[General] paper

[Hodge John]

Wolf:I havedifficulty printing the Academia papers. Do you?Ifso, I understand why you see only 1 page.Thefollowing link is easier to print. http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1712  IsEric Reiter the author of “New Experiments call for a continuous absorption …”?
 Hodge  

    On Sunday, April 24, 2016 9:14 PM, Wolfgang Baer <wolf at nascentinc.com> wrote:
 

  John;
 just got back from a trip 
 
 Thank you for the reference and the up load to your further thoughts.
 
 An experiment that distinguishes between particle and wave diffraction would certainly be important on its own whether or not it supports a STOE theory or not.
 
 I do not know  if anyone can get the water tank experiment done?
 
 Would your Experiment show  the electron to be a particle? Can it be carried out?
 
  Do not understand this "However, I don’t know about the EM radiation. How does the nature of charge depend on whether EM is particle or wave."
 
 
 "The wave inthe plenum then reflects off the mask except where the slit is. The wave thendirects the particle. The impinging particles then cause the screen image." 
 Why do you need to assume a particle, Photon, in the wave? Why would the the photon concept not simply be explained by resonant antenna effects at the absorber? This would allow an atom to absorb radiation from a larger area and then the photon concept would simply be an explanatory projection into the EM field 
 Bth ERic Reiters papers and mine from the San diego conference suggest photons are mental projections introduced by detector effects. 
 
 I have to apologize since I do not have to fully understand your experiment, however the claim that your experiment can distinguish between particle and wave diffraction is in my opinion very important. Is there any way you could send me a short rational for this claim (perhaps an excerpt)  
 
 best
 wolf
  Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com On 4/22/2016 6:55 AM, Hodge John wrote:
  
    Wolf: I was working on this when your e-mail arrived.   https://www.academia.edu/24659165/Hodge_Experiment_distinguishes_between_wave_and_particle_caused_diffraction_patterns   ABSTRACT The Hodge Experiment was designed to support the Scalar Theory of Everything (STOE) particle model of the photon. It also rejected the wave models of light. The general model of light waves within the Hodge Experiment's conditions is shown to lead to unobserved effects. It also provides an insight into inertia. The STOE model of particles and the wave model of a continuous medium yield indistinguishable results for the screen image in the traditional diffraction experiment. Therefore, the Hodge Experiment provides a method to distinguish between a direct wave caused diffraction pattern and a particle caused diffraction pattern that resolves the wave--particle duality  conundrum.   I’d accept a water wave experiment when the setup shows a Fraunhofer diffraction pattern at the 2nd mask (the 1st slit should be several wavelengths wide). Can anyone get the water tank experiment done?   I think the electron would show to be a particle. However, I don’t know about the EM radiation. The nature of charge depends on whether EM is particle or wave.    Hodge        
  
 _______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
 
 
 

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160425/dcaf30c7/attachment.htm>