equations on the last two
> pages fit so well with my model, that they become a proof for the model.
>
>
>
>
>
> John M.
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List at mules333 at gmail.com
> <a href="
> http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1
> ">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150526/5c3b729d/attachment.htm>