[General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission

Sat Aug 20 10:04:38 PDT 2016

Grahame:

I share your general sentiment. I’ll read through your paper and get back to
you. Meanwhile I rather think the “shake the rug” waves are light waves. A
gravitational field is a place where space is inhomogeneous, not curved. See
what Percy Hammond says here
<http://www.compumag.org/jsite/images/stories/newsletter/ICS-99-06-2-Hammond
.pdf> : "We conclude that the field describes the curvature that
characterizes the electromagnetic interaction". 

Regards

John D

From: General
[mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com at lists.natureoflightandpar
ticles.org] On Behalf Of Dr Grahame Blackwell
Sent: 20 August 2016 16:37
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
<general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Subject: Re: [General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission

Hi Wolfgang, John M, John D, Hubert, Vladimir, Beverly et al.,

There appear to be very strong reasons to believe that gravitation is in
fact an EM effect.  If one starts from the premise that elementary particles
are themselves electromagnetic constructs then it's almost a foregone
conclusion.  That premise was strongly evidenced by Landau & Lifshits in
Sov. Phys., 1934, reinforced by Breit & Wheeler later that same year and
proved beyond all reasonable doubt at SLAC in 1997 by Burke et al. (Phys Rev
Lett 79, pp1626-9).

It's at times somewhat paradoxical to me that physicists (present company
excepted!) all too often go looking for complicated explanations when
there's a simple one staring them in the face.  If one simply sees the force
of attraction between unlike unit charges as being minutely greater than the
force of repulsion between like charges - and there's no known reason why
they should be identical (in fact it's likely that they won't) - then
gravitation drops out totally naturally as the difference between those two
effects.  This would seem to sit well with Occam's razor since it eliminates
the need for one otherwise totally unexplained cosmic force at a stroke.  We
know that every nucleon is made up of a mix of particles of opposing charge
(quarks) to give an overall charge; it seems eminently likely that even
those quarks are formed from energies that, taken separately, would give
rise to either positive or negative charge elements to give the overall
charge for a quark - this links the gravitational effect of a particle
directly to its total energy content and so to its total mass.

I've attached a copy of my paper, published in 'Kybernetes' five years ago,
that details this proposal for gravitation.  You'll see that it posits the
notion that space(-time) has a 'texture' (also explaining its 'stiffness'
and the 'curvature of spacetime') given by the summation of all time-varying
EM field effects emanating from all of the material particles in the
universe - this of course draws on the fact that electromagnetic fields are
unlimited in their reach (and electromagnetic potential is unblockable -
Aharonov-Bohm Effect), i.e. that what we experience as a localised particle
is just the 'core', so to speak, of an electromagnetic field effect
unlimited in its extent.  The (-time) in brackets above reflects the fact
that this 'texture' of this 'neo-aether' is continually varying as celestial
bodies (and groups of celestial bodies) are themselves in continuous motion,
so also is their contribution to this 'textured' continuum.

I'd be most interested in any feedback on this proposal, including of course
any clear reasons (if any such exist) why it may not be a feasible
proposition.  You'll note that this concept includes a pretty thorough
explanation for every aspect of the Equivalence Principle as included in GR.
There's also the strong implication that the gravity waves recently detected
are themselves electromagnetic constructs (since the fabric of spacetime is
itself EM in nature, and so susceptible to being 'shaken like a rug' by such
waves); this may have something to say to Beverly's field of interest, since
tidal forces are themselves in a sense a pale shadow of gravity waves.

Thanks all,

Grahame

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Wolfgang Baer <mailto:wolf at nascentinc.com>  

To: general at lists..natureoflightandparticles.org
<mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>  ; Beverly Rubik
<mailto:brubik at earthlink.net>  

Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 12:49 AM

Subject: Re: [General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission

Hubert 

I've come into contact with a number of claims that connect gravitation with
local Electromagnetic phenomena. 

Obviously is the detection of gravity waves recently announced.

Regibald Cahill also claims random number generators based on the Zener
diode are actually not random but effected by gravity. I've not been able to
reproduce his experiment but am working on it.

REcently an Italian group has connected proton emission from stressed iron
being linked to the Cosmic background radiation cold spot.

I feel here is a connection but it is difficult to trust results, good low
level photon experiments are difficult to perform and can easily be misread
let alone interpreted. In this case could other rhythms offer alternative
explanations or correlations?

I've cc this to Ms Rubik who is familiar with these emission effects. It
would be good to gather a shit load of empirical data on these phenomena so
if you know any other experiments along these lines please let me know.

Thanks

wolf

Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com> 

On 8/13/2016 11:50 PM, Defiant NCC001 wrote:

To whom it may concern,

A couple of months ago, I found the following article:

Spontaneous ultra-weak light emissions from wheat seedlings are rhythmic and
synchronized with the time profile of the local gravimetric tide

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-012-0921-5

This article demonstrates an interaction between tides (gravitational
influence of the moon) and emission of ultraweak photons

How can such a phenomenon be explained ?

Best regards,

Hubert

Gesendet von Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>  für
Windows 10

_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and
Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
<mailto:Wolf at nascentinc.com> 
<a href=
<http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureofligh
tandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>
"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureofligh
tandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>

  _____  

_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and
Particles General Discussion List at grahame at starweave.com
<mailto:grahame at starweave.com> 
<a
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureo
flightandparticles.org/grahame%40starweave.com?unsub=1
<http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureofligh
tandparticles.org/grahame%40starweave.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>
&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160820/237a5e0c/attachment.htm>