[General] Reply of comments from what a model…

[Dr. Albrecht Giese]

Hello Richard,

of course you are right, physicists have to be prepared to question 
anything which is currently believed in physics. However:

Before we give up a physical law which is very fundamental, we should be 
aware of the price we have to pay. If we give up the conservation of 
momentum, then we give up the symmetry of space (and also Newton's 3rd 
law) which are the causes of this conservation. And if we give up those 
fundamentals, then more than 99% of what our present view of the 
physical world is, will be void. Is this a price you are willing to pay?

So again, you are clearly right from the fundamental view, but I think 
that the requirement for a single-particle model is not strong enough to 
give up something like spacial symmetry.  - Acceptable?

Albrecht



Am 11.11.2015 um 23:09 schrieb Richard Gauthier:
> Hello Albrecht,
>     If conservation of momentum was "never ever" questioned in 
> physics, then physicists haven’t been doing their job, which (among 
> other things) is to continually question everything about physical 
> laws. Physical laws (including quantum mechanics) are just a summary 
> of what is physically believed to be the case in the physical world, 
> based on current and past evidence. No physical law is a sacred cow 
> and unquestionable, because it could be disproved or modified 
> tomorrow, or later today, by new evidence to the contrary.
>        Richard
>
>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:39 PM, Dr. Albrecht Giese <genmail at a-giese.de 
>> <mailto:genmail at a-giese.de>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Richard,
>>
>> I think that the conservation of momentum is one of the most 
>> fundamental laws in physics. It is even more fundamental than the 
>> conservation of energy. If now an object is made to move on a circuit 
>> there must be a force or something else which causes the 
>> acceleration. A second object solves this problem. - So there is in 
>> my understanding no need for an experiment as the conservation of 
>> momentum was never ever questioned in physics (to my knowledge).
>>
>> You mention a /double /loop. Does this mean any difference?
>>
>> Albrecht
>>
>>
>> Am 11.11.2015 um 17:44 schrieb Richard Gauthier:
>>> Hello Albrecht,
>>>    Also, who has ever experimentally tested the conservation of 
>>> momentum law for a single photon circulating in a double-loop at 
>>> light speed in a circle of radius hbar/2mc? I think nobody.
>>>        Richard
>>>
>>>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 8:27 AM, af.kracklauer at web.de wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 11:54 Uhr
>>>> *Von:* "Dr. Albrecht Giese" <genmail at a-giese.de 
>>>> <mailto:genmail at a-giese.de>>
>>>> *An:* general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [General] Reply of comments from what a model…
>>>> Hi  Albrecht:
>>>> You said:  A model with only one particle is in my view also not 
>>>> possible as it violates the conservation of momentum. A single 
>>>> object can never oscillate.
>>>> I ask:   Why can't a single particle oscillate against, or in 
>>>> consort with, its own virtual image. (Presuming there is charge 
>>>> complex around---mirror in 2d, negative sphere (I think) in 3d)?
>>>> ciao,  Al
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 	
>>>>
>>>> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
>>>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________ If you no longer 
>>>> wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and 
>>>> Particles General Discussion List at af.kracklauer at web.de Click 
>>>> here to unsubscribe 
>>>> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/af.kracklauer%40web.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of 
>>>> Light and Particles General Discussion List at 
>>>> richgauthier at gmail.com <mailto:richgauthier at gmail.com>
>>>> <a 
>>>> href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
>>>> Click here to unsubscribe
>>>> </a>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 	
>>
>> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>
>>
>



---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20151112/8306bb46/attachment.htm>