[General] Wilczek's electron

[Vladimir Tamari]

Hi
Thank you for the interesting discussions. I have just read Wilczek's nature paper and learned many things. That an electron can be viewed as a dipole is exciting as in my Beautiful Universe (BU) model the intrinsic dipolarity of spinning vacuum nodes that, when locked together in -+ attraction create  matter.  But spin in matter is always actively in sync with the spin of its surrounding space - the wave field around it. Here is a figure from my paper to illustrate it. Hope this helps
Vladimir


_____________________
vladimirtamari.com

> On Apr 16, 2016, at 7:31 PM, Andrew Meulenberg <mules333 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Albrecht,
> 
> You mentioned an article that seems to counter, rather than support, your model of the binary electron. You state: "On the other hand there was a kind of indication for two constituents described by the article of Frank Wilczek about the electron in Nature in summer 2013." (attached)."
> 
> Some statements from the article:
> 
> "The electron is effectively a spinning ball of charge, and elementary electromagnetism tells us that this generates
> a magnetic dipole field." 
> 
> "An electric dipole, should it exist, would generate broadly similar corrections. But no such field has been detected."
> 
> "So far there is only an upper bound for the electric dipole moment. This is an extraordinary 17 orders of magnitude smaller than one might expect — naively, given the electron’s effective size." [.... estimated to be roughly 2.4 × 10^–12 metres]. 
> 
> Despite the lack of measured dipole, he states:
> "So a non-zero electric dipole moment for electrons is a theoretical possibility."
> This seems to be the only support for your model from that angle.
> 
> On the other hand, you are not expecting your twin particles to be attracted by electrostatic forces (you suggest something like strong nuclear forces). Therefore, an electric dipole would not be expected; some other form of dipole would be. But, if no electric dipole, what causes the EM fields?
> 
> While I find most of Wilczek's statements to be 'correct' and useful, I consider some to be just wrong. Nevertheless, it is a useful reference. It is not as authoritative as his “Origins of Mass,” arXiv:1206.7114v2 22 Aug 2012.  However, it took me many hours of work to derive real benefit from this latter paper. But now I have a new 'tool'. 
> 
> I did not find his "enigmatic electron" to be as useful. I have attached a preprint to a paper that I will submit this week that references both of Wilczek's papers. I hope that it will be published and might open the way for new thinking in the photon to lepton transition.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Andrew
> 
> <Wilchek enigmatic electron.pdf>
> <Symmetry breaking in photon 14 +AM6.docx>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at vladimirtamari at hotmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160419/5200e619/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image1.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 334474 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160419/5200e619/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at vladimirtamari at hotmail.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>