[General] inertia

[Richard Gauthier]

Hello Andrew,
     Is your own relativistic model of the electron’s inertia (electron as a spherically bound photon) written up? You can put it on academia.edu <http://academia.edu/> or another website if it’s not already. I’d like to compare it with mine at https://www.academia.edu/23184598/Origin_of_the_Electrons_Inertia_and_Relativistic_Energy_Momentum_Equation_in_the_Spin-_Charged_Photon_Electron_Model <https://www.academia.edu/23184598/Origin_of_the_Electrons_Inertia_and_Relativistic_Energy_Momentum_Equation_in_the_Spin-_Charged_Photon_Electron_Model>  .
      Richard

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Andrew Meulenberg <mules333 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Albrecht,
> 
> You have repeatedly based your model on lack of alternatives (with very precise results). E.g., 
> 
> Why 2 particles in the model? I say it again:
> 
> 1) to maintain the conservation of momentum in the view of oscillations
> 2) to have a mechanism for inertia (which has very precise results, otherwise non-existent in present physics)
> 
> I will be happy to see alternatives for both points. Up to now I have not seen any.
> 
> I'm sure that alternatives exist. Whether they have very precise results to support them may be up for debate. 
> 
> My own relativistic model for inertia depends on the electron being, in its ground (restmass) state, a spherically bound photon. Until that concept is accepted, it makes little sense to go further in a description. However, if accepted, it then also leads to understanding the inertia of a photon. 
> 
> Your two-particle model faces the same challenge. Unless you are able to shape that premise into an acceptable form, it is unlikely that anything that follows will matter. Can you (re)define your particles to be acceptable to an audience and still fulfill your assumptions and derived results?
> 
> Andrew
> 
> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. 
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <x-msg://12/#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>_______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160401/09a64e09/attachment.htm>