[General] research papers

Sun Sep 13 09:31:35 PDT 2015

John D
I'm not so sure this is unique or the first. Various theories GEM, EGM and so on have attempted to explain gravity. 
The Poynting Vector, S = E X M, is well established science. In a peer reviewed paper, the Poynting vector is considered to be directly proportional to gravity. Murad and Brandenburg published...
http://www.ovaltech.ca/pdfss/The_Murad-Brandenburg_Equation.pdf
The Murad-Brandenburg Equation - A Wave Partial Differential Conservation Expression for the Poynting Vector/Field (AIAA)
David

      From: John Duffield <johnduffield at btconnect.com>
 To: phys at a-giese.de; 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> 
 Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 8:08 AM
 Subject: Re: [General] research papers

#yiv2986337547 #yiv2986337547 -- _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Wingdings;panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Consolas;panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}#yiv2986337547 #yiv2986337547 p.yiv2986337547MsoNormal, #yiv2986337547 li.yiv2986337547MsoNormal, #yiv2986337547 div.yiv2986337547MsoNormal {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;color:black;}#yiv2986337547 a:link, #yiv2986337547 span.yiv2986337547MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2986337547 a:visited, #yiv2986337547 span.yiv2986337547MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2986337547 p {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;color:black;}#yiv2986337547 pre {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;color:black;}#yiv2986337547 span.yiv2986337547EmailStyle18 {color:windowtext;}#yiv2986337547 span.yiv2986337547EmailStyle19 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv2986337547 span.yiv2986337547EmailStyle20 {color:#20188C;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;}#yiv2986337547 span.yiv2986337547EmailStyle21 {color:windowtext;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;}#yiv2986337547 span.yiv2986337547HTMLPreformattedChar {font-family:Consolas;color:black;}#yiv2986337547 span.yiv2986337547EmailStyle25 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv2986337547 .yiv2986337547MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}#yiv2986337547 div.yiv2986337547WordSection1 {}#yiv2986337547 _filtered #yiv2986337547 {} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Wingdings;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Wingdings;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Wingdings;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;} _filtered #yiv2986337547 {font-family:Symbol;}#yiv2986337547 ol {margin-bottom:0cm;}#yiv2986337547 ul {margin-bottom:0cm;}#yiv2986337547 All:  Make sure you check out Albrecht’s website re things like gravity.        I might express things slightly differently, but I think the general idea expressed by Albrecht is essentially correct. And I don’t anybody who described this before he did.     RegardsJohn Duffield  

From: General [mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Albrecht Giese
Sent: 11 September 2015 17:52
To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
Subject: Re: [General] research papers  Dear John Macken,

I would like to answer a specific topic in your mail below. You write "... would have particular relevance to the concept that the Higgs field is needed to give inertia to fermions".

We should not overlook that even mainstream physicists working on elementary particles admit that the Higgs theory is not able to explain inertia.  I give you as a reference: >Steven D. Brass, The cosmological constant puzzle, Journal of Physics G, Nuclear and Particle Physics 38, 4(2011) 43201< ,which has the result that the Higgs field, which causes inertia according to the theory, is by at least 56 orders of magnitude too small to explain the mass of the elementary particles. (Another weakness is the fact that the Higgs theory does not tell us the mass of any elementary particle even if all other parameters are known.)

As you may remember, in our meeting I have presented a model explaining inertia which does not only work as a general idea but provides very precise results for the mass of leptons. The mass is classically deduced from the size of a particle.  It also explains the mass of quarks, but here the verification is more difficult, due to the lack of measurements. In addition I have shown that the model also explains the (dynamic) mass of photons, if the size of a photon is related to its wavelength. 

You may find details in the proceedings of our San Diego meeting, but also on the following web sites:

www.ag-physics.org/rmass
www.ag-physics.org/electron .

You may also find the sites by Google search entering the string "origin of mass". You will find it on position 1 or 2 of the list, where it has constantly been during the past 12 years.

If you have any questions about it, please ask me. I will be happy about any discussion.

With best regards
Albrecht Giese

Am 04.09.2015 um 18:40 schrieb John Macken:
Martin, I wanted to remind you that I think that you should update your article “Light Is Heavy” to include the mathematical proof that confined light has exactly the same inertia as particles with equal energy.  Accelerating a reflecting box causes different photon pressure which results in a net inertial force.  I already reference your Light Is Heavy article in my book, but expanding the article would be even better.  An expanded article would have particular relevance to the concept that the Higgs field is needed to give inertia to fermions. The Higgs field is not needed to give inertia to confined light.  Furthermore, confined light exerts exactly the correct inertia and kinetic energy, even at relativistic conditions.  I have not seen a proof that the Higgs field gives exactly the correct amount of inertia or kinetic energy to fermions.  Any particle model that includes either a confined photon or confined waves in spacetime propagating at the speed of light gets inertia and kinetic energy from the same principles as confined light in a reflecting box. John M. From: General [mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Mark, Martin van der
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 6:34 AM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Subject: [General] research papers Dear all,My recent (and old) work can be found on Researchgate:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin_Van_der_Mark/publicationsIn particular you will find the most recent work:   
   - On the nature of “stuff” and the hierarchy of forces
   - Quantum mechanical probability current as electromagnetic 4-current from topological EM fields
Very best regards,Martin Dr. Martin B. van der MarkPrincipal Scientist, Minimally Invasive Healthcare Philips Research Europe - EindhovenHigh Tech Campus, Building 34 (WB2.025)Prof. Holstlaan 45656 AE  Eindhoven, The NetherlandsTel: +31 40 2747548  The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

_______________________________________________If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at phys at a-giese.de<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">Click here to unsubscribe</a>

|  | Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. 
www.avast.com  |

_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at davidmathes8 at yahoo.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150913/2d5eaee0/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 9418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150913/2d5eaee0/attachment.png>