[General] research papers

John Williamson John.Williamson at glasgow.ac.uk
Sat Sep 5 00:44:34 PDT 2015


Will Do,

Just getting the place sorted, watered, picked and vacuumed. On the coffee. Not got into loft yet, but am ready for it.

Should leave in hour or so - meaning will be with you about midday.

Love from John.
________________________________
From: General [general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] on behalf of Mark, Martin van der [martin.van.der.mark at philips.com]
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 6:14 PM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
Subject: Re: [General] research papers

Dear John M,
Thank you for your encouragement. I thought I had done what you suggest already, but apparently that is only true in my own mind.
So I will have a look at it again, it has been 15 years since I wrote it.
The fact that I feel that I understand the situation is of little importance. Indeed, I must make the argument compelling enough to make other people wanting to see it.
I assume you have noticed  that the paper appeared on arXiv before the end of August, as promised.
Thank you for the sharing your thoughts,
Very best regards, Martin

Dr. Martin B. van der Mark
Principal Scientist, Minimally Invasive Healthcare

Philips Research Europe - Eindhoven
High Tech Campus, Building 34 (WB2.025)
Prof. Holstlaan 4
5656 AE  Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 40 2747548

From: General [mailto:general-bounces+martin.van.der.mark=philips.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of John Macken
Sent: vrijdag 4 september 2015 18:40
To: 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'
Subject: Re: [General] research papers

Martin,

I wanted to remind you that I think that you should update your article “Light Is Heavy” to include the mathematical proof that confined light has exactly the same inertia as particles with equal energy.  Accelerating a reflecting box causes different photon pressure which results in a net inertial force.  I already reference your Light Is Heavy article in my book, but expanding the article would be even better.  An expanded article would have particular relevance to the concept that the Higgs field is needed to give inertia to fermions. The Higgs field is not needed to give inertia to confined light.  Furthermore, confined light exerts exactly the correct inertia and kinetic energy, even at relativistic conditions.  I have not seen a proof that the Higgs field gives exactly the correct amount of inertia or kinetic energy to fermions.  Any particle model that includes either a confined photon or confined waves in spacetime propagating at the speed of light gets inertia and kinetic energy from the same principles as confined light in a reflecting box.

John M.
From: General [mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Mark, Martin van der
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 6:34 AM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org<mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>>
Subject: [General] research papers

Dear all,
My recent (and old) work can be found on Researchgate:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin_Van_der_Mark/publications
In particular you will find the most recent work:

  *   On the nature of “stuff” and the hierarchy of forces
  *   Quantum mechanical probability current as electromagnetic 4-current from topological EM fields
Very best regards,
Martin

Dr. Martin B. van der Mark
Principal Scientist, Minimally Invasive Healthcare

Philips Research Europe - Eindhoven
High Tech Campus, Building 34 (WB2.025)
Prof. Holstlaan 4
5656 AE  Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 40 2747548


________________________________
The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150905/a110fa48/attachment.htm>


More information about the General mailing list