[General] Strong Force Modeling

[Dr. Albrecht Giese]

David,

you have given here some criteria or properties which have to be 
fulfilled by a particle model. I shall try to answer this by listing 
some points which make up my model following your topics.

The particle model which I propose is not restricted to the electron but 
is assumed to be valid for all leptons and as well for all quarks.

To your challenges:

In this model a charge is an elementary entity, a kind of an "atom" in 
the real sense which causes a force onto a similar object. There a two 
kinds of charges in the model: the electric one and the strong one. The 
weak one is in fact the strong one but with a reduced coupling constant, 
caused by a different shape of the configurations having these charges. 
- Maybe that in the future development of particle physics we will find 
a more fundamental cause of charges. At present I do not see any, and in 
the present situation it seems not to be an urgent question.

The case of 8 gluons: We know that elementary particles react with 
certain others, but not with all. Particle physicists have made an 
ad-hoc assumption to "explain", or better to order this situation by 
assigning further quantum numbers to elementary particles, like isospin, 
strangeness, lepton number, quark number. The colour of gluons seems to 
be a similar category. These are in my case further properties of the 
"basic" particles, which are not described by the model as they do not 
influence the properties of the particles which I presently care about, 
like the inertial mass and momentum, which is explained by this model, 
as well as the conservation of energy, which is also explained (not only 
used!) by this model.

Leptoquarks have been an ad-hoc assumption to explain interactions 
between leptons and quarks. This assumption was not successful and is in 
fact not needed if the assumption of my model, that leptons are also 
subject to the strong force, is accepted.

 From this model follows gravitation as I have explained earlier. The 
exchange particles interact with light-like particles (photons and 
"basic" particles) and cause them to reduce their speed below c. From 
this all aspects of gravitation can be quantitatively deduced, Newton' 
gravity as well the results of Einstein's GRT.

Inertia is the direct consequence of this model. An elementary particle 
is, according to this model, extended, and any extended object has 
inevitably an inertial behaviour. I have shown (and show it in my web 
site) that with reference to this mechanism the mass of the electron can 
be determined with an accuracy of almost 1 : 1 million.

I am using exchange particles as mediators for the forces in a particle, 
which are the electric force and the strong force. The main advantage 
for the use in my model is that they provide a good physical explanation 
for the relativistic contraction.

Best regards
Albrecht



Am 16.10.2015 um 17:41 schrieb davidmathes8 at yahoo.com:
> Albrecht
>
> If the electron modeling is to succeed and gain wide acceptance, then 
> the modeling needs to become a foundation that can be built on to 
> develop other Elementary Particles. While photonic electron theories 
> may be that foundation, there are three challenges. First, explaining 
> charge and the source of charge. Second, modeling the eight gluons - 
> one would usually be enough, but eight...? Third, modeling the 
> transitory nature of quarks and leptoquarks.
>
> Modeling the electron to satisfy the leptoquark theory may involve 
> force-bound states. If so, then in order for a lepton-quark 
> interaction, given the E&M nature of the electron or even electroweak, 
> no matter how transiently a leptoquark may require an electron with 
> the addition of the strong nuclear force. Modeling a fully loaded 
> electron with E&M, weak and strong forces may prove challenging. 
> However, this path may lead towards explaining gravitation and inertia.
>
> For the experts in electron modeling, perhaps the key to unlocking 
> what's inside elementary is gluons. Glueballs (gluonium) may be worth 
> the effort of modeling.
>
> David
>
>
>
> Article
> Meson f0(1710) could be so-called “glueball” particle made purely of 
> nuclear force 
> <http://www.gizmag.com/meson-f01710-glueball-particle/39866/?-particle-made-purely-of-nuclear-force/>
>
> "Elementary particles come in two kinds: those that carry force 
> (bosons <http://www.gizmag.com/tag/boson/>), such as photons, and 
> those that make up matter (fermions 
> <http://www.gizmag.com/tag/fermions/>), such as electrons. In this 
> context, gluons may be viewed as more complex forms of the photon. 
> However, as photons are the force carriers for electromagnetism, 
> gluons exhibit a similar role for the strong nuclear force. The major 
> difference between the two, however, is that /gluons are able to be 
> influenced by their own forces, whereas photons are not./ */As a 
> result, photons cannot exist in force-bound states, though gluons, 
> which are attracted by force to each other, make a particle of pure 
> (strong) nuclear force possible."/*
>
>
> Arxiv
> [1504.05815] Nonchiral enhancement of scalar glueball decay in the 
> Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model <http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05815>
>
> Arxiv
> [1501.07906] Glueball Decay Rates in the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto Model 
> <http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07906>
>
> Glueball - Wiki <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glueball>
>
> Leptoquark - Wiki <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leptoquark>



---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20151019/273ec5e1/attachment.htm>