[General] Reply of comments from what a model…

[Richard Gauthier]

Hello Albrecht,
    If conservation of momentum was "never ever" questioned in physics, then physicists haven’t been doing their job, which (among other things) is to continually question everything about physical laws. Physical laws (including quantum mechanics) are just a summary of what is physically believed to be the case in the physical world, based on current and past evidence. No physical law is a sacred cow and unquestionable, because it could be disproved or modified tomorrow, or later today, by new evidence to the contrary. 
       Richard

> On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:39 PM, Dr. Albrecht Giese <genmail at a-giese.de> wrote:
> 
> Hello Richard,
> 
> I think that the conservation of momentum is one of the most fundamental laws in physics. It is even more fundamental than the conservation of energy. If now an object is made to move on a circuit there must be a force or something else which causes the acceleration. A second object solves this problem. - So there is in my understanding no need for an experiment as the conservation of momentum was never ever questioned in physics (to my knowledge).
> 
> You mention a double loop. Does this mean any difference?
> 
> Albrecht
> 
> 
> Am 11.11.2015 um 17:44 schrieb Richard Gauthier:
>> Hello Albrecht,
>>    Also, who has ever experimentally tested the conservation of momentum law for a single photon circulating in a double-loop at light speed in a circle of radius hbar/2mc? I think nobody.
>>        Richard
>> 
>>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 8:27 AM,  <mailto:af.kracklauer at web.de>af.kracklauer at web.de <mailto:af.kracklauer at web.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 11:54 Uhr
>>> Von: "Dr. Albrecht Giese" <genmail at a-giese.de <mailto:genmail at a-giese.de>>
>>> An:  <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
>>> Betreff: Re: [General] Reply of comments from what a model…
>>> Hi  Albrecht:
>>>  
>>> You said:  A model with only one particle is in my view also not possible as it violates the conservation of momentum. A single object can never oscillate.
>>>  
>>> I ask:   Why can't a single particle oscillate against, or in consort with, its own virtual image. (Presuming there is charge complex around---mirror in 2d, negative sphere (I think) in 3d)? 
>>>  
>>> ciao,  Al
>>>  
>>>  <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>	
>>> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
>>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>> _______________________________________________ If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at  <mailto:af.kracklauer at web.de>af.kracklauer at web.de <mailto:af.kracklauer at web.de> Click here to unsubscribe <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/af.kracklauer%40web.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>_______________________________________________
>>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com <mailto:richgauthier at gmail.com>
>>> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1 <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>">
>>> Click here to unsubscribe
>>> </a>
>> 
> 
> 
> 
>   <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>	
> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. 
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20151111/4d844294/attachment.htm>