[General] research papers
Dr. Albrecht Giese
genmail at a-giese.de
Mon Sep 14 08:26:20 PDT 2015
Hi David,
you are right that there is a lot of theories about gravity. I take it
as an advantage of my model that it directly deduces the law of gravity
introduced by Newton using the known variation of c and the internal
oscillation in elementary particles. And at the same time it covers the
relativistic aspects of gravity.
Sincerely
Albrecht
Am 13.09.2015 um 18:31 schrieb davidmathes8 at yahoo.com:
> John D
>
> I'm not so sure this is unique or the first. Various theories GEM, EGM
> and so on have attempted to explain gravity.
>
> The Poynting Vector, *S* = *E* X *M*, is well established science. In
> a peer reviewed paper, the Poynting vector is considered to be
> directly proportional to gravity. Murad and Brandenburg published...
>
> http://www.ovaltech.ca/pdfss/The_Murad-Brandenburg_Equation.pdf
> The Murad-Brandenburg Equation - A Wave Partial Differential
> Conservation Expression for the Poynting Vector/Field (AIAA)
> <http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2012-997>
>
> David
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* John Duffield <johnduffield at btconnect.com>
> *To:* phys at a-giese.de; 'Nature of Light and Particles - General
> Discussion' <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 13, 2015 8:08 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [General] research papers
>
> All:
> Make sure you check out Albrecht’s website
> <http://www.ag-physics.org/gravity/> re things like gravity.
> I might express things slightly differently, but I think the
> general idea expressed by Albrecht is essentially correct. And I
> don’t anybody who described this before he did.
> Regards
> John Duffield
>
>
> *From:*General
> [mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Dr. Albrecht Giese
> *Sent:* 11 September 2015 17:52
> *To:* general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> *Subject:* Re: [General] research papers
> Dear John Macken,
>
> I would like to answer a specific topic in your mail below. You
> write "... would have particular relevance to the concept that the
> Higgs field is needed to give inertia to fermions".
>
> We should not overlook that even mainstream physicists working on
> elementary particles admit that the Higgs theory is not able to
> explain inertia. I give you as a reference:
> >Steven D. Brass, The cosmological constant puzzle, Journal of
> Physics G, Nuclear and Particle Physics 38, 4(2011) 43201< ,
> which has the result that the Higgs field, which causes inertia
> according to the theory, is by at least 56 orders of magnitude too
> small to explain the mass of the elementary particles. (Another
> weakness is the fact that the Higgs theory does not tell us the
> mass of any elementary particle even if all other parameters are
> known.)
>
> As you may remember, in our meeting I have presented a model
> explaining inertia which does not only work as a general idea but
> provides very precise results for the mass of leptons. The mass is
> classically deduced from the size of a particle. It also explains
> the mass of quarks, but here the verification is more difficult,
> due to the lack of measurements. In addition I have shown that the
> model also explains the (dynamic) mass of photons, if the size of
> a photon is related to its wavelength.
>
> You may find details in the proceedings of our San Diego meeting,
> but also on the following web sites:
>
> www.ag-physics.org/rmass <http://www.ag-physics.org/rmass>
> www.ag-physics.org/electron <http://www.ag-physics.org/electron> .
>
> You may also find the sites by Google search entering the string
> "origin of mass". You will find it on position 1 or 2 of the list,
> where it has constantly been during the past 12 years.
>
> If you have any questions about it, please ask me. I will be happy
> about any discussion.
>
> With best regards
> Albrecht Giese
>
> Am 04.09.2015 um 18:40 schrieb John Macken:
>
> Martin,
> I wanted to remind you that I think that you should update
> your article “Light Is Heavy” to include the mathematical
> proof that confined light has exactly the same inertia as
> particles with equal energy. Accelerating a reflecting box
> causes different photon pressure which results in a net
> inertial force. I already reference your Light Is Heavy
> article in my book, but expanding the article would be even
> better. An expanded article would have particular relevance
> to the concept that the Higgs field is needed to give inertia
> to fermions. The Higgs field is not needed to give inertia to
> confined light. Furthermore, confined light exerts exactly the
> correct inertia and kinetic energy, even at relativistic
> conditions. I have not seen a proof that the Higgs field
> gives exactly the correct amount of inertia or kinetic energy
> to fermions. Any particle model that includes either a
> confined photon or confined waves in spacetime propagating at
> the speed of light gets inertia and kinetic energy from the
> same principles as confined light in a reflecting box.
> John M.
> *From:* General
> [mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Mark, Martin van der
> *Sent:* Friday, September 04, 2015 6:34 AM
> *To:* Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
> <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> *Subject:* [General] research papers
> Dear all,
> My recent (and old) work can be found on Researchgate:
> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin_Van_der_Mark/publications
> In particular you will find the most recent work:
>
> * On the nature of “stuff” and the hierarchy of forces
> * Quantum mechanical probability current as electromagnetic
> 4-current from topological EM fields
>
> Very best regards,
> Martin
> Dr. Martin B. van der Mark
> Principal Scientist, Minimally Invasive Healthcare
> Philips Research Europe - Eindhoven
> High Tech Campus, Building 34 (WB2.025)
> Prof. Holstlaan 4
> 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
> Tel: +31 40 2747548
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be confidential
> and legally protected under applicable law. The message is
> intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is
> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail
> and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List atphys at a-giese.de <mailto:phys at a-giese.de>
>
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>>
>
> Click here to unsubscribe
>
> </a>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
> Light and Particles General Discussion List at
> davidmathes8 at yahoo.com <mailto:davidmathes8 at yahoo.com>
> <a
> href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150914/6bc40dd0/attachment.htm>
More information about the General
mailing list