[General] paper

[Wolfgang Baer]

John;
just got back from a trip

Thank you for the reference and the up load to your further thoughts.

An experiment that distinguishes between particle and wave diffraction 
would certainly be important on its own whether or not it supports a 
STOE theory or not.

I do not know  if anyone can get the water tank experiment done?

Would your Experiment show  the electron to be a particle? Can it be 
carried out?

  Do not understand this "However, I don’t know about the EM radiation. 
How does the nature of charge depend on whether EM is particle or wave."


"The wave inthe plenum then reflects off the mask except where the slit 
is. The wave thendirects the particle. The impinging particles then 
cause the screen image."
Why do you need to assume a particle, Photon, in the wave? Why would the 
the photon concept not simply be explained by resonant antenna effects 
at the absorber? This would allow an atom to absorb radiation from a 
larger area and then the photon concept would simply be an explanatory 
projection into the EM field
Bth ERic Reiters papers and mine from the San diego conference suggest 
photons are mental projections introduced by detector effects.

I have to apologize since I do not have to fully understand your 
experiment, however the claim that your experiment can distinguish 
between particle and wave diffraction is in my opinion very important. 
Is there any way you could send me a short rational for this claim 
(perhaps an excerpt)

best
wolf

Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 4/22/2016 6:55 AM, Hodge John wrote:
> Wolf:
> I was working on this when your e-mail arrived.
> https://www.academia.edu/24659165/Hodge_Experiment_distinguishes_between_wave_and_particle_caused_diffraction_patterns
> ABSTRACT
> The Hodge Experiment was designed to support the Scalar Theory of 
> Everything (STOE) particle model of the photon. It also rejected the 
> wave models of light. The general model of light waves within the 
> Hodge Experiment's conditions is shown to lead to unobserved effects. 
> It also provides an insight into inertia. The STOE model of particles 
> and the wave model of a continuous medium yield indistinguishable 
> results for the screen image in the traditional diffraction 
> experiment. Therefore, the Hodge Experiment provides a method to 
> distinguish between a direct wave caused diffraction pattern and a 
> particle caused diffraction pattern that resolves the wave--particle 
> duality conundrum.
> I’d accept a water wave experiment when the setup shows a Fraunhofer 
> diffraction pattern at the 2^nd mask (the 1^st slit should be several 
> wavelengths wide). Can anyone get the water tank experiment done?
> I think the electron would show to be a particle. However, I don’t 
> know about the EM radiation. The nature of charge depends on whether 
> EM is particle or wave.
> Hodge
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160424/34a7bba2/attachment.htm>